The hottest State formation Substack posts right now

A shared American moral horizon — belief in hard work, getting ahead, and playing by the rules — lets many regional and lifestyle differences coexist, but the shift to a credentialed, post‑industrial economy has left large groups feeling cut off from that American Dream and its meaning.
New communication technologies and large-scale migration have weakened elite control over shared facts and authority, fueling populism and social instability while prompting elites to try to reassert control over the information sphere.
Violence and the struggle for force shaped most of human history, and only when states monopolized violence could societies shift status competition into commerce, innovation, and institutions; at the same time, high agreeableness can be exploited by very disagreeable people, so societies need a balance of trust and vigilance.

The nation-state order is failing to handle mass migration, ecological collapse, and rising inequality, while a few mega‑companies are eroding institutions and raising systemic risks.
Empires have historically justified domination in different ways—religion (Europe), property and commercial plunder (Britain), law (United States), and control of nature (China)—and those ideas enabled extraction at home and abroad.
Rather than disappearing, states are likely to be co-opted by techno‑feudal elites who combine technological power with the state's legal coercion to entrench control instead of expanding real power to ordinary people.

Early medieval castles were cheap, quickly built motte-and-bailey earth-and-timber forts that armies could throw up fast to secure conquered land.
Castles acted as forward operating bases and supply hubs spaced about a day’s march apart, letting armies resupply, garrison territory, and project power despite limited logistics.
Owning a castle concentrated military, judicial, and economic control, so castles crystallized local authority and helped centralize power even when rulers spent heavily to build them.

For most of human history people lived in small, largely egalitarian groups rather than in states with kings. Living under a state is a very recent and uncommon part of our species’ experience.
States only arose when special conditions — like control over easily stored resources — let a few people seize power, so agriculture did not inevitably produce states. Large, organized societies without kings have existed and still offer alternatives.
Modern 'democracy' as a state structure is different from the long-standing practice of collective decision-making, and genuine self-governing community life can exist without a state. State-backed notions of freedom can mask elite dominance and imperial claims.

Enduring economic inequality isn't inevitable; it arose when certain technologies and institutions—land‑limited production (like plows), proto‑states to enforce property, and slavery—made material wealth heritable and defensible.
For thousands of years after the Neolithic, aggressive egalitarian norms and institutions (communal storage, public eating, anti‑dynastic burials, even destroying productive assets) actively suppressed lasting inequality, but Bronze‑Age shifts broke those norms and made inequality durable.
The modern knowledge and care economy could either repeat Bronze‑Age enclosure through things like intellectual property or be steered toward greater equality by democracy, unions, social insurance, and redistributive policy, because stronger intergenerational transmission of material wealth nonlinearly amplifies inequality.

Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

The Vikings—by raiding, trading, and settling—helped turn scattered Scandinavian clans into the ancestors of new peoples and the building blocks of emerging countries. They created diasporas like Normandy, the Danelaw, and the Rus' through both violence and colonization.
Violence and the pursuit of treasure were central to state formation: sea-kings used raids to fund ships and armies, and military victory let rulers absorb rivals and consolidate larger realms.
Trade brought foreigners and ideas like Christianity, and rulers adopted the faith because it gave divine legitimacy and administrative tools; that religious unification helped pave the way for secular, bureaucratic nation-states.

A civilization-scale modernity machine was built to maximize legibility, making people, land, goods, time, beliefs, and violence enumerable and interoperable rather than prioritizing ideals like truth or justice.
That success generated unavoidable byproducts—too many actors (excess agency), too much information, and too much scale—which fragmented shared narratives and overwhelmed any single system's ability to integrate them.
After crossing a complexity threshold around 1600 the system began a phase transition into a different logic that favors divergence, proliferation, and local meaning, and this shift cannot be repaired from within the original machine.

Military competition in early modern Europe led to the development of expensive technologies and tactics for warfare.
The 'military revolution' thesis argues that military innovations drove state formation and European imperial success.
Critiques of the 'military revolution' thesis point out inaccuracies in details, but still acknowledge the significance of the evolution of military technology and political organization.