The hottest Research Ethics Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top World Politics Topics

Peter Boghossian | The War on Science Interviews | Day 16

Critical Mass • 3 implied HN points • 09 Aug 25
🔬 Science Research Ethics
  1. There will be 20 interviews released over 20 days that discuss issues impacting science and academia.
  2. The interviews will touch on important topics like free speech, social justice, and the effects of cancel culture on universities.
  3. The goal is to spark conversation about restoring trust and quality in academia and science to fight against current challenges.

Alessandro Strumia | The War on Science Interviews | Day 14

Critical Mass • 3 implied HN points • 07 Aug 25
🔬 Science Research Ethics
  1. The series features 20 interviews with authors discussing the challenges facing science and scholarship today. They explore topics like academic integrity and how social justice activism can impact research.
  2. These dialogues aim to raise awareness about the damage being done to scientific progress and the importance of free speech in academia. The discussions are direct and thought-provoking.
  3. The project encourages public engagement and aims to restore trust in science and scholarship. It's a call for academics to unite and address the internal issues affecting universities.

Frances Widdowson | The War on Science Interviews | Day 10

Critical Mass • 3 implied HN points • 02 Aug 25
🔬 Science Research Ethics
  1. The interviews focus on serious issues affecting science and education today. They aim to encourage discussion about how to improve trust and integrity in academia.
  2. The authors discuss problems like cancel culture, ideological bias in science, and challenges to free speech in academic settings. These issues are seen as harmful to the progress of science.
  3. The goal is to raise awareness about current threats to scientific inquiry and scholarship. The hope is to unite people in restoring sound science and open conversation in universities.

Nicholas Christakis | The War on Science Interviews | Day 3

Critical Mass • 3 implied HN points • 25 Jul 25
🔬 Science Research Ethics
  1. A series of interviews are being released with authors who have contributed to a book about the challenges facing science today.
  2. Topics discussed in these interviews include issues like free speech, political influence on academia, and problems with how science is being practiced and communicated.
  3. The goal of these dialogues is to spark conversations about restoring trust and sound practices in science within universities.

Bad Storms, Bad Science

Natural Selections • 12 implied HN points • 22 Oct 24
🔬 Science Research Ethics
  1. Climate science often relies on models that may not fully prove human actions are the main cause of temperature increases. It's important to question what we assume about these models.
  2. Some media outlets present conclusions about climate change as facts, which can mislead people. They may not explore other possible reasons for climate events.
  3. True science should consider multiple explanations for observations instead of insisting on a single cause. It's essential to keep an open mind in scientific discussions.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

What would happen if the government required AI models to tell the truth?

Steve Kirsch's newsletter • 10 implied HN points • 08 Nov 24
🏥 Health Politics Research Ethics
  1. If AI models had to tell the truth, we could expect more honest answers to important questions. This could change how we interact with technology and rely on its information.
  2. There have been claims and studies suggesting a link between vaccines and autism, but many scientists disagree. It's a complex issue that needs more open research.
  3. Government oversight of AI and medical research could ensure better transparency and accountability. This would help the public trust information provided by these systems.

Roger Cohen and Amy Wax | The War on Science Interviews | Day 15

Critical Mass • 1 implied HN point • 08 Aug 25
🔬 Science Research Ethics
  1. The interviews focus on big problems in science and academia today. They discuss how social issues and activism sometimes hurt scientific progress.
  2. Many notable scholars are featured, each sharing their views on how to improve trust and free speech in universities. They hope these discussions can spark change.
  3. Even with new political challenges to science, the long-standing internal issues need attention too. The goal is to restore good practices and integrity in academic research.

Is AI going to kill us all? An FAQ

The Future of Life • 0 implied HN points • 30 Mar 23
🕹 Technology Research Ethics
  1. AI has the potential to be very dangerous, and even a small chance of catastrophe is worth taking seriously. Experts have different opinions on how likely this threat is.
  2. Pausing AI research isn't a good idea because it could let bad actors gain an advantage. Instead, it's better for responsible researchers to lead the development.
  3. We should focus on investing in AI safety and creating ethical guidelines to minimize risks. Teaching AI models to follow humanistic values is essential for their positive impact.

The CRU Scandals: A Reflection on Academia

Musings on Markets • 0 implied HN points • 28 Nov 09
🚌 Education Research Ethics
  1. Academic research often prioritizes getting published over exploring interesting questions. Researchers might choose to work on safe topics that are easier to publish instead of tackling big, challenging ideas.
  2. Bias can affect research outcomes. Researchers bring their own perspectives and preconceptions, which can influence what they study and how they interpret data.
  3. The educational background and connections of a researcher can greatly impact their chances of getting published. Those from elite institutions or who have influential mentors often have better success in the publishing world.