The hottest Administrative state Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics
TK News by Matt Taibbi 8017 implied HN points 12 Dec 25
  1. A justice argued that Congress can create independent expert agencies to protect citizens by preventing presidents from replacing scientists, economists, and other specialists with political loyalists.
  2. The debate exposes a deep split between technocratic governance and democratic accountability. Should complex modern government be run by insulated experts or by officials answerable to voters?
  3. Recent Supreme Court moves to let presidents remove agency officials could shift power back to the executive and unsettle long-standing administrative protections. That change risks a slippery slope affecting many agencies and how government answers to the public.
Brad DeLong's Grasping Reality 384 implied HN points 27 Feb 26
  1. The Supreme Court is operating like a Trump‑era power machine, using textualist and originalist rhetoric to justify shadow‑docket emergency stays that let the executive act quickly and create facts on the ground.
  2. Justice Barrett often serves as the decisive swing vote and presents herself as a neutral originalist. In practice she frequently enables expansive presidential power in emergency decisions, letting policies take effect before courts resolve the merits.
  3. The justices divide into hardline authoritarians (Alito, Thomas), structural revolutionaries (Gorsuch), and technocratic enablers (Kavanaugh, Roberts) versus three principled liberal dissenters, and the net effect is weakened agencies, narrower protections for workers and marginalized groups, and outcomes that favor business and executive power.
Can We Still Govern? 311 implied HN points 17 Dec 25
  1. Authoritarian "move fast" tactics that break rules and purge experts are not efficient — they’re haphazard, erode institutions, and weaken the government’s ability to deliver public goods.
  2. Progressives need a clearer theory of power to overcome excessive proceduralism and get things done, but that power must be balanced by the rule of law and institutional safeguards rather than personalist authority.
  3. Broad measures of trust don’t reliably show government effectiveness because they’re driven by partisanship; people value procedural checks and participation, so accountability and targeted performance metrics matter more than generalized trust.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 352 implied HN points 09 Dec 25
  1. The Supreme Court may remove the legal limit that keeps presidents from firing officials of independent federal agencies, threatening agency independence.
  2. The case began when Trump tried to oust FTC commissioner Rebecca Slaughter and directly challenges a 90-year-old precedent that allowed removal only for cause.
  3. If the Court overturns that precedent, presidents could replace commissioners for political reasons and fundamentally reshape the administrative state.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 3399 implied HN points 11 Feb 25
  1. Angelo Codevilla introduced important ideas about a 'ruling class' in America, suggesting that this group has too much power and operates against ordinary citizens. His thoughts on this have changed the way people talk about politics today.
  2. Codevilla's influence can be seen in many government changes during Trump's administration, including shifts in foreign policy and reductions in federal positions. His students and followers are now in key roles, actively working on his ideas.
  3. Key political phrases like 'Deep State' and 'administrative state' originated from Codevilla. These terms have shaped how many people understand and discuss the current political landscape.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
apxhard 76 implied HN points 05 Jan 26
  1. Sustained abundance flattens selection pressure. Societies then prioritize reliability, procedure, and administration over risky experimentation, which makes them anti‑evolutionary.
  2. Diffuse procedural rules become an invisible, unaccountable elite that blocks learning; federalism can preserve local experimentation but shared currency and bailouts tend to collapse failure domains back into central control.
  3. To restore evolvability you must remove procedural overhang, concentrate responsibility, and make failure personally costly for elites; real evidence of success would be falling federal obligations, permanent deletion of institutions, legally protected state divergence, and local failures that are allowed to propagate.
Open Source Defense 84 implied HN points 27 Nov 25
  1. Overly complex permitting and regulation impose huge compliance costs and delays, often killing startups and slowing deployment of lifesaving technologies like clean energy and carbon removal.
  2. The physical world runs on a permission-first model where hundreds of officials and overlapping rules can quietly veto projects, so most real-world activity is effectively forbidden unless someone grants permission.
  3. People who see obvious regulatory harms are well placed to point out and push back against the less visible regulatory thickets that block innovation and harm public welfare.
Can We Still Govern? 993 implied HN points 07 Nov 24
  1. If Trump returns to office, he will likely make major changes to how federal workers are treated, possibly firing many and reclassifying them as political appointees. This could create a government that is less experienced and more loyal to his administration.
  2. Trump's second term may be more organized but still chaotic, with a focus on advancing his goals and possibly reducing regulatory oversight. However, this could lead to a decline in the quality of public services and less effective governance overall.
  3. Corruption might become more common under Trump, with personal interests overlapping with government duties. This could result in conflicts of interest becoming normalized, making it harder to hold him and his administration accountable.
The Truth Fairy 672 implied HN points 14 Jan 25
  1. Many people feel a strong dislike for government bullying and censorship. They believe that not everyone has the same freedoms based on their views.
  2. There are noticeable differences in how people's opinions are accepted or rejected by society. If your opinion aligns with the mainstream left views, you're less likely to be targeted or punished.
  3. Some of Trump's recent appointees have experienced being canceled by the government or society before. Their past experiences may help them fight against unfair treatment and broaden the conversation in America.
QTR’s Fringe Finance 33 implied HN points 30 Dec 25
  1. Separation of powers means executive agencies that wield real power must answer to the president, so the same legal logic used to limit other independent agencies applies to the Federal Reserve.
  2. The Fed runs core executive functions — regulating banks, shaping credit, and controlling the settlement asset — and appeals to history or technical expertise are prudential, not constitutional, reasons to shield it from political control.
  3. There are only two constitutionally consistent options: place the Fed under presidential oversight and accept political accountability, or remove discretion with strict automatic rules; the current system of discretionary, unaccountable central banking conflicts with separation of powers.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 579 implied HN points 21 Jan 25
  1. Tariffs raise prices for consumers, going against the goal of reducing inflation. It's a way for bureaucrats and lobbyists to benefit at the expense of everyday people.
  2. The system of tariffs is controlled by complex bureaucracies that aren't transparent. This means that the true impact and manipulation of tariffs can be hidden from public view.
  3. If someone wants to reduce the power of the government and its administration, getting rid of tariffs would be a good starting point.
Bruce Fein's Pioneering Lyceum 117 implied HN points 19 Jan 24
  1. The Supreme Court may change the rules for federal rulemaking, impacting how executive branch regulators interpret laws.
  2. Congress needs to take responsibility for writing clear laws to prevent excessive regulatory power.
  3. Requiring Congress to vote on all regulations would increase accountability and reduce the size of the administrative state.
From the New World 118 implied HN points 13 Nov 24
  1. Carl Schmitt's ideas focus on the importance of political legitimacy and how decisions can bypass normal rules during emergencies. This shows how power can shift unexpectedly during crises.
  2. The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated how government agencies can act without typical oversight, leading to questions about their legitimacy and effectiveness. It highlighted the tension between authority and accountability.
  3. Efforts to improve government efficiency often run into existing bureaucratic processes that hinder progress. New ideas, like the proposed Department of Government Efficiency, face challenges from established norms and resistance to change.
Who is Robert Malone 16 implied HN points 10 Feb 24
  1. The State Department is accused of censoring and limiting the circulation of disfavored press outlets, violating the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
  2. The lawsuit filed by media organizations like The Daily Wire and The Federalist alleges that the State Department is funding censorship technology to suppress certain American news outlets.
  3. The plaintiffs filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction to stop the Department of State from supporting technology that targets Americans' speech or press.