The hottest Peace talks Substack posts right now

Israel is planning a major military takeover of Gaza, which many see as forced displacement of Palestinians rather than voluntary migration. Starving a population to make them leave is as harmful as violence.
Trump has the power to influence the situation in Gaza, but he has chosen to ignore the ongoing atrocities, which many believe makes him complicit.
The lies and propaganda surrounding the conflict are becoming unsustainable, and public sentiment is shifting. People are starting to see through the misinformation and questioning the narratives being presented.

Keir Starmer's shift in Labour's policy on Palestinian statehood is seen as rewarding Israel's actions and hindering peace talks.
Starmer's treatment of Israel and Palestine and his abandonment of support for Palestinian statehood has caused significant controversy.
The support for a two-state solution and lack of action against arms sales to Israel is viewed as a stalling tactic that does not address the ongoing conflict.

Open discussion about complex issues, like the war in Ukraine, is important. Without it, we can't find real solutions.
Different countries have various views on what 'Europe' means, affecting how they see issues like democracy and values.
The media often simplifies conflicts into good vs. evil, which can stop meaningful debate and compromise from happening.

Negotiations over Ukraine keep cycling through the same pattern: proposals look promising but stall on the hardest issues, especially territory, leaving Ukrainians frustrated and vulnerable.
Donald Trump and his envoys are driving a new peace push with trilateral talks, but Putin appears willing to engage in talks mainly to avoid blame rather than to make major concessions.
Zelensky is trying to stay constructive so any failure looks like Russia's fault, yet without stronger pressure on Moscow the same stalemate may repeat; the Abu Dhabi talks could address substance but the crucial last 10% is still unresolved.

A prominent U.S. dealmaker is promoting a "peace through profit" plan that aims to end the war by turning Russia and Ukraine into business partners.
He argues that shared economic gains and interdependence would create incentives for lasting peace because everyone would benefit.
Critics warn this approach may be naive since Putin’s inner circle could have different motives and secretive ties with Russian elites might undermine or corrupt any deal.

Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

Zelensky is publicly refusing to cede the Donbas to Russia and has suggested holding a national vote or elections so Ukrainians can decide the region's fate.
A Ukrainian-administered referendum would likely exclude most people who now live in Donbas because they are under Russian control, so such a vote wouldn’t capture the region’s current residents.
Ukraine had earlier chances—most notably the 2015 Minsk accords—to keep Donbas inside Ukraine with limited autonomy (and forego NATO aspirations), but successive governments rejected that compromise and pursued military options instead.

China & Russia are challenging US dollar hegemony by promoting trade in yuan and national currencies
Bilateral trade between China and Russia is rapidly growing, hitting record highs and expected to surpass $200 billion in 2023
Russia is expanding energy cooperation with China, exemplified by projects like the Power of Siberia gas pipeline

Russia and Ukraine are both under severe economic and military stress, and their leaders now appear willing to negotiate a settlement to end the war. Talks focus on a handful of major unresolved points that could determine each country’s future.
US envoys are brokering a deal to release more than $250 billion in frozen Russian assets, with proposals that a new US-led entity would oversee reconstruction, take a large share of profits, and select contractors. The plan reportedly would keep reconstruction funds out of Russian hands.
Career diplomats and officials, notably State Department planners and Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll, are driving the breakthrough while the US president is largely detached, and Putin is under growing domestic and military pressure that limits his options.

Ukraine's territorial gains against Russia come at a high cost and may not be sustainable long-term.
Reducing economic engagement with China and Russia through 'decoupling' can increase the likelihood of conflict.
One ambitious strategy to address global warming involves placing a large umbrella in outer space.

Diplomatic efforts are unlikely to produce a peace deal right now because the main parties’ demands are deeply opposed and neither side is willing to compromise.
A high-profile US 27-point peace proposal is being promoted, but Russia has not accepted it and has publicly rejected the plan as unacceptable.
Real diplomacy will likely only become possible after a major battlefield development forces both sides toward an armistice, probably turning the hot war into a frozen conflict.

Ukraine is under intense pressure to accept a U.S.-brokered 28-point peace framework that would cede territory, limit its military, and bar NATO membership, with threats to cut intelligence and weapons if it refuses. Many view the plan as forcing a humiliating surrender and Zelensky is publicly resisting it to defend sovereignty and dignity.
European leaders are outraged by a rival proposal to use frozen Russian assets for American-led reconstruction while taking a large share of the profits, a move seen as unethical and likely to derail EU efforts to fund Ukraine. That proposal risks fracturing Western support and wrecking a reparations loan plan.
Ceasefires in the Middle East remain fragile and the Phase II plan for Gaza — which depends on disarming Hamas, deploying an international stabilization force, and quickly rebuilding the Strip — faces huge political and operational hurdles. Without clear answers on who will govern, secure, and rebuild Gaza, the region risks renewed violence and a prolonged stalemate.