Different conceptions of harm can impact ethical judgments in non-identity cases, where an act may be considered wrong even if it doesn't directly harm any particular individual. It's essential to understand the nuances of harm in ethical reasoning.
The non-identity problem challenges how we weigh harms and benefits, especially in cases where creating one individual may imply preventing the existence of a potentially happier individual. Balancing intrinsic harms and benefits can be complex in moral decision-making.
Respecting individuals' normative perspectives is crucial when evaluating harm and benefit considerations. Understanding the implications of harm, compensation, and overall welfare in decision-making processes is integral for ethical evaluations.