Steve Kirsch's newsletter

Steve Kirsch's newsletter focuses on critiquing COVID-19 mitigation policies, vaccines, alleged corruption, censorship, and promotes early treatments. It presents data and personal testimonies to argue that vaccines have negative health impacts, challenges official narratives, and engages with censorship issues while advocating for transparency and open discussion.

COVID-19 Policies Vaccine Safety and Efficacy Public Health Corruption Censorship and Free Speech Early COVID-19 Treatments Data Transparency Legal and Ethical Issues in Healthcare Personal Health Freedom

Top posts of the year

And their main takeaways
24 implied HN points β€’ 06 Mar 24
  1. Scientific journals have been retracting papers unethically for decades, and it's time for this unethical practice to stop
  2. The author is suing Springer Nature for $250M in punitive damages due to the unethical retraction of their COVID harms paper
  3. The impact of the retracted paper on changing views, even of popular figures like Dr. Boz, highlights the importance of holding journals accountable and seeking justice
19 implied HN points β€’ 22 Jan 24
  1. The New Zealand data leaked by whistleblower Barry Young indicates that COVID vaccines may increase the risk of death.
  2. The data analysis revealed concerning trends like increased mortality rates after certain vaccine doses.
  3. Challenges in getting responses from scientists and authorities call for a court hearing to address the vaccine-related concerns.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
16 implied HN points β€’ 05 Mar 24
  1. The Tucker Carlson interview had a massive positive response with over 100K likes and 6.6M views.
  2. Steve Kirsch discussed controversial topics like the link between vaccines and autism during the interview.
  3. Tucker Carlson himself praised the interview, inviting Steve Kirsch back onto the show in the future.
15 implied HN points β€’ 13 Mar 24
  1. Parents who vaccinate their children can face accusations of shaken baby syndrome when their child develops encephalitis soon after vaccination, which can lead to permanent brain injury.
  2. Physicians may report these parents to Child Protective Services, attributing the child's condition to shaken baby syndrome rather than vaccine complications.
  3. There is a growing trend of parents losing custody of their children due to accusations of shaken baby syndrome following vaccination, especially with COVID vaccines in the mix.
15 implied HN points β€’ 14 Jan 24
  1. New Medicare data suggests that COVID vaccines may have increased mortality rates, contradicting promises of safety and efficacy.
  2. Unvaccinated individuals appeared to fare better in terms of mortality since April 2022, challenging the need for booster shots after that time.
  3. Flu vaccines also show concerning mortality rates, suggesting unsafe practices and lack of benefit.
15 implied HN points β€’ 26 Jan 24
  1. Lara Logan knows 20 people who died from the COVID vaccine but only 1 who died from the COVID virus.
  2. There are only two possibilities: the vaccine killed at least 5X as many people as the virus, or Lara is lying.
  3. Poisson distributions never lie - if there are such extreme statistics, there's something to be questioned about vaccine safety.
13 implied HN points β€’ 19 Feb 24
  1. The CDC has released V-safe free-text comments to show the serious safety problems associated with the COVID vaccine.
  2. There are nearly 400,000 comments in the release, highlighting a variety of negative symptoms and reactions.
  3. Using testimonials from V-safe comments could be a powerful marketing tool to encourage vaccine uptake.
13 implied HN points β€’ 19 Feb 24
  1. The paper critical of COVID vaccines will be retracted by the journal Cureus due to multiple concerns with the validity of the work.
  2. The decision to retract the paper was final, with an extensive listing of concerns to support the retraction, creating no room for appeal or discussion.
  3. Public debates or challenges regarding the retraction are unlikely to happen, highlighting the power dynamics in scientific publishing where journals ultimately determine truth.
12 implied HN points β€’ 05 Mar 24
  1. A pathologist in Croatia reported a 52% increase in cancer risk for ages 15-59 who were vaccinated.
  2. The study showed that vaccinated individuals had a higher risk of developing carcinomas compared to unvaccinated individuals.
  3. The pathologist does not recommend vaccinations and most people in Croatia are hesitant to get vaccinated despite medical recommendations.
12 implied HN points β€’ 22 Feb 24
  1. The study analyzed 99 million vaccinated individuals, claiming the benefits outweigh the risks, but critics disagree due to concerns about safety signals and limitations of the study.
  2. There is skepticism about the benefits of the COVID vaccine, with questions raised about its effectiveness and the reported adverse events, as well as the lack of transparency in sharing data.
  3. The discussion revolves around the comparison of risks between the COVID vaccine and the virus, particularly focusing on adverse events like myocarditis, highlighting conflicting findings in various studies.
12 implied HN points β€’ 26 Jan 24
  1. Trying to hide public health information is never a good idea, especially when pushing a vaccine.
  2. Health New Zealand is attempting to censor information, but refuses to explain data discrepancies.
  3. Public discussion and transparency are crucial when it comes to public health issues like this.
12 implied HN points β€’ 15 Mar 24
  1. The individual made multiple attempts to contact the FDA regarding various concerns, but did not receive any response.
  2. Despite lack of response, the individual was able to connect with a live member of FDA media relations leadership and presented their offer for a public dialog to address differences.
  3. While unsure of FDA's willingness to engage in public discussion, the individual finds the connection made with FDA media relations leadership intriguing.
12 implied HN points β€’ 13 Mar 24
  1. Harvard achieves scientific consensus by eliminating dissenting voices, creating an atmosphere of intimidation and silencing.
  2. There is a lack of transparency at Harvard regarding decisions, like dropping the COVID vaccination mandate, leading to questions about accountability.
  3. The message from Harvard to their faculty is clear: Follow instructions without questioning to avoid repercussions, which raises concerns about academic freedom.
12 implied HN points β€’ 06 Feb 24
  1. Large geriatric practice reported a 3X increase in deaths after COVID vaccine rollout.
  2. The nurse with 35 years of experience observed that all deceased patients were vaccinated, and the deaths were attributed to the shots.
  3. Question raised about lack of success cases where mortality significantly decreased after COVID vaccines were administered.
11 implied HN points β€’ 25 Jan 24
  1. Author offered to redact any records revealing private health information to challenge Health New Zealand
  2. Epidemiologists might have to testify about vaccine safety and efficacy in a New Zealand court
  3. This opportunity could challenge the safe and effective narrative about vaccines and help exonerate Barry
10 implied HN points β€’ 16 Jan 24
  1. The data showed COVID vaccines causing kidney injury, then it mysteriously changed.
  2. Scientists in New Zealand altered their research data without clarifying why.
  3. There was a significant risk of myocarditis after vaccination, which was not openly acknowledged by health authorities.
10 implied HN points β€’ 19 Feb 24
  1. The New Zealand OIA request revealed that COVID vaccines were found to increase the risk of dying, instead of providing protection against COVID.
  2. The data released under OIA showed that vaccinated individuals experienced a significant increase in mortality during the COVID outbreak, contrary to what was expected.
  3. Mainstream epidemiologists have avoided analyzing the data that shows the vaccines increased the risk of dying from COVID, leading to a lack of public discussion and questioning.
10 implied HN points β€’ 17 Mar 24
  1. Gates Foundation doesn't want a public discussion to address COVID vaccine misinformation
  2. The author proposed involving 'misinformation spreaders' and Gates Foundation experts in a dialogue, but received no response
  3. The foundation chose not to engage in resolving differences on vaccine safety and efficacy through open conversation
10 implied HN points β€’ 02 Mar 24
  1. Seven MPs have requested comprehensive data transparency from the UK ONS, aiming to unveil the truth behind COVID vaccine data with a detailed analysis.
  2. The MPs' request is backed by UK Professors Norman Fenton and Carl Heneghan, adding credibility to their efforts towards accountability and transparency.
  3. The UK ONS is in a precarious position as they cannot easily refuse the request, obligated to comply due to the scientifically sound nature of the analysis and privacy protection highlighted by experts.
9 implied HN points β€’ 16 Mar 24
  1. A recent Thailand clinical trial showed 100% effectiveness in preventing COVID hospitalizations with a 2-drug combination, in contrast to the 37.5% hospitalization rate with standard care.
  2. The early treatment combination of fluvoxamine and another drug displayed clear benefits in preventing hospitalizations and reducing serious adverse events, unlike the COVID vaccines.
  3. Despite strong evidence and successful outcomes of multi-drug treatments since early 2020, health authorities and organizations like CDC, FDA, and WHO continue to overlook and ignore these effective treatment options.
9 implied HN points β€’ 14 Feb 24
  1. Covid Litigation Conference II aims to educate and empower lawyers in Covid-related litigation.
  2. There is a significant need for legal representation for individuals affected by Covid policies.
  3. The conference provides a platform for lawyers to network, collaborate, and set precedents to prevent future injustices.
8 implied HN points β€’ 05 Feb 24
  1. TransferX is a project aiming to revolutionize the transfer of value and information securely and instantly.
  2. The project intends to create a parallel, abuse-resistant economy by making existing mechanisms for identification, transfer of value, and transfer of information obsolete.
  3. The goal is to make value transfers faster, easier, and safer than credit cards using public blockchains, with instant confirmations and high security.
8 implied HN points β€’ 13 Mar 24
  1. Watch 'The Unseen Crisis' to learn about vaccine injuries and how they were covered up by organizations
  2. Check out 'Epidemic of Fraud' to see how early treatments for COVID were suppressed and demonized
  3. Share these films with open-minded friends to spread awareness and educate more people
8 implied HN points β€’ 17 Mar 24
  1. The reduction in MIS-C cases can be attributed to the virus, not the COVID vaccine. The virus shift to BA.2 variants coincided with the drop in cases.
  2. The data indicates that the protective effect of the vaccine did not suddenly grow stronger after a year. Immunity actually started to rapidly increase over time.
  3. Credit should be given to the virus for the drop in MIS-C cases, not the vaccine. The CDC did not recognize this relationship.