The hottest Middle East Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top World Politics Topics
TOP SECRET UMBRA 0 implied HN points 27 Oct 23
  1. U.S. conducting strikes on Iran-linked sites in Syria after attacks on American troops
  2. Israel involved in operations in Gaza and trained soldiers in a ghost town replica of Gaza City
  3. International tensions and conflicts involving China, Ukraine, and the Middle East are ongoing
Hill Bill 0 implied HN points 21 Jan 24
  1. Iran launched a satellite into its highest orbit, raising concerns about its ballistic missile program.
  2. Russia has become China's top crude oil supplier in 2023, defying Western sanctions.
  3. Japan successfully landed a spacecraft on the moon, joining a select group of countries.
Omnibudsman 0 implied HN points 23 Apr 23
  1. Islamic terrorism did not get worse in the West, facing conventional terror attacks instead of catastrophic ones like dirty bombs or biological agents.
  2. Deaths related to Islamic extremism peaked around 2015, with groups like Boko Haram and Al Qaeda causing significant casualties.
  3. The decline of ISIS was due to coalition airstrikes killing fighters, and the decline of terrorism inspired by ISIS in Europe reflected the group's decline.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
Dana’s Newsletter 0 implied HN points 19 Jan 24
  1. Netanyahu is rejecting the idea of a Palestinian state and insists on security control over all land west of the River Jordan.
  2. International opinion, including from Arab states and the US, supports a two state solution despite Netanyahu's stance.
  3. There's growing recognition in Israel that the status quo cannot continue, and some believe a Palestinian state is inevitable.
Dana’s Newsletter 0 implied HN points 12 Jan 24
  1. Iran-backed proxy groups like Hamas, Hezbollah, and Houthi's are causing disruptions in the Middle East.
  2. International efforts are being made to combat attacks by Houthi rebels on ships in the Red Sea.
  3. The connection between terrorism in the Middle East also involves Russia's interactions with groups like Hamas and Hezbollah.
The Cosmopolitan Globalist 0 implied HN points 09 Mar 24
  1. There was a schedule change for ME 101, Week XII, with discussions postponed to next Sunday due to a miscommunication.
  2. The post invites readers to subscribe to The Cosmopolitan Globalist for a 7-day free trial to access the full post archives.
  3. There was an apology for the miscommunication with Shay, who will join the discussion on the following Sunday.
GeoPredict 0 implied HN points 28 Jul 23
  1. There are changing probabilities for various geopolitical events like Norway's EU referendum, Crimean Bridge incident, and martial law in Russia.
  2. GeoPredict tracks shifting possibilities such as armed conflicts between India and Pakistan, NATO commitments, and Islamic State attacks in Nigeria.
  3. Speculations include topics like UK rejoining the EU, use of ASAT weapons against satellites, and Putin declaring martial law in Russia.
Splattern 0 implied HN points 15 Dec 23
  1. Jews wanted a homeland due to rising anti-semitism in Europe, especially after events like the pogroms in Russia. This led to many Jews seeking safety and a place of their own.
  2. Britain supported the establishment of a Jewish homeland in Palestine to align with its strategic interests and to gain support from influential Jews during World War I.
  3. Despite facing discrimination, Jews had significant influence in media and academia, allowing them to sway public opinion in favor of their cause at that time.
TOP SECRET UMBRA 0 implied HN points 21 Oct 24
  1. Leaked US intelligence documents show Israel's plans for an attack on Iran, indicating rising tensions in the region.
  2. Russia is using threats and displays of military power to deter Western support for Ukraine, while also trying to reassert itself on the global stage.
  3. ISIS-K is becoming more of a threat, especially ahead of upcoming elections in the US, as they target disillusioned individuals with strong propaganda.
The Octavian Report 0 implied HN points 23 Dec 25
  1. U.S. withdrawals and weak policy in the Middle East have created a security vacuum that lets terrorist groups expand. That vacuum also raises the chance states like Iran will pursue nuclear weapons and makes regional allies doubt America's reliability.
  2. The United States must remain militarily strong and willing to use force when necessary to deter rivals. If it does not, powers such as Russia and China and unstable regional actors will take advantage of perceived weakness.
  3. Nontraditional risks like nuclear proliferation, EMP attacks, and solar storms threaten the power grid and civilian infrastructure, so those systems need to be hardened. At the same time, the shale energy boom strengthens economic and strategic resilience.
The Octavian Report 0 implied HN points 23 Dec 25
  1. History's lessons about linking human rights to foreign policy are being forgotten, and relying on realpolitik or friendly dictators for stability often undermines the long-term cause of freedom.
  2. Strong identity and national or religious belonging can strengthen the fight for liberty, and true democracy requires building civil society over time—elections alone do not make democracy.
  3. Technology makes it much easier to mobilize people and spread ideas but also gives authoritarian actors new tools to monitor and control communication; progress toward greater freedom is real but uneven and needs steady support for dissidents and civil society.
The Octavian Report 0 implied HN points 23 Dec 25
  1. Iran is likely to acquire nuclear weapons, which would threaten Israel and trigger a Middle East arms race; diplomacy looks unlikely to stop it, so military options may be needed.
  2. U.S. withdrawals and a perception of weakness have eroded trust among allies and created vacuums that terrorists and rivals like Russia and China can exploit. Regaining influence requires a strong, credible military posture.
  3. The civilian electrical grid is dangerously vulnerable to an electromagnetic pulse or a major solar storm, and practical measures and funding are needed now to harden infrastructure before a catastrophe.
The Octavian Report 0 implied HN points 23 Dec 25
  1. The United States' retreat from global leadership has left dangerous gaps that won't be fixed by simply reversing past policies. Rebuilding influence and military power will take years and a clear political signal.
  2. The spread of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons and the ongoing threat of international terrorism are immediate dangers, especially if terrorists obtain a nuclear device. Cyber attacks add another level of risk and require clearer rules for distinguishing espionage, crime, and acts of war.
  3. China and Russia pose different long-term threats: China is building military, naval, and cyber capabilities to dominate its neighbors, while Russia remains a nuclear-armed but economically weak aggressor. The U.S. needs tailored strategies, stronger human intelligence, and firmer alliance pressure to meet both challenges.
The Octavian Report 0 implied HN points 23 Dec 25
  1. Israel is less isolated and is increasingly seen as a global power, building new partnerships across Latin America, Africa, Eastern Europe, India, China, and among Sunni Arab states. Its strengths in water, cyber, defense, and other technologies, plus shared security concerns about Iran, are driving this realignment.
  2. The traditional two-state solution looks less realistic to many Israelis, given past withdrawals that led to more violence and the reality of autonomous Palestinian areas today. A more practical approach may be regional, informal understandings and step-by-step arrangements rather than formal, Western-style peace treaties.
  3. Israel faces serious challenges from delegitimization, rising anti-Semitism, and limited diplomatic resources, so it needs to invest more in public diplomacy and maintain broad international support. It also must carefully manage complex ties with the US, China, and Russia and address deep internal social divides while staying cautiously optimistic.
The Octavian Report 0 implied HN points 23 Dec 25
  1. The gravest existential threat is internal: government policies that expand isolated settlements and weaken democratic checks risk turning the country into a non‑Jewish or non‑democratic state.
  2. A secure two‑state outcome is technically compatible with Israel’s security and is more achievable if pursued now with U.S. backing and cooperation from moderate Arab states; waiting only narrows Israel’s options.
  3. Iran remains a long‑term nuclear risk but its breakout timeline has been delayed, so Israel should use this window to build regional and U.S. coordination and treat military strikes as a last resort.
The Octavian Report 0 implied HN points 23 Dec 25
  1. Recent U.S. retreat and perceived weakness have encouraged rivals like Russia, China, and Iran to push boundaries, raising the risk of dangerous miscalculation. The next U.S. leader needs to reassert American resolve quickly to deter aggression.
  2. Assad’s brutal repression helped create and strengthen ISIS by driving Sunni recruitment, and U.S. inaction opened a vacuum others filled. The U.S. should more strongly degrade ISIS, back reliable local partners, and consider measures like safe zones or no‑fly zones instead of legitimizing Assad.
  3. Western and generational shifts have eroded support for Israel, amplified by misleading claims about settlements and continued Palestinian incitement. Applying concrete consequences for official incitement and clearer U.S. backing would alter how Europe and Democrats engage with the issue.
The Octavian Report 0 implied HN points 23 Dec 25
  1. Unpredictable, contradictory policy decisions have eroded U.S. credibility, making allies doubt commitments and giving adversaries room to exploit American inconsistency.
  2. A small, sustained U.S. presence in northeast Syria and Iraq helps prevent the return of ISIS and protects local partners, but withdrawing forces without a clear, resourced strategy risks instability and undoing hard-won gains.
  3. Long-term competition with China and managing threats like Iran require stronger alliances and more investment in diplomacy; cutting diplomatic resources and acting unilaterally weakens U.S. power.
The Weekly Gazette 0 implied HN points 12 Dec 25
  1. Online spaces are a frontline for gender-based violence: women face constant harassment, doxxing, impersonation, sexualized threats, and coordinated smear campaigns.
  2. Armed conflict amplifies and globalizes digital attacks: when violence escalates online abuse surges, crosses borders, and platforms often fail to protect or wrongly remove victims' content.
  3. Digital attacks have real-world consequences and strip identity: online violence can lead to surveillance, physical danger, social exclusion, and requires action against platforms and algorithms as part of stopping harm.
The Weekly Dish 0 implied HN points 27 Feb 26
  1. Israel might choose to launch another war against Iran, framing it as a "war of choice" rather than a defensive necessity.
  2. Such a attack would be a last-ditch, desperate move that reflects a country increasingly isolated as it loses American support.
  3. Pursuing that path would be a high-stakes gamble with major regional and global consequences.
Numb at the Lodge 0 implied HN points 07 Mar 26
  1. An empire is like a national manic episode—full of grandiosity, recklessness, and the conviction that disaster only happens to other people.
  2. Contemporary American imperialism often prefers killing and high-tech force over negotiation, treating other states as disposable and old rules as meaningless.
  3. That approach shreds societies, breeds chaotic militias and state collapse, and produces unpredictable blowback that ultimately harms global stability and the empire itself.