Brad DeLong's Grasping Reality • 384 implied HN points • 27 Feb 26
- The Supreme Court is operating like a Trump‑era power machine, using textualist and originalist rhetoric to justify shadow‑docket emergency stays that let the executive act quickly and create facts on the ground.
- Justice Barrett often serves as the decisive swing vote and presents herself as a neutral originalist. In practice she frequently enables expansive presidential power in emergency decisions, letting policies take effect before courts resolve the merits.
- The justices divide into hardline authoritarians (Alito, Thomas), structural revolutionaries (Gorsuch), and technocratic enablers (Kavanaugh, Roberts) versus three principled liberal dissenters, and the net effect is weakened agencies, narrower protections for workers and marginalized groups, and outcomes that favor business and executive power.