The hottest Military Intervention Substack posts right now

Trump seems very focused on Venezuela because he wants to make a big impact on foreign policy, where he has more power than in domestic issues. This allows him to pursue his own goals without much restraint.
He aims for regime change in Venezuela as part of his legacy, inspired by other U.S. presidents who are remembered for their military actions. His administration is aggressively pushing this agenda to replace the current Venezuelan leadership.
Foreign policy has the most significant consequences and is where Trump believes he can shape history. This focus on international affairs gives him a way to leave a mark as an influential leader.

International rules that limit war and protect state sovereignty are fragile but crucial; giving them up risks more violence and lawlessness.
Those who cheer the end of a rules-based order underestimate how quickly that leads to a darker world where the strong oppress the weak.
The recent military attack on Venezuela is a warning sign that this shift is happening, and people in safer countries shouldn't assume they're insulated.

The Maduro abduction shows a new, bold 'snatch-and-grab' approach to regime change that sidesteps legal norms and leaves many questions about how it was carried out.
Public US statements about seizing resources and ignoring international law reveal a 'mask off' imperial posture where unilateral force and resource grabs are openly justified.
That precedent makes the world more dangerous by encouraging other states to copy these tactics, raising the risk of tit-for-tat raids, wider instability, and escalating conflict.

Many republicans are addicted to military intervention, as shown by growing enthusiasm for a military option in Mexico.
Aggressive policies like military interventions in Mexico are likely to backfire and harm relationships with other countries.
Proposals for military action in Mexico are concerning and should not be dismissed as mere campaign tactics.

Basic information is still lacking about historical events in Chile involving US intervention.
Structural power can impact politics and economies on a large scale without direct violence.
There were documented efforts to destabilize the Chilean economy to influence political outcomes in the country.

Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

The sudden abduction of a foreign leader looks a lot like past flashy interventions and raises real questions about its legality and what strategic purpose it actually serves.
Such dramatic displays of power mainly send a message — they can frighten weaker countries into cozying up to rivals, hardening security, or building asymmetric ways to retaliate, which hurts long-term U.S. interests.
A clever tactical operation is not the same as a strategy; tactical wins can embolden more risky interventions that may backfire and create bigger problems down the road.

The U.S. intervention in Venezuela has not removed Maduro’s regime and has left his vice president effectively in charge, so promises of imminent elections are not being fulfilled.
The administration’s stated reasons for involvement keep shifting—drugs, migrants, sanctions, democracy, and even oil—revealing no coherent or consistent logic.
That confusion and political incompetence create a real national security risk by putting American lives and resources at stake for unclear or self‑serving objectives.

The US continues to support Israel's actions in Gaza despite claiming frustration publicly.
Biden appears to be pretending helplessness while actively supporting Israel in Gaza.
US support for Israel's military campaign in Gaza has led to humanitarian calamities in Gaza and Yemen.

The Monroe Doctrine and Manifest Destiny are being used to justify harmful activities.
There are concerns about potential nuclear threats, war, and exploitation of resources.
The world events seem to revolve around control of energy supplies and corporations' influence.

An empire is like a national manic episode—full of grandiosity, recklessness, and the conviction that disaster only happens to other people.
Contemporary American imperialism often prefers killing and high-tech force over negotiation, treating other states as disposable and old rules as meaningless.
That approach shreds societies, breeds chaotic militias and state collapse, and produces unpredictable blowback that ultimately harms global stability and the empire itself.