The hottest Substack posts of Redwood Research blog

And their main takeaways
285 HN points 17 Jun 24
  1. Achieving a 50% accuracy on the ARC-AGI dataset using GPT-4o involved generating a large number of Python programs and selecting the correct ones based on examples.
  2. Key approaches included meticulous step-by-step reasoning prompts, revision of program implementations, and feature engineering for better grid representations.
  3. Further improvements in performance were noted to be possible by increasing runtime compute, following clear scaling laws, and fine-tuning GPT models for better understanding of grid representations.
19 implied HN points 08 May 24
  1. Preventing model exfiltration can be crucial for security; setting upload limits can be a simple yet effective way to protect large model weights from being stolen.
  2. Implementing compression schemes for model generations can significantly reduce the amount of data that needs to be uploaded, providing an additional layer of protection against exfiltration.
  3. Limiting uploads, tracking and controlling data flow from data centers, and restricting access to model data are practical approaches to making exfiltration of model weights harder for attackers.
0 implied HN points 07 May 24
  1. Managing catastrophic misuse of powerful AIs requires strategies to ensure they refuse tasks with potential for harm.
  2. Dealing with bioterrorism misuse may involve creating separate API endpoints, stringent user checks, and monitoring for suspicious activities.
  3. Mitigating large-scale cybercrime with AI may involve monitoring, human auditing, and banning users based on suspicious behavior.
0 implied HN points 07 May 24
  1. The most reasonable strategy to assess if AI models are deceptively aligned is to test their capability; incompetent models are less likely to be deceptively aligned.
  2. By using capability evaluations, models tend to fall into categories of untrusted smart models and trusted dumb models.
  3. Combining dumb trusted models with limited human oversight can help mitigate the risks posed by untrusted smart models.
0 implied HN points 03 Jun 24
  1. Categorizing AI catastrophes based on rogue deployments or lack thereof is crucial for understanding safety measures and potential threats.
  2. Rogue deployments, where safety measures are absent, pose a significant risk as they make causing a catastrophe much easier compared to non-rogue deployments.
  3. Different attacker profiles like scheming AIs, lab insiders, and external attackers play a key role in determining the type and severity of AI-related catastrophes.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
0 implied HN points 07 May 24
  1. Catching AIs red-handed changes the situation significantly, making it harder for the model to escape and enabling promising ways to prevent future escape attempts.
  2. Planning to shut down a model if caught scheming can be a sensible approach to ensure safety, even before deploying it.
  3. Developing techniques for few-shot catastrophe prevention is important, as catching escape attempts can provide valuable insights for improving safety and evaluating countermeasures.
0 implied HN points 10 Jun 24
  1. Access to powerful AI could significantly simplify computer security by automating monitoring and flagging suspicious activities before they cause harm.
  2. Trust displacement by utilizing AI for tasks that could pose security risks if performed by humans can enhance security measures.
  3. Fine-grained permission management with AI could improve security by efficiently handling complex security policies that humans find cumbersome.