The hottest Think Tanks Substack posts right now

Trusted cross‑ideological collaborators who can credibly influence a hostile government are rare and often the only ones who can stop truly harmful policies, so avoid publicly shaming or driving them away.
Policy writing and advocacy meant to reach officials will sometimes need pragmatic, respectful framing rather than denunciations; demanding public condemnations or purity signals can destroy practical influence.
Keep ideological minorities inside movements instead of purging them, because they provide access and can win real improvements, and respect individuals’ ethical choices to engage rather than socially pressuring them to quit.

Many analysts from DC think tanks and NGOs are presented as neutral experts, but their funding sources and past advocacy can shape their views and those ties are often not disclosed.
Some organizations produce rigorous, policy-relevant research and advise government, while others have clear partisan, donor-driven, or foreign-linked agendas that push hawkish or activist positions.
With deeper U.S. involvement in the Iran conflict, media and readers need clearer transparency about who funds and influences cited experts so public debate isn’t shaped by hidden interests.

Labour Party operatives hired a PR firm to investigate several journalists, sparking a political scandal that led to a resignation and a formal government inquiry.
The Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) was a small UK-based group tied to Labour Together and British political operatives, yet it gained outsized influence in U.S. media and government through opaque relationships and funding.
Investigative reporting and leaked internal documents, aided by a whistleblower, triggered official actions including deportation proceedings and raised fresh concerns about cross-border influence and attempts to shape or censor public discourse.

Long-run poverty is often blamed on irresponsible behavior—especially strong present bias or high time preference—so many solutions focus on getting people to behave more responsibly or changing incentives.
Scholars dispute the key psychological root: some single out time preference, while others prefer a broader concept like impulsivity or low conscientiousness as the main behavioral cause.
There's a sharp divide over tractability: one view sees poverty as entrenched and hard to fix, while another believes tougher incentives and policies can gradually make irresponsible behavior more responsible.

Under-covered question in American politics: Policy initiatives post-2024 election are crucial.
Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 reveals conservative stance on policy.
Concerns raised about conservative direction in housing policy.

Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

China studies is drifting away from language skills, fieldwork, and primary sources, so much research is disconnected from the lived experience and context inside China.
Many younger researchers approach China with vigilance and a competition mindset instead of curiosity, which biases questions and pushes attention-grabbing policy claims over balanced understanding.
There is an unhealthy methodological imbalance—heavy reliance on quantitative models, overly narrow specialties, or vague grand-policy talk without historical and cultural grounding—leading to shallow analysis that can worsen mutual distrust.

Détente strategies, aimed at changing adversary behavior through engagement, have often failed. Instead of driving cooperation, they sometimes lead to misunderstandings and conflicts.
The U.S.-China relationship is complex due to economic interdependence, which requires careful balancing of cooperation and competition in areas like technology and national security.
Current tensions can lead to a stalemate where both sides avoid costly escalations. Finding rules for coexisting without conflict is essential for future stability.

RAND Corporation was once at the forefront of military and scientific research, making groundbreaking contributions in areas like game theory and defense strategy during the Cold War.
Over time, RAND has shifted its focus from cutting-edge scientific research to social and policy analysis, leading to a decline in its innovative output as it navigated new funding sources and political landscapes.
Despite its challenges, RAND continues to play a significant role in addressing modern security issues, adapting its research to tackle contemporary challenges like military capabilities and psychological impacts of war.

There's a noticeable shift in political attitudes towards military action against Iran, with some Democrats now supporting the idea of a military strike, unlike in the past when they were against it.
Using artificial intelligence in social media, like Meta did with AI-managed profiles, can backfire as users may find them creepy or untrustworthy.
Foreign policy think tanks in the US are being heavily funded by military contractors and foreign governments, which raises concerns about potential conflicts of interest.

The US needs to take Taiwan's defense seriously to prevent China from taking over. Taiwan is crucial for the US's credibility and is seen as a key part of stopping China's rise as a superpower.
Trump's focus on acquiring Greenland shows the US's need for strategic resources. Greenland has valuable minerals and its location is important for military surveillance against threats from Russia and China.
Funding for think tanks largely comes from special interests and foreign governments. This can affect the objectivity and independence of their research, raising concerns about who really influences US foreign policy.

Population control has been a big topic because of fears about too many people using up resources and harming the environment. Many believed that without control, we could face famine and poverty.
Think tanks and foundations like the Rockefeller Foundation pushed for population control strategies, believing it would help society manage resources better. They funded programs for family planning and education to promote smaller families.
Over time, the focus has shifted from controlling population to ensuring human rights and sustainability. Today, issues like sexuality and reproductive rights are central to discussions that were once about just managing growth.