The hottest US Foreign Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top World Politics Topics
Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 1929 implied HN points • 06 Mar 26
  1. The US has begun bombing Iran and claims fast success, while Iran has retaliated across the region but with a largely ineffective showing.
  2. Trump is loudly taking personal credit for the strikes and even talks about influencing who replaces Iranian leaders, treating the conflict like a personal victory lap.
  3. The war is reshaping American politics: some GOP figures are being sidelined into symbolic 'war room' roles while older leaders keep control, leaving parts of the Republican right politically damaged.
Seymour Hersh • 26 implied HN points • 24 Mar 26
  1. The US-Israel bombing campaign has already disrupted global energy and shipping, causing fuel shortages and halting much traffic through the Strait of Hormuz.
  2. Iran seems to lack strong anti-aircraft defenses so far, so strikes have been largely uncontested, but Iran has not surrendered and the conflict could become prolonged and uncertain.
  3. Decision-makers missed unpredictable risks — the “unknown unknowns” — leading to unforeseen strategic and economic fallout and raising doubts about leadership competence.
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 1960 implied HN points • 18 Feb 26
  1. Israel is threatening to resume full-scale bombing of Gaza unless Hamas disarms, but Hamas has never agreed to give up its weapons, putting both sides on a collision course toward renewed mass violence.
  2. The United States allowed the last remaining nuclear arms treaty with Russia to collapse, a development that makes the world far more dangerous than the repeated alarms about Iran.
  3. U.S. imperialism and regime‑change operations push other countries to clamp down and restrict freedoms to resist foreign infiltration, so American actions often make the world more authoritarian.
Phillips’s Newsletter • 208 implied HN points • 09 Mar 26
  1. The US and Israeli air campaign has severely degraded Iranian air defenses, missile and drone capabilities, and targeted Iranian leaders, but it’s not clear what political or military end state those strikes are meant to achieve.
  2. Public messaging from US leadership is contradictory—claims of victory and surrender are mixed with admissions the war is ongoing—so it’s hard to tell whether the chaos is genuine or deliberate misdirection.
  3. This mix of coercive strikes and noisy signaling mirrors what was done in Venezuela and will be a litmus test in Iran for whether this emerging US doctrine actually achieves its strategic aims.
Aaron Mate • 196 implied HN points • 02 Mar 26
  1. The US and Israel launched "Operation Epic Fury" to pursue regime change in Iran, carrying out assassinations and bombings that caused heavy civilian casualties and quickly widened the fighting across the region.
  2. What looked like diplomacy was largely a cover, as US negotiators pretended to seek a deal while preparing military strikes and undermining a possible agreement.
  3. The official reasons for war — that Iran was on the brink of a nuclear weapon or an imminent missile threat — were exaggerated or false, suggesting the action is ideologically driven and risks a catastrophic, open-ended conflict.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 287 implied HN points • 20 Jan 26
  1. Europeans are unusually alarmed by the idea of the U.S. moving to take Greenland, fearing it could signal a broader breakdown in the international order and inspire other territorial grabs.
  2. There is a practical logic to the move: the U.S. worries Europe can’t defend the Arctic as ice melts and new routes open to China and Russia.
  3. Breaking the U.S.-Europe alliance would mainly help rivals like China, Russia, and Iran, and Europe is likely to back down when faced with threats such as a catastrophic trade war.
The Chris Hedges Report • 149 implied HN points • 15 Jan 26
  1. The UN resolution effectively erases decades of international law on the occupation and hands governance of Gaza to a new “Board of Peace” led by Trump, undermining Palestinian claims to self-determination.
  2. The resolution’s conditions—disarmament preconditions, veto power for Israel, and an international stabilization force—make meaningful aid, reconstruction, and Israeli withdrawal unlikely, so humanitarian collapse and forced displacement will continue.
  3. Many states backed the resolution due to geopolitics and pressure, but organized politics, free speech, and grassroots mobilization are presented as the remaining avenues to resist and try to reverse these outcomes.
John’s Substack • 14 implied HN points • 07 Mar 26
  1. Netanyahu and Trump lack a coherent strategy to win the US-Israeli war against Iran, so Iran is likely to come out ahead.
  2. President Trump made a major blunder by taking the United States into war with Iran.
  3. Even a pro-Israel leader like Joe Biden refused to attack Iran in April and October 2024, resisting Israeli efforts to draw him in.
Taipology • 124 implied HN points • 04 Jan 26
  1. The US carried out a rapid, low-casualty removal of Maduro that looked like a polished PR victory and may have relied on deals or a military stand-down rather than heavy fighting.
  2. This action signals a push to reassert US dominance in Latin America — aiming to secure influence, resources, and compliant governments while European actors largely appeased it.
  3. China is unlikely to directly intervene over Venezuela, and the episode won’t by itself reshape BRICS or Taiwan policy; the bigger contest will be economic and strategic control of supply chains and resources, with Venezuela’s political future still uncertain.