The hottest Foreign Policy Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top World Politics Topics

That leaked intelligence report

The Cosmopolitan Globalist • 20 implied HN points • 26 Jun 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. The recent intelligence report suggests that the U.S. military strikes on Iran did not fully destroy its nuclear program, and it may be back up and running in just a few months.
  2. There are strong debates about the effectiveness of the military action, with some claiming it only caused minimal setbacks, while others argue it inflicted significant damage on Iran's nuclear capabilities.
  3. Concerns about the accuracy and reliability of leaked intelligence reports highlight the potential for misinformation and confusion regarding national security matters.

June 21, 2025

Letters from an American • 21 implied HN points • 22 Jun 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. President Trump announced a military strike on Iranian nuclear sites, claiming it was a successful operation to eliminate Iran's nuclear threat.
  2. He emphasized that this attack aimed to make Iran agree to peace and warned of more severe actions if they did not comply.
  3. Trump celebrated the attack as a significant achievement for the U.S. military, asserting that it demonstrated superior military capability.

June 19, 2025

Letters from an American • 21 implied HN points • 20 Jun 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. The U.S. is facing tension with Iran over its nuclear program, especially after Trump pulled out of a previous deal. This has led to new rounds of negotiations and military actions.
  2. There is a divide among Trump's supporters regarding potential military intervention in Iran, with some opposing it while others see backing Israel as important for their beliefs.
  3. Congress is pushing back against Trump's power to unilaterally start a war, emphasizing that only they have the authority to make such serious decisions.

It's time to call this World War III

The Cosmopolitan Globalist • 56 implied HN points • 22 Nov 24
🌍 World Politics Foreign Policy
  1. The current situation is being compared to World War III, with serious threats to global peace. We need to recognize this and act to stop aggressors like Russia.
  2. Strength is crucial in dealing with Putin. History shows that he responds only to a strong defense, and if we show weakness, it could lead to bigger conflicts.
  3. The war in Ukraine affects not just Europe but also global security. If we abandon Ukraine, it could encourage other aggressor nations like China and Russia to pursue their goals, risking further instability.

Revisiting the Thucydides Trap

Gideon's Substack • 42 implied HN points • 05 Feb 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. America's current strategy against China may be pushing us closer to conflict, even if it makes logical sense. Each action taken against China can lead to more tension and responses from them.
  2. The idea of America being the top power is becoming less certain. Other countries might start to prefer working with China, which could weaken America's alliances and influence.
  3. Instead of trying to stay the dominant power, America might benefit from fostering relationships based on shared interests. This could lead to a more complex but stable global balance, instead of constant competition.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

The Deadly Duo

Diane Francis • 219 implied HN points • 25 Oct 21
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. The U.S. promises to defend Taiwan, but there's skepticism about whether that support will actually happen.
  2. President Biden's commitment to Ukraine is also doubted by Putin, who believes he can protect Russia's interests.
  3. Both Taiwan and Ukraine are seen as targets by bigger powers, highlighting the risks in global politics.

On American War

The Radar • 39 implied HN points • 30 Mar 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. Veterans often carry deep trauma and finding meaning in their suffering is a life-long journey.
  2. America's involvement in wars like Vietnam and subsequent conflicts reveal a pattern of costly misadventures fueled by misleading narratives and mismatched goals.
  3. The nation faces a critical need to engage in open, democratic debates about war and peace to break the cycle of perpetual conflict and the misuse of military force.

America's Fatal Flaw

Diane Francis • 259 implied HN points • 12 Jul 21
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. There's a debate within the U.S. government about how to deal with Russia. Some think we should be tougher, while others seem to want to be more lenient, which could lead to more Russian aggression.
  2. The current U.S. strategy toward Russia is seen as weak. Past actions, like backtracking on sanctions, made Russia feel empowered and might encourage further bad behavior.
  3. America's foreign policy is struggling to understand Russia's true nature. Unlike during the Cold War, today's leaders often lack the expertise or experience to effectively counter Russian threats.

Syria Proves To The World, The US Is The Terrorist We Should Be Hunting!

C.O.P. Central Organizing Principle. • 48 implied HN points • 22 Dec 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. The U.S. has been involved in foreign conflicts and actions that some believe are driven by self-interest rather than genuine efforts to combat terrorism.
  2. There are claims that terrorist groups like ISIS have ties to U.S. operations, suggesting a complicated relationship rather than straightforward opposition.
  3. Critics argue that the U.S. government's actions have caused suffering worldwide and question its moral authority to judge other nations.

Declinist Politics Part 2- A bite-sized piece

Theory Matters • 3 implied HN points • 19 Dec 25
🌍 World Politics Foreign Policy
  1. Chasing a lost imperial role has pushed Britain into bad foreign adventures and strategic mistakes, exemplified by Suez and the Iraq war.
  2. Economic and cultural shifts since the 1970s — especially Thatcherism and a muted New Labour — left Britain with stagnant growth, social strains, and a political appetite for fantasy remedies like Brexit.
  3. British politics is now fractured with low trust, chaotic budgets, and rising unemployment, and the remedy called for is steady, technocratic policymaking and listening to experts rather than political adventurism.

Why Bidenism Failed

JoeWrote • 44 implied HN points • 14 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. Biden promised that nothing would fundamentally change, which led to many Americans feeling that he didn't deliver the change they wanted. They were looking for something different from the status quo.
  2. Biden did have some successes, like creating jobs through the American Rescue Plan and appointing Lina Khan for antitrust actions. These moves showed a connection to progressive values but were seen as not enough.
  3. His foreign policy, especially regarding Israel, upset many people and overshadowed his domestic achievements. This led to frustrations that contributed to the Democratic party's losses in elections.

Be Careful What You Wish For: Gaza Edition

Gideon's Substack • 38 implied HN points • 12 Feb 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. Trump may be setting a trap for Israel by proposing a plan for Gaza that seems appealing but is unrealistic. It suggests removing a population without addressing how to actually do it.
  2. Many Israelis seem to support Trump's plan, thinking it will lead to a solution for Gaza. But this belief might backfire if they realize the plan can't actually happen.
  3. This situation could create a political mess for Israel in the future. If Trump's promises go unfulfilled, the Israeli people may seek someone to blame, leading to more instability.

Why power makes leaders see threats everywhere

Klement on Investing • 1 implied HN point • 23 Jan 26
🌍 World Politics Foreign Policy
  1. When leaders or states gain more power they often start seeing even weaker competitors as threats.
  2. That growing fear can push them to take preventive actions, like foreign interventions, which outsiders may view as illogical.
  3. Behavioural geopolitics shows this power‑fear dynamic helps explain modern big‑power behavior and challenges the idea that great powers always act the same way.

Commentator

Castalia • 79 implied HN points • 11 Dec 22
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. China has seen major protests, but the government is cracking down hard on them. Even though some COVID rules are easing, many are getting arrested or questioned for protesting.
  2. The recent protests in Iran are also facing harsh government pushback, leading to executions and continued unrest, highlighting a struggle for freedom in both countries.
  3. There's growing concern about how technologies like AI and military robots are being used. Many people worry that these advancements could lead to dangerous situations and ethical issues.

The Fire Next Time

KERFUFFLE • 53 implied HN points • 02 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. Gaza is facing severe destruction and human suffering. Many reports describe civilians being killed and families being torn apart during the conflict.
  2. The scale of military retaliation from Israel is unprecedented, causing not only immediate casualties but also long-term issues like famine and homelessness.
  3. This conflict involves global implications, especially for Americans, as U.S. support influences the situation, and we may have to deal with the consequences of these actions in the future.

Why Olaf Scholz is not a "peace Chancellor," why Ukraine still stands a good chance of getting their cruise missiles, and why the entire debate surrounding Taurus is such a riddle

eugyppius: a plague chronicle • 109 implied HN points • 05 Mar 24
🌍 World Politics Foreign Policy
  1. Olaf Scholz is not a 'peace Chancellor' as some perceive, with significant military aid to Ukraine, despite opposing certain weapons shipments. His low approval ratings and party struggle reflect the challenge he faces.
  2. The Taurus missile scandal in Germany has not conclusively hindered Ukraine's chances of acquiring cruise missiles. The leak has, however, intensified international pressure on Scholz to reconsider his stance.
  3. The debate surrounding the Taurus missile's significance has been plagued by the leak scandal, revealing security breaches and political consequences. The missile's effectiveness and the intense focus on it remain questionable.

The idea that Trump will undermine NATO conflicts with everything Trump actually did while he was in office

Michael Tracey • 111 implied HN points • 22 Feb 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. The idea that Trump will undermine NATO conflicts with his actual actions while in office, such as expanding NATO and increasing funding for it, showing a more supportive stance towards the alliance.
  2. Focusing on Trump's actual policy record is more factual and rational than getting caught up in his campaign rhetoric or social media posts, helping provide a clearer picture of his presidency.
  3. Despite common assumptions, Trump's support for American hegemony, including through NATO, does not align with the belief that he would dismantle the alliance, as evidenced by his actions and policies.

Henry Huiyao Wang on What the U.S. Election Outcome Means for China

Pekingnology • 52 implied HN points • 03 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. If Trump wins the election, he might raise tariffs on Chinese goods but could still seek cooperation on other global issues. This means there may be both challenges and chances for negotiation.
  2. If Harris wins, she will likely continue the Biden administration's approach, which emphasizes competition with China while avoiding major conflicts. This could lead to a stable but competitive relationship.
  3. No matter who wins, there’s room for the U.S. and China to collaborate on big global problems like climate change and peace initiatives. Finding common ground will be crucial for both countries moving forward.

Debate with Glen Weyl, NYC, 9/4

Gray Mirror • 13 implied HN points • 03 Aug 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. There's a debate happening in NYC about whether the U.S. should be governed by a CEO dictator. It's a big topic to consider.
  2. You can find some interesting foreign-policy podcasts featuring Peter Slezkine from the Stimson Center. They might give you new insights.
  3. For those into tech, there's a fun discussion about the origins of React, a popular JavaScript library. You don’t need to be a tech expert to enjoy it!

Disgrace

The Cosmopolitan Globalist • 32 implied HN points • 19 Feb 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. The discussions between the US and Russia could lead to a new peace deal for Ukraine, but many worry that Ukraine's interests are not being prioritized. It seems like decisions are being made without including Ukraine.
  2. Some people are really angry and feel betrayed by the US government because they think it’s ditching Ukraine to get close to Russia again. This has made many in Ukraine question their future and safety.
  3. There’s a sense that Trump is making concessions that might hurt Ukraine and Europe in the long run. People are concerned this will encourage Russia to continue its aggressive actions and undermine NATO's unity.

The Twelve-Day War

The Cosmopolitan Globalist • 15 implied HN points • 03 Jul 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. It's too early to judge Trump’s actions in the Middle East. We can't know the full impact of his decisions right now.
  2. While I think attacking Iran's nuclear facilities was a necessary move, it’s not a guarantee of long-term success. Trusting Trump to make the right choices moving forward is risky.
  3. I don't consider Trump a strategic genius just because he made a questionable good decision. His overall mindset and decisions still raise serious concerns.

By Toppling The Syria, The US Has Guaranteed The End Of America In The Middle East.

C.O.P. Central Organizing Principle. • 42 implied HN points • 08 Dec 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. The U.S. involvement in Syria may lead to negative consequences for America in the Middle East. People there could react strongly against Americans and their presence.
  2. There is a belief that American ignorance about its history and global actions contributes to its problems. Many feel that the U.S. needs to acknowledge its past mistakes and take responsibility.
  3. The current state of America's government and society is seen as corrupt. Some believe that a significant change is needed, potentially putting more power in the hands of indigenous people.

Weekend Update #64: Crunch Time in Washington

Phillips’s Newsletter • 110 implied HN points • 20 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. Washington is facing a critical moment in decision-making regarding aid for Ukraine amidst political tensions and pressure from Trump
  2. UK Conservatives' support for Ukraine is being questioned for being more performative than substantial, especially with Boris Johnson endorsing Trump
  3. Ukraine's adoption of 'Active Defense' strategy is gaining attention, with western officials attempting to influence Ukraine's military approach

Commentator

Castalia • 39 implied HN points • 26 May 23
🌍 World Politics Foreign Policy
  1. Putin's decision to invade Ukraine is linked to a shift in his beliefs and Ukraine's move towards the West. This brought the two into conflict.
  2. Many think Putin saw a chance to act when he believed the West, especially the U.S., was weak after events like the Afghanistan withdrawal.
  3. Despite the current challenges, Putin had a long period where he appeared strong on the world stage, influencing his risky decisions.

Blinken Drags Us Back To The Forestal Suicide Scandal & The US First Strike Gamble.

C.O.P. Central Organizing Principle. • 36 implied HN points • 04 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. Air Force General Curtis LeMay pushed for the U.S. to use nuclear weapons first against the Soviet Union, creating a lot of tension during the Cold War. He convinced others that the Soviets were planning to attack, even though they were mostly focused on defense.
  2. The current U.S. foreign policy seems to be repeating past mistakes by spreading fear of a Russian nuclear first strike, ignoring that Russia is moving toward missile technology that could make traditional nuclear weapons less relevant.
  3. Secretary of State Blinken appears to be continuing this dangerous strategy, which many believe is just a way to maintain Cold War-era tactics instead of seeking real solutions to today’s conflicts.

It Gets Worse.

Trying to Understand the World • 11 implied HN points • 06 Aug 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. Western leaders often focus on self-preservation rather than making tough decisions, like in the Ukraine crisis. This can lead to delays in addressing real issues while they try to avoid blame.
  2. The effectiveness of NATO is questionable as countries have different views and priorities, so collective decisions may become hard to reach. This divides their strategic interests and weakens their unity.
  3. The West has a blind spot towards understanding the motivations and reactions of others, especially Russia, leading to poor decision-making and unexpected consequences in international relations.

FORCE EVACUATION AND SMASH THE CAMPS

Seymour Hersh • 44 implied HN points • 20 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. Israel is pushing many people from the north of Gaza to the south while bombing continues. This has led to a big crisis for those who can't leave.
  2. There are plans for more control over Gaza and the West Bank, with a strong push from Israel's religious right. They want to change the situation to eliminate the idea of a two-state solution.
  3. Violence against Arab communities in the West Bank is increasing, making daily life very difficult for many families there.

‘I WOULD HAVE DROPPED THREE NUCLEAR BOMBS’

Seymour Hersh • 43 implied HN points • 21 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. The history of genocide influences current Israeli actions, leading to justification for extreme measures. Many Israeli leaders do not question this past influence.
  2. Some Israelis are unhappy with their government's actions, particularly Prime Minister Netanyahu, and believe he should face consequences for his corruption.
  3. The ongoing conflict impacts families directly, with many having served in the military and living under constant tension.

Soft Power and Smart Power

Comment is Freed • 103 implied HN points • 17 Jan 24
🌍 World Politics Foreign Policy
  1. Joseph Nye discusses the challenges of balancing academia and government roles, with a focus on time and power.
  2. Power has been a dominant issue in Nye's career, explored through concepts like soft power and interdependence.
  3. Nye and Bob Keohane analyzed how OPEC's non-military influence on global wealth showcased asymmetrical interdependence.

AFTER BIDEN

Seymour Hersh • 45 implied HN points • 07 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. Many voters preferred Trump over a flawed Democratic candidate. They want a change in direction, especially regarding foreign policy.
  2. The past Democratic leadership choices are criticized for lacking strong vice presidential candidates. This may have weakened their political position.
  3. There’s a belief that Trump may persist in some of Biden's policies, particularly regarding support for Israel, despite wanting to change the approach towards Ukraine.

Talking with Tucker Carlson

John’s Substack • 11 implied HN points • 31 Jul 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. The main topics discussed were the Ukraine war and the situation in Gaza. These issues are very complex and affect many people.
  2. The conversation also touched on the influence of the Israel lobby in politics. This raises questions about how certain interests shape decisions.
  3. Overall, the discussion highlighted urgent global events that deserve more attention and understanding.

A Proof / New York Times Conversation on Trump’s Second-Term Foreign Policy and the State of Global Security Post-Biden

Proof • 31 implied HN points • 18 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. Independent media is gaining popularity as people seek diverse information sources. Many are turning away from traditional corporate news outlets.
  2. The conversation focuses on former President Trump's potential foreign policy in a second term. It explores how global security may be affected after Biden's presidency.
  3. Understanding different viewpoints is important in discussing political matters. This discussion includes insights from various experts and journalists.

The Next President Should Ignore Trump's Ukraine "Peace Plan"

I Might Be Wrong • 3 implied HN points • 26 Nov 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. Sometimes leaders ignore treaties and agreements, causing big problems later on. History shows that ignoring such deals can lead to serious conflicts.
  2. If a future president feels that a peace agreement is unfair, they might consider it okay to dismiss it. It's a tricky issue that brings up ethical questions about upholding agreements.
  3. Treaties often seem to be broken or disrespected, especially by those in power, showing how fragile international relations can be. It's important to consider how agreements are used in the real world.

Wars Within Wars: Deep State/Counter State, 4th Estate, AI & SPQR (Part One)

Dr. Pippa's Pen & Podcast • 37 implied HN points • 02 Dec 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy
  1. There was a possibility for peace in Ukraine, with leaders agreeing to negotiate, but actions by the US and UK changed that.
  2. The introduction of long-range weapons by the US and UK means they are now seen as direct targets by Russia, escalating the danger.
  3. Many experts agree this war is unwinnable for Ukraine, so continuing the fight raises serious concerns about a larger conflict, including nuclear risks.