The hottest Criminal law Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top World Politics Topics
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 760 implied HN points 31 Jan 26
  1. Journalists do not have special criminal immunity; they can be charged for criminal acts even while reporting.
  2. The reports say he met with protesters ahead of time, knew their plans, kept them secret, and filmed the event—facts that could support charges like obstructing worship.
  3. Proving a crime will be hard because prosecutors must show he intended or knew others would commit the offense, and merely "covering" the news usually isn’t enough to convict.
eugyppius: a plague chronicle 181 implied HN points 23 Feb 26
  1. A pensioner is under criminal investigation for calling Chancellor Friedrich Merz "Pinocchio" in a Facebook comment.
  2. StGB §188 raises penalties and makes it easier to prosecute insults against politicians, so routine political criticism can be treated as a crime; likening Merz to Pinocchio is common and functions as political commentary about his reversals.
  3. Local police monitored social media and filed the complaint, showing how authorities can use these laws to intimidate ordinary citizens and chill political speech.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 621 implied HN points 18 Jan 26
  1. The Justice Department is reportedly investigating Minnesota Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey for allegedly conspiring to obstruct ICE.
  2. Sanctuary policies let local governments limit cooperation with federal immigration agents, and those choices are generally protected under the Constitution.
  3. The White House argues sanctuary rules create a hostile climate that endangers federal officers and is using that claim to press a legal campaign against sanctuary cities.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 983 implied HN points 03 Dec 25
  1. A Finnish member of parliament quoted Romans 1:27 to criticize her church's support for Pride, and she was later investigated and charged under hate-speech / Crimes Against Humanity laws.
  2. The case has reached Finland's Supreme Court and asks a central question: can quoting the Bible be treated as a crime, with big consequences for religious freedom and hate-speech rules in Europe.
  3. The probe began after a citizen complaint and has dragged on for years, even though she once served as interior minister and had previously overseen the police.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 1126 implied HN points 06 Aug 25
  1. The author once opposed the death penalty but changed their mind after seeing its importance in certain serious crimes. They now believe it serves a purpose in the justice system.
  2. Recent changes in federal policy have resumed the death penalty under the current administration, targeting particularly severe crimes. This raises questions about whether some offenses deserve this ultimate punishment.
  3. Support for the death penalty is not popular in certain areas, especially among liberal Democrats, indicating a cultural divide on the issue. Public opinion is complex and varies greatly depending on location and political views.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
Proof 71 implied HN points 23 Jan 26
  1. Trump has launched a new international organization and put himself in charge of it.
  2. That organization may violate federal criminal law and could be treated as a criminal enterprise.
  3. If the group isn’t illegal, it might be intended as a vehicle for refusing to accept the 2028 election results if Democrats win, posing a serious democratic risk.
Adam's Legal Newsletter 479 implied HN points 07 Apr 24
  1. The Presidential Records Act defense Trump is using isn't strong but has caused some interesting legal disputes.
  2. The court's handling of the case's legal issues has caused confusion and potential problems, particularly regarding the classification of documents.
  3. The outcome of the case is uncertain, with various possibilities, but the likelihood of a major, unexpected ending is low.
eugyppius: a plague chronicle 131 implied HN points 08 Dec 25
  1. Friedrich Merz has initiated more speech-related criminal complaints than anyone else in the country's history.
  2. Several high-profile politicians have filed hundreds or thousands of such complaints, and prosecutors use them to raid homes, seize devices, and impose crushing fines on ordinary social media users.
  3. This practice chills political speech and dissent online, and the true scale is likely much larger because many cases never become public.
The Reactionary 111 implied HN points 05 Dec 25
  1. A 30-year-old man, Brian Cole Jr., was arrested as the DC pipe-bomber suspect after investigators matched his purchases of bomb components and tools to items used in the devices and placed him near the RNC and DNC by cell-tower and vehicle records.
  2. The FBI says the arrest came from a fresh, careful review of existing evidence rather than a new tip, and some commentators have criticized earlier leadership for not identifying him sooner.
  3. Motives aren’t clear yet — investigators note possible anger over the family’s legal and financial troubles and some reported political/anarchist views — and officials are still searching his home and devices while asking whether he acted alone.
Who is Robert Malone 25 implied HN points 26 Jan 26
  1. Federal prosecutors opened a criminal investigation in mid‑January 2026 into Governor Tim Walz and other Minnesota officials, issuing grand‑jury subpoenas to probe possible obstruction of ICE enforcement. No charges have been filed yet as investigators seek documents and testimony about intent and coordination.
  2. Leaked Signal chat screenshots and social posts allege a coordinated 'ICE Watch' network that tracked, doxxed, and directed activists to impede ICE agents, with some claims tying organizers to state figures; those links and the chats’ authenticity have not been forensically verified. Crowdsourced tracking tools like ICEBlock were reportedly used to follow agents and were later removed from app stores.
  3. The controversy is part of a wider clash between federal immigration enforcement and sanctuary‑style local policies, made hotter by fatal shootings during protests and large federal raids tied to fraud probes. Legal experts say winning obstruction charges would be difficult because prosecutors must prove corrupt intent, and many critics view the inquiry as highly politicized.
Disaffected Newsletter 479 implied HN points 20 Jul 23
  1. Michigan is proposing a law that could criminalize misgendering, seeing it as a form of harassment. This could mean fines or even jail time for people who misgender others.
  2. The discussion around this law highlights the complexities and potential issues in defining hate speech and harassment.
  3. It's important to stay informed about such laws as they can impact free speech and how people communicate with each other.
Michael Tracey 162 implied HN points 11 Jul 25
  1. The Epstein Files myth has been used by politicians to gain public support, tricking people into believing that important secrets would be revealed if they vote a certain way.
  2. Many high-profile accusations against Epstein were based on claims from Virginia Guiffre, who later admitted to fabricating some of her accusations, which raises questions about the reliability of the whole narrative.
  3. The obsession with Epstein has created a lot of financial gain for some accusers through settlements, but it's also led to erosion of civil liberties and due process for those wrongly accused.
bad cattitude 282 implied HN points 09 Dec 24
  1. Self-defense laws like castle doctrine let people protect their homes without fear of legal trouble. It puts the responsibility on intruders, making it fairer for homeowners.
  2. Stand your ground laws mean you can defend yourself without needing to retreat when faced with danger. This concept challenges laws that require people to run away from an aggressor.
  3. Juries play an important role in the justice system. They can make choices based on their beliefs and experiences, which can influence fair outcomes in court.