The hottest Metaethics Substack posts right now

Many modern ideas have ancient roots, showing that historical societies were not as different from us as we may think.
Considering knowledge as a skill, not just a set of facts, could offer valuable insights.
Consequentialism relies on being correct, highlighting the importance of ensuring accuracy in ethical decision-making.

Different conceptions of harm can impact ethical judgments in non-identity cases, where an act may be considered wrong even if it doesn't directly harm any particular individual. It's essential to understand the nuances of harm in ethical reasoning.
The non-identity problem challenges how we weigh harms and benefits, especially in cases where creating one individual may imply preventing the existence of a potentially happier individual. Balancing intrinsic harms and benefits can be complex in moral decision-making.
Respecting individuals' normative perspectives is crucial when evaluating harm and benefit considerations. Understanding the implications of harm, compensation, and overall welfare in decision-making processes is integral for ethical evaluations.

Matt Christman deserves appreciation for his understanding of societal injustices and the need for change.
The analogy of a room with limited democracy, resources, healthcare, and foreign policy mirrors the inequalities present in the world.
The message conveyed by Christman emphasizes the importance of solidarity, shared humanity, and the power to create a better world.

Nietzsche's views on morality can be contradictory and his writing can be hard to understand.
Nietzsche critiques herd morality, particularly on free will, transparency of the self, and similarity among humans.
He values the flourishing of 'higher men' and sees herd morality as hindering their potential.

The article discusses the connection between deep atheism and the desire for control, particularly in the context of AI risk.
It explores the theme of power-seeking and control in rationalist and accelerationist ideologies.
There is a cautionary tone about the risks and potential negative consequences of power-seeking and wanting too much control over the future.

Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

Cringe culture can lead us to make misguided choices based on avoiding embarrassment.
In philosophy, exploring wild and speculative ideas can lead to significant contributions and should be encouraged.
The dynamics between white-collar and blue-collar jobs may shift with advancements in AI, impacting societal connections and values.

Ethical subjectivism argues that moral statements reflect individual values or the values a better version of oneself would hold.
Speaker subjectivism provides reasons for moral actions based on what a better version of oneself would want.
Speaker-subjectivist semantics offer benefits like explaining moral truths, guiding moral debates, and accounting for confidence in moral beliefs.