The hottest Judicial Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics

An Impressive Start

The Reactionary • 80 implied HN points • 14 Feb 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Legislation Judicial Political parties
  1. The new administration is making quick changes with executive orders, showing a clear direction compared to the previous term. This includes cutting unnecessary spending in government programs.
  2. There is a significant effort to reduce the federal workforce, with plans to lay off many employees soon. This is part of a broader move to streamline government operations.
  3. Opposition to these changes is mainly coming from the courts, as the Democratic party is currently not posing a strong challenge. The Democrats may focus on litigation to counteract the new policies.

The courts aren’t coming to save us.

Today's Edition Newsletter • 7016 implied HN points • 10 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Election Impeachment Legislation Judicial Advocacy
  1. Efforts to hold Trump accountable through the courts are important, but defeating him at the ballot box is crucial.
  2. The DC Circuit judges were openly skeptical of Trump's claim of presidential immunity, leading to a bizarre court hearing.
  3. Speaker Mike Johnson is facing challenges within the GOP caucus, where some members are considering his removal.

Mifepristone and the rule of law, part II

Adam's Legal Newsletter • 2037 implied HN points • 10 Apr 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal FDA Judicial Abortion Safety
  1. The district court's decision to overturn the FDA's approval of mifepristone is based on a variety of reasons, such as standing, timeliness, exhaustion, and the merits of the FDA's actions.
  2. The court assessed issues like the criteria for standing, timeliness of the lawsuit, the exhaustion of legal claims, and the agency's compliance with regulations.
  3. In examining the merits, the court questioned the FDA's safety analysis, imposition of restrictions, political influences, and the reasoning behind decisions made over a span of decades.

Revenge of the Statesmen

Adam's Legal Newsletter • 539 implied HN points • 09 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Judicial Elections Constitution Federalism
  1. Marbury v. Madison case set a precedent where judicial decisions can have questionable rationales but still deliver impactful results
  2. In the Trump v. Anderson case, the Supreme Court aimed for practical solutions, left doors open for legislative action, and made decisions that balanced unanimity with legitimacy
  3. States should have the authority to apply federal law, including constitutional law, without needing explicit permission, as highlighted by the issues faced in the Trump v. Anderson case

Gloom & Doom with the Judge

John’s Substack • 5 implied HN points • 24 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Judicial Foreign affairs Government Elections Political Commentary
  1. The conversation emphasized the serious issues in the Middle East and Ukraine. It highlighted how these conflicts continue to affect global politics.
  2. There was a focus on what former President Trump might do regarding these conflicts in the future. This creates uncertainty about how U.S. foreign policy could change.
  3. Overall, the talk maintained a gloomy tone while trying to provide insights. The aim was to inform listeners about the current state of world affairs.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity: