The Honest Broker Newsletter • 3680 implied HN points • 17 Feb 26
- A recent EPA decision tries to reinterpret the Clean Air Act in a way that risks stepping into the judiciary’s role, which almost certainly invites lawsuits and constitutional conflict.
- Leaving water vapor out of the regulated greenhouse gases was the Endangerment Finding’s weakest point, because combustion-derived water vapor can measurably affect local and regional climate and therefore fits the logic used to regulate other gases.
- Including water vapor in regulation would be politically and practically chaotic and costly, so the real fix is for Congress to update the Clean Air Act or for litigation to force a clear judicial ruling.