The hottest Judicial Power Substack posts right now

The Supreme Court recently ruled on nationwide injunctions, which are legal orders that can block government actions across the country. This decision may have a big impact on President Trump's agenda and his policies.
President Trump celebrated the ruling as a major win for the Constitution, stating it helps support his presidency. In contrast, some justices believe this ruling poses a serious threat to the rule of law.
This case could shape how future challenges to laws and executive orders are handled in courts, which affects who gets to decide what laws apply across the nation.

Trump is changing how the executive branch works, using power in new ways that could impact future presidents. He wants to control parts of the government, like USAID, and has plans for the Department of Education.
There's a long history of presidents not spending money that Congress gives them, called impoundment. This can change how money is spent and can lead to a stronger executive branch.
The balance of power in the government is shifting. Just like how the Supreme Court influenced laws in the past, Trump's actions could redefine what future presidents can do.

The Supreme Court's recent rulings could have negative real-world consequences.
The Court's decisions show a disregard for established legal principles like precedent and standing.
Public trust in the Court is decreasing due to perceived overreaching and lack of restraint.

Judicial decisions are complicating how the U.S. can protect itself from foreign threats. They require lengthy individual hearings for people illegally inside the country, making it harder to respond quickly.
The unclear legal situation means the government struggles to tell the difference between regular migrants and potential dangers. This creates big security risks for the country.
Experts believe that these legal rulings might undermine the U.S.'s basic right to defend itself. They call for changes in the law or interpretations to restore the balance of power and national security.

The judiciary relies on U.S. sovereignty to function, but when it blocks the Executive's actions against foreign threats, it weakens its own authority.
Judicial rules requiring due process can slow down enforcement efforts, allowing adversaries to take advantage of the system and create zones of lawlessness.
When courts prevent the government from removing foreign actors, they unintentionally accept their presence and power, which undermines U.S. sovereignty.

Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity: