The hottest Moral dilemmas Substack posts right now

Utilitarianism suggests that we should act in ways that maximize overall happiness. This means if you can save five people by sacrificing one, it might seem like the right choice to push the one off the bridge.
Some arguments challenge the idea of not pushing someone off the bridge. For example, if pushing them means saving more lives, it may not be wrong to do so.
The concept of 'undoing' actions also plays a role. If you push a person off the bridge but can pull them back before harm is done, it challenges whether that initial push was truly wrong.

G.A. Cohen questioned the equal right of everyone to condemn terrorist attacks, highlighting the complexity of moral standing in such situations.
Cohen's analysis of Israeli-Palestinian conflict suggests that those responsible for injustices may lack the moral standing to condemn actions that result from the grievances they caused.
The argument presents a thought-provoking analogy involving responsibilities and moral condemnations in a hypothetical scenario, challenging the notion of moral authority in certain situations.

The article discusses the connection between deep atheism and the desire for control, particularly in the context of AI risk.
It explores the theme of power-seeking and control in rationalist and accelerationist ideologies.
There is a cautionary tone about the risks and potential negative consequences of power-seeking and wanting too much control over the future.

Limiting storytelling structures can restrict your understanding of the world.
Being too focused on intellectual pursuits can lead to missing out on life's richness.
In the end, simple stories may be all that matter.

The author reflects on whether World War 2 was truly a 'Good War' and tackles the complexities and moral dilemmas associated with it.
The text discusses the idea that 'should' is a challenging concept to apply to historical events and wars, emphasizing the imperfections and chaos of the universe.
Despite acknowledging the propaganda and complexities surrounding World War 2, the author leans towards seeing their grandfathers as heroes for their role in the war.

Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

There is no consensus on the definition of morality, with various theories existing but no agreement reached.
Defining ethics is crucial for moral progress, as it forms the foundation for creating an ethical system.
Ethics is grounded in valuing freedom and reason, and moral dilemmas can be resolved by appealing to these principles.