The hottest Apology Substack posts right now

Jessica DeFino retracted a guest essay due to plagiarism concerns.
The removed essay was replaced with a recommendation to read an article by Dina Nayeri.
The focus of The Unpublishable is on original reporting in the beauty space.

The author apologized to Charles Foster for misreading his piece on psychedelia.
The author quoted a comment from Charles Foster's article on psychedelics.
The author highlighted the importance of not inhibiting research on psychedelics.

The online literary community is evolving with readerships shrinking, posing a challenge for writers.
It is essential to adapt to the changing landscape of writing and readership.
Consider offering free trials to attract more readers and grow your audience.

Voters often demand political apologies but don't always accept them, leading to a paradox. Despite this, there are valid reasons for demanding apologies even when acceptance is unlikely.
Conditional apologies, though controversial, can still be considered genuine apologies as they reflect an acceptance of facts, remorse, a desire for improvement, and a commitment to change.
Politicians sometimes apologize for historical events they weren't personally involved in to acknowledge narrative connections and prevent the risk of causing expressive harm by remaining silent.

A crucial line in the study was misread, leading to the need for a retraction of the article.
The article incorrectly claimed that unvaccinated people were part of the study, when in fact all participants were vaccinated.
The broader point still stands that there is increasing evidence vaccines may not prevent deaths once they stop preventing infection.

Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity: