Autodidact Obsessions

Autodidact Obsessions delves into geopolitical dynamics, military strength assessments, economic analyses, and ideological scrutinies with a recurrent focus on Russia's global ascendency, the geopolitical implications of financial partnerships, the critique of Western ideologies, and historical reinterpretations of conflicts and migrations. It frequently challenges mainstream narratives around national and international issues.

Geopolitical Dynamics Military Strength Assessments Economic Analyses Ideological Critiques Russia’s Global Influence Financial Partnerships Western Ideologies Historical Reinterpretations Mainstream Narrative Challenges

The hottest Substack posts of Autodidact Obsessions

And their main takeaways

Palestinianism as Moral Cargo Cult Part 2

8 implied HN points • 30 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics International relations Ideology Conflict Studies Human Rights Nationalism
  1. Palestinianism is framed as an ideology that denies Jewish sovereignty while claiming to be a movement for liberation. It primarily focuses on opposition rather than building positive goals.
  2. The concept of jihad has been redefined within Palestinianism to support an endless conflict against Israel, stripping away its ethical constraints and promoting violence.
  3. Palestinianism utilizes moral language and human rights rhetoric to mask its core antisemitic beliefs, often portraying emotional narratives to garner support while ignoring factual truths.

ADDENDUM E: Suspension of Habeas Corpus Under Article I, Section 9 – Constitutional Tools for National Defense

12 implied HN points • 21 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Constitution Judiciary National Security Civil Liberties
  1. The Constitution allows for the suspension of habeas corpus during times of invasion or rebellion. This means that in emergencies, judicial processes may need to take a backseat to national security.
  2. Historical cases show that leaders have the authority to act swiftly during crises, even without waiting for approval from Congress. This is to ensure the country's safety when traditional methods might fail.
  3. Modern threats like covert operations and illegal foreign police activities can be seen as a form of invasion. If the government can't suspend habeas corpus during such times, it risks losing the ability to protect its own sovereignty.

Decapitation Strike Part 2

8 implied HN points • 27 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Immigration Security Defense Legislation Civil Rights
  1. The U.S. assumes its military strength can handle any threats, but it overlooks how vulnerable it can be to surprise attacks from within.
  2. Illegal immigration and modern technology could allow hostile groups to easily infiltrate and organize in the U.S. without detection.
  3. The current legal framework protects these infiltrators, creating a situation where even a massive armed presence could go unnoticed until it's too late.

Decapitation Strike Part 1

8 implied HN points • 27 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Immigration Security Legislation Military Judiciary
  1. There are new ways for hostile groups to infiltrate a country without needing a military. They can use existing immigration systems and legal frameworks to hide their movements.
  2. Technology and loopholes in laws allow these groups to arm themselves and communicate effectively without being detected. This makes them more dangerous.
  3. The current legal and administrative systems are not prepared to handle such threats, making a country vulnerable to internal attacks from organized groups growing right under its nose.

ADDENDUM J: The Dormancy of the Suspension Clause – A Constitutional Emergency Provision Courts Refuse to Apply

8 implied HN points • 21 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Constitutional Law Judiciary National Security Legislation Civil Rights
  1. The Suspension Clause of the Constitution allows for temporary suspension of legal protections during invasions or rebellions. However, courts today often ignore modern threats that qualify for this action.
  2. Judicial decisions have made it hard for the government to respond to illegal immigration and foreign threats. This lack of action weakens national security and gives foreign criminals more rights than U.S. citizens.
  3. There is a call for Congress and the Executive to clarify how the Suspension Clause applies to current threats. Courts need to acknowledge these dangers so that the necessary constitutional measures can be used effectively.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

ADDENDUM C: Unauthorized Foreign Police Operations and the Erosion of U.S. Sovereignty

8 implied HN points • 21 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics National Security Foreign Relations Legal Framework Law enforcement
  1. Unauthorized foreign police operations, like Chinese police stations in the U.S., threaten American sovereignty. They can bypass U.S. laws and authority.
  2. These foreign actions dilute the power of the President and Congress over foreign affairs, which is a key part of the U.S. Constitution.
  3. Having foreign law enforcement in the U.S. undermines the local police's authority and can create confusion in how justice is administered.

ADDENDUM B: Rebuttal to Common Legal Justifications for Judicial Constraints on Executive Immigration Authority

8 implied HN points • 21 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Immigration Judicial Executive Power National Security
  1. Judicial constraints on the Executive Branch's immigration authority can create challenges in handling national security threats. It's suggested that these legal arguments are sometimes misapplied.
  2. Due process rights for non-citizens do exist, but they don't always apply in national security situations. Courts need to balance these rights with the need to protect the country.
  3. The law gives the President certain powers to act quickly in emergencies, but this is often limited by court decisions. It's important to find a better balance between legal rights and national sovereignty.

Addendum A: Case Study – Strategic Exploitation of Judicial Ambiguity by Foreign Paramilitaries

8 implied HN points • 21 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Judicial system Immigration National Security Political strategy Foreign Relations
  1. Judicial ambiguity in immigration laws can be used by foreign paramilitary groups to enter the U.S. undetected. This makes it hard for authorities to respond quickly to potential threats.
  2. Once inside, these groups can set up operations and blend into communities using black-market activities. This allows them to gain power and influence without being immediately noticed.
  3. The current legal standards prioritizing individual hearings for immigrants slow down the ability to enforce immigration laws. This creates vulnerabilities in national security and operational effectiveness.

Invasion USA

8 implied HN points • 21 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics National Defense Constitutional Law Immigration Policy
  1. Judicial decisions are complicating how the U.S. can protect itself from foreign threats. They require lengthy individual hearings for people illegally inside the country, making it harder to respond quickly.
  2. The unclear legal situation means the government struggles to tell the difference between regular migrants and potential dangers. This creates big security risks for the country.
  3. Experts believe that these legal rulings might undermine the U.S.'s basic right to defend itself. They call for changes in the law or interpretations to restore the balance of power and national security.

Palestinianism as Moral Cargo Cult Part 1

4 implied HN points • 30 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Nationalism Identity politics Conflict Ideology History
  1. Palestinianism is portrayed as a movement for liberation and rights, but it is argued to be more about rejecting Jewish sovereignty rather than a true ethnic identity.
  2. Historically, the idea of a distinct Palestinian identity grew much later than Jewish claims to the land, often being defined by opposition to Zionism.
  3. The rhetoric around Palestinianism often inverts moral responsibility, where acts of aggression are presented as victimhood, complicating dialogue and accountability.

Invasion USA: With All Addendums

4 implied HN points • 21 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Immigration Constitutional Law Sovereignty National Security
  1. Invasion occurs when a group of foreigners enters a country and undermines that country's authority. It's not about individual reasons but the collective impact of the group and its backers.
  2. There are phases to this invasion. First, a small group secures a foothold, and then larger groups follow, often leading to a shift in local control and politics.
  3. Legal systems can slow down any response to such invasions. Each individual's case can take years in court, making it hard to act against the larger threat to a nation's sovereignty.

ADDENDUM P: The Semantic Collapse of “Invasion” and the Constitutional Consequences of Legal Denial

4 implied HN points • 21 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Constitutional Law Legal issues National Security Government Structure Political theory
  1. The concept of 'invasion' is too narrowly defined in legal terms today, making it hard to deal with modern security threats. We need to rethink what 'invasion' means to include more than just traditional military attacks.
  2. Current legal interpretations don't cover many real threats we face, like undercover paramilitary groups or cyber-attacks. This limits the government's ability to respond effectively to those threats.
  3. To protect the Constitution and ensure national security, we should redefine 'invasion' to include any attempts to harm the country, even if the attackers aren't wearing uniforms or are acting in disguise.

ADDENDUM O: THE PARADOXES OF POLICE POWER, JUDICIAL SELF-UNDERMINING, AND SOVEREIGNTY

4 implied HN points • 21 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Sovereignty Law enforcement Immigration Constitutional Law
  1. The judiciary relies on U.S. sovereignty to function, but when it blocks the Executive's actions against foreign threats, it weakens its own authority.
  2. Judicial rules requiring due process can slow down enforcement efforts, allowing adversaries to take advantage of the system and create zones of lawlessness.
  3. When courts prevent the government from removing foreign actors, they unintentionally accept their presence and power, which undermines U.S. sovereignty.

ADDENDUM N: SYSTEMATIC REBUTTAL TO CONSTITUTIONAL AND JURISPRUDENTIAL CHALLENGES

4 implied HN points • 21 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Constitutional Law Judiciary Executive Power Sovereignty National Defense
  1. It's important to test beliefs through debate; if they can't hold up, they may not be facts.
  2. Judicial rules can sometimes make it hard for the government to protect itself, especially during crises.
  3. The courts should recognize when their procedures hinder real security and adjust accordingly for national safety.

ADDENDUM M: Enemy Combatants in the Domestic Information Space – Restoring Executive Preemption over Judicial Adjudication

4 implied HN points • 21 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics National Security Legal Framework Political strategy Executive Power
  1. The U.S. President should be able to act quickly against domestic individuals who support foreign terrorist organizations, even if they are not armed.
  2. Judicial systems currently block the President from taking action against these individuals, making it hard to respond to national security threats.
  3. There needs to be a change in law to allow the President to label and deal with these domestic propagandists more effectively, without waiting for court approval.

ADDENDUM L: Constitutional Doctrines Under Assault and the Path to Restoration

4 implied HN points • 21 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Constitutional Law Immigration Judicial Review Political Rights
  1. Illegal immigrants have more legal protections than American citizens, making it hard for the government to enforce immigration laws.
  2. Current judicial decisions are weakening the structure of the Constitution, leading to more issues like illegal entry and crime without consequences.
  3. To fix these problems, changes in laws and court practices are needed to ensure that the Constitution works effectively for citizens.

ADDENDUM K: The Judicial Fabrication of a Right to Remain — Constitutional Mythmaking and the Collapse of Immigration Sovereignty

4 implied HN points • 21 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Immigration Judicial Sovereignty Legal Reform
  1. There is no actual constitutional 'right to remain' in the U.S. for illegal immigrants. This idea has been created through court interpretations over the years.
  2. Judicial actions have weakened immigration laws, allowing people who entered unlawfully to stay longer. Courts treat these issues as procedural, which complicates enforcement.
  3. To fix these issues, changes in laws and court interpretations are needed. This includes limiting judicial reviews and clarifying immigration policies.

ADDENDUM I: Judicial Nondelegation by Injunction – The Seizure of Immigration Policy through Judicial Fiat

4 implied HN points • 21 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Judiciary Immigration Constitution Policy Civil Rights
  1. The judiciary is taking over immigration policy, which should be decided by Congress and the Executive. Judges are using orders to block immigration actions instead of just interpreting laws.
  2. This shift is creating unequal treatment for citizens and non-citizens in legal contexts. Non-citizens often benefit from more lenient standards than U.S. citizens face.
  3. To fix this, we need to end broad court orders in immigration cases and let elected officials take back control of immigration policy and enforcement.

ADDENDUM H: The Erosion of the “Entry Fiction” Doctrine and Its Strategic Exploitation

4 implied HN points • 21 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Constitutional Rights Political theory Border control
  1. The entry fiction doctrine used to help keep illegal migrants from claiming rights in the U.S. This legal tool is now weakening, making it easier for some to use the courts.
  2. Undocumented migrants can now delay their removal from the U.S. due to legal protections, even if they entered illegally. This can be exploited by those with bad intentions.
  3. This shift has made it harder for the U.S. to control its borders. It creates an unfair situation where illegal entrants have more legal protections than some citizens.

ADDENDUM G: Constitutional Inequality in Enforcement – Citizens vs. Non-Citizens

4 implied HN points • 21 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Constitutional Law Immigration Policy Civil Rights
  1. There is a legal double standard that gives more protection to non-citizens compared to U.S. citizens. This means that undocumented immigrants can sometimes avoid harsher penalties that citizens would face for similar actions.
  2. Citizens often have fewer rights when it comes to processes like detention or bond hearings. They may be held longer and with less due process compared to non-citizens who are given quicker hearings.
  3. This inequality in how laws are applied can harm trust in the legal system and impact how citizens view their own rights. It suggests that the system is not treating everyone equally under the law.

ADDENDUM F: State Nullification and Constitutional Breakdown in Federal Immigration Enforcement

4 implied HN points • 21 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Immigration Policy Constitutional Law Federalism Judicial Review National Security
  1. States are creating laws that ignore federal immigration rules, which disrupts how immigration laws are enforced and can lead to dangerous situations.
  2. Sanctuary policies can create a two-tier legal system, making some areas safer than others and allowing illegal activities to continue unchecked.
  3. When courts do not enforce federal supremacy in immigration, it leads to a breakdown of the law, making it harder for the government to keep the country secure.

ADDENDUM D: Legal Asymmetry and Lawfare – How Judicial Doctrine Has Been Weaponized Against U.S. Sovereignty

4 implied HN points • 21 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Law Sovereignty Judiciary Immigration National Security
  1. Lawfare uses legal systems to undermine a country's ability to protect itself. People can exploit laws to achieve their goals without fighting.
  2. Judicial precedent has made it harder to tell enemies apart from civilians, which can weaken national security. This allows hostile actors to take advantage of legal protections.
  3. The balance of power within the U.S. government is shifting, with courts taking on roles that should belong to the President and Congress. This change can hamper effective enforcement of laws and keep the country vulnerable.

Armenia And Israel Versus Imperial Islam

20 implied HN points • 09 Oct 23
  1. Muslim nationalism is theocratic, and there is no such thing as secular Islamic nationalism.
  2. Hamas bases its war against Zionism on religious motivations, and their use of international law appeals is subversive.
  3. The Palestinian political agenda is Islamist, aiming for genocide of Jews and Christians.

Aryan Migrants

20 implied HN points • 28 Sep 23
  1. There is no such thing as the word 'invasion'
  2. Migrants are just seeking a better life
  3. History shows the impact of colonialism and racism on migrations

One Trillion Dollars In 2023: How Russia's Military Came To Outspend The United States Part 3

32 implied HN points • 22 Mar 23
  1. Russia's military spending is projected to outspend the United States in 2023, showcasing a significant and growing military power.
  2. Russian arms production and purchasing power parity suggest a major advantage in missile production compared to the US.
  3. Russia's industrial capacity and military spending have been underestimated, positioning it as one of the top global superpowers alongside the US and China.

Is The Palestinian Land Claim Valid?

16 implied HN points • 09 Oct 23
  1. Palestinians have one of the lowest mortality rates in the world.
  2. Many modern Palestinians immigrated to the area at the same time as Jews.
  3. Representative Palestinian bodies exclude Jews from having rights to the land.

Updated Russian Economy Estimate

16 implied HN points • 05 Oct 23
  1. The Russian economy estimate ranges from $4.868 trillion to $6.4211 trillion
  2. Changes in money supply and Ruble value impact economic estimates
  3. Inflation, imports, and military production play key roles in estimating Russian GDP

The Term 'Ethnic Cleansing' Tacitly Endorses Genocide

16 implied HN points • 28 Sep 23
  1. Mainstream journalists use the term 'ethnic cleansing' to endorse genocide by obfuscating its true meaning.
  2. The term 'ethnic cleansing' is a subjective and judgmental euphemism often used by journalists to describe mass violence.
  3. The term 'ethnic cleansing' was popularized to describe ethnic homogenization efforts and reveals biases and seething hatred under the guise of objectivity.

France: Is It Civil War, Invasion, Or Revolution?

20 implied HN points • 02 Jul 23
  1. France is facing potential civil war, invasion or revolution due to ethnic and political tensions.
  2. NATO's capitulation and conflict with Russia are impacting Europe.
  3. The rise of fascism in Europe is linked to issues with migration and socialist liberalism.

Russia Is Kingpin Of BRICS

20 implied HN points • 04 May 23
  1. Russia leads BRICS and is gaining from China's decoupling with the West.
  2. Russia is strengthening its financial power and dominance, particularly in key industries like arms, energy, and agriculture.
  3. BRICS countries, like India and Brazil, face challenges and limitations in shifting away from the Dollar trap.

Russia's Current Estimated GDP: $6.16 Trillion

16 implied HN points • 11 Jul 23
  1. Russia's current estimated GDP is $6.16 trillion.
  2. The Ruble has depreciated by 18% on the dollar since the start of the Ukraine War.
  3. There has been a 22.75% GDP increase in Russia over one year.

The Russian Financial Superpower Will Replace The US As China's Money Partner

20 implied HN points • 08 Apr 23
  1. Russia will replace the US as China's main financial partner due to China's financial troubles.
  2. China's financial markets are in trouble, with clogged debts and risky underwriting practices.
  3. China needs Russia for its commodities and to minimize its exposure to the US dollar.

Fake Coups, Real Purges

16 implied HN points • 01 Jul 23
  1. The power struggle in Russia involves factions like Statists and Fascists.
  2. Putin maintains control by purging disloyal cliques in the military.
  3. Russia's military spending and production capabilities have increased significantly.

Naziphobia

12 implied HN points • 11 Oct 23
  1. Naziphobia is a fear, prejudice, and hatred of Nazis that leads to hostility and intolerance.
  2. Political Islam achieves its aims through terrorizing free speech.
  3. Islamophobia and Naziphobia may be interconnected in some cases.

One Trillion Dollars In 2023: How Russia's Military Came To Outspend The United States Part 2

20 implied HN points • 22 Mar 23
  1. NATO underestimated Russia's military capacity and overestimated their own, leading to a miscalculation in the Ukraine conflict.
  2. Ukraine's culture of corruption has impacted its economy and government, with concerns raised about President Zelensky's leadership.
  3. Efforts to calculate Russian military spending are complex and shrouded in uncertainty, with various sources presenting conflicting figures.