Eunomia

Eunomia by Daniel Larison is a daily blog focused on criticizing U.S. foreign policy decisions, particularly under the Biden administration. It discusses the repercussions of military interventions, the misinterpretation of national security interests, and advocates for a non-interventionist approach and ending economic wars.

U.S. Foreign Policy Military Intervention Economic Sanctions Middle East Affairs Humanitarian Crises International Relations Non-Interventionism Global Security

The hottest Substack posts of Eunomia

And their main takeaways
825 implied HN points β€’ 11 Jan 24
  1. Military intervention in Yemen may escalate into a wider regional conflict.
  2. Airstrikes may not effectively deter Houthi attacks and could increase risks to commercial shipping.
  3. Focus on ending the war in Gaza as a way to address the conflict with the Houthis in Yemen.
727 implied HN points β€’ 18 Jan 24
  1. Attacking the Houthis in Yemen with threats and airstrikes is not stopping attacks on shipping and may escalate the situation.
  2. The U.S. designation of the Houthis as terrorists could further empower them politically and increase their popularity.
  3. The U.S. often relies on force and sanctions in international issues, but addressing the war in Gaza may be a more effective solution.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
668 implied HN points β€’ 17 Jan 24
  1. The Biden administration's decision to re-designate the Houthis as terrorist group is causing harm to the people of Yemen.
  2. The re-designation undermines efforts to prevent famine in Yemen and could strengthen the Houthis' power.
  3. Re-listing the Houthis as terrorists risks reigniting conflict and will have severe consequences for innocent Yemenis.
609 implied HN points β€’ 15 Jan 24
  1. Growing dissent and opposition within Biden's administration and party due to unchanged U.S. policy on Gaza
  2. Criticism towards Biden for neglecting Palestinian victims in statements, showing a one-sided view in the conflict
  3. Calls for a ceasefire in Gaza to ensure the release of hostages, highlighting the impact of U.S. support for the war
353 implied HN points β€’ 23 Jan 24
  1. Trump enthusiastically supported selling weapons to anyone, regardless of their intended use
  2. During his presidency, Trump made deals with Saudi Arabia and the UAE instead of cutting off weapons sales
  3. Trump criticized others for supporting wars for profit, but he did the same thing while in office
334 implied HN points β€’ 26 Jan 24
  1. Biden's response to the war in Gaza shows the consequences of giving another state unlimited support.
  2. Many Democrats believe that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza, yet Western governments are hesitant to act on this evidence.
  3. Public confidence in Biden's ability to handle international crises is low, especially after his support for Israel during the Gaza conflict.
294 implied HN points β€’ 31 Jan 24
  1. There is no major international effort underway to prevent the worsening atrocity famine in Gaza.
  2. The conditions in Gaza, including lack of food and water, are dire and leading to mass suffering.
  3. Immediate ceasefire and full restoration of humanitarian aid are urgently needed to prevent further deaths from hunger and disease in Gaza.
235 implied HN points β€’ 05 Feb 24
  1. President Biden is claiming that the 2001 and 2002 AUMFs justify ordering attacks in Iraq and Syria, but this is not accurate.
  2. Biden's official policy includes repealing the Iraq AUMF, and skepticism is raised regarding justifying recent strikes under the 2001 AUMF.
  3. Past attempts to use outdated AUMFs for military actions have been widely criticized as unjustified and not applicable.
353 implied HN points β€’ 11 Jan 24
  1. The idea of Blinken providing a reassuring projection of American leadership is not credible.
  2. Morale in the State Department is low under Blinken compared to previous administrations.
  3. State Department experts are being ignored as Biden and Blinken drive U.S. policy in a negative direction.
294 implied HN points β€’ 22 Jan 24
  1. Continuity in U.S. foreign policy under a second Trump administration should not be seen as positive.
  2. Trump's foreign policy record was mostly characterized by continuity with existing policies.
  3. Despite being labeled a 'disruptor,' Trump's foreign policy was not drastically different from traditional Republican stances.
275 implied HN points β€’ 19 Jan 24
  1. There's always a choice when deciding whether to use force or not, and usually, there are better options than resorting to force.
  2. The U.S. won't likely compel Houthi compliance through force; attacking Iranian targets would worsen the conflict.
  3. Taking military action that you expect will make things worse is both stupid and wrong.
884 implied HN points β€’ 07 Jul 23
  1. Cluster munitions are inherently indiscriminate and pose a threat to civilians long after a war ends.
  2. Providing cluster munitions to Ukraine may lead to more harm than good, as they can maim and kill civilians and soldiers.
  3. Exporting cluster munitions contradicts previous condemnations of their use, creating political problems and potential hypocrisy.
491 implied HN points β€’ 27 Jun 23
  1. Many republicans are addicted to military intervention, as shown by growing enthusiasm for a military option in Mexico.
  2. Aggressive policies like military interventions in Mexico are likely to backfire and harm relationships with other countries.
  3. Proposals for military action in Mexico are concerning and should not be dismissed as mere campaign tactics.