The hottest Polarization Substack posts right now

Donald Trump's behavior was not as constrained by institutions as originally thought.
Trump's willingness to flout the law and spread conspiracy theories sets a dangerous precedent in American politics.
The support for Trump reflects a growing dissatisfaction with the current political system.

Artificial intelligence and altered states play a major role in shaping our future.
Social impacts of AI include increased conflict, contagion, and polarization.
Navigating the impact of AI requires a nuanced perspective and understanding the structural changes underway.

It's important to focus on big ideas and worldviews rather than just specific policies. Talking about why we believe what we do can help us find common ground.
True community cannot exist if we only care for people who think like us. We need to extend love and safety to everyone, even those we disagree with.
Listening to personal stories is vital. Hearing from people's experiences can guide us in creating a supportive environment, especially for those facing challenges.

Highly educated individuals may not always make decisions based on facts or logic as commonly believed; they exhibit biases and are less likely to change their beliefs when presented with contradictory evidence.
The growing education divide between political parties does not necessarily indicate one party's superiority in terms of policy or effectiveness; being educated does not guarantee better political judgment.
Academics and intellectuals should be wary of elitism and condescension towards less educated individuals and their political views, as education level does not always correlate with rational or informed political leanings.

Universities can address polarization and free speech issues on and off campus.
For a liberal society, universities should actively foster a culture of free speech and tolerance.
Despite challenges, universities play a crucial role in challenging students with diverse ideas and helping them evaluate beliefs.

Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

The system of government is designed to prevent majority rule, which can sometimes hinder consensus. There are many features, like the filibuster, that make it harder for one party to dominate policy-making.
People often focus on the filibuster as the main reason for legislative gridlock, but it might not be as crucial as other factors. Even without it, there can still be significant barriers to passing laws.
Removing the filibuster won't necessarily lead to more compromise. Instead, it could change how power operates in Congress without improving representation or leading to better decision-making.