The hottest Legal Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top Business Topics

Judicial Notice (10.27.24): Money Talks

Original Jurisdiction • 319 implied HN points • 28 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Judiciary Elections Legal Government Legislation
  1. Susman Godfrey won a huge $1.6 billion verdict for a client, which means they could earn a massive fee. This proves their strength in handling big cases.
  2. Kobre & Kim also had a big win, securing a $605 million jury verdict in a trade secrets case. This shows that some law firms are doing really well right now.
  3. There are talks about potential attorney general candidates for a future Trump administration, indicating shifts in political and legal roles ahead.

Avraham Eisenberg Sentenced to 52 Months in Prison for Child Porn Following Karlstack Investigation

Karlstack • 380 implied HN points • 03 Jun 25
📰 News Crime Legal Media Technology
  1. Avraham Eisenberg was sentenced to 52 months in prison for possessing child pornography. This followed an investigation that unveiled serious crimes connected to him.
  2. Before his arrest, Eisenberg exploited the Mango Markets crypto protocol, leading to significant financial gains. His actions had serious consequences in the crypto world.
  3. The investigation not only held Eisenberg accountable but also showed the risks that investigative journalists face when exposing wrongdoing.

No immunity for Trump

Robert Reich • 28735 implied HN points • 06 Feb 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Supreme Court Justice System
  1. A federal appeals court rejected Trump's claim of immunity for charges related to the 2020 election.
  2. Trump's legal delays may allow him to postpone a trial until after the presidential election.
  3. The court system should set tighter deadlines to prevent Trump from running out the clock on accountability.

One Voice

Steady • 27772 implied HN points • 06 Feb 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Trump Courts Presidency Judiciary
  1. A federal appeals court rejected Donald Trump's immunity claim for alleged crimes regarding the 2020 election.
  2. The court panel comprised of judges from both Democratic and Republican parties unanimously ruled against Trump.
  3. Trump has a tight deadline to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court as his legal strategies face challenges.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

Eithan Haim: ‘We Took On the Federal Leviathan and We Won’

Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 7410 implied HN points • 25 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Healthcare Civil Rights Government Politics
  1. Dr. Eithan Haim faced serious legal trouble after exposing a children's hospital for performing gender surgeries on minors. He believed it was important to stand up against this practice.
  2. After a hard-fought battle, the charges against him were dropped by the Trump administration, allowing him to move on with his life and celebrate with his family.
  3. Despite the financial and emotional toll, Haim and his wife feel proud of their actions and believe they made the world a better place for children.

Will Trump go to jail before his trial even begins?

Robert Reich • 30287 implied HN points • 07 Aug 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Trial Trump Court Justice
  1. Trump violated a key condition of his release pending trial by making statements that could be seen as attempts to influence jurors or intimidate witnesses.
  2. Prosecutors requested a protective order to stop Trump from sharing information about the upcoming trial after he made threatening posts on social media.
  3. The court must assert the rule of law and be prepared to take action, potentially including revoking Trump's release pending trial or putting him in jail, to ensure he is treated like any other criminal defendant.

A Legal Lightning Round (02.09.24)

The Status Kuo • 13561 implied HN points • 09 Feb 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Election Investigation Justice Courts
  1. The Supreme Court leaned towards keeping Trump on the Colorado ballot to avoid opening up a situation where states could disqualify candidates, potentially causing chaos.
  2. Special Counsel Ben Hur exonerated President Joe Biden of mishandling classified documents, but made politically charged comments in the report, drawing criticism.
  3. Judge Aileen Cannon in Florida is facing challenge for her rulings in the Mar-a-Lago classified documents case, with accusations of favoritism towards Trump and endangering witnesses.

Trump’s Immunity Defense Crumbles

The Status Kuo • 14662 implied HN points • 10 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Presidency Impeachment Supreme Court Criminal Justice
  1. The panel was skeptical of Trump's absolute immunity claim, even a Republican appointee was doubtful.
  2. Allowing presidential immunity from prosecution could lead to dangerous outcomes, like enabling the president to order assassinations.
  3. The Judgment Impeachment Clause argument is weak, as it does not provide absolute immunity from prosecution for a president.

Thomson Reuters wins early AI copyright case

The PhilaVerse • 123 implied HN points • 12 Feb 25
🕹 Technology AI Copyright Legal Innovation Intellectual Property
  1. Thomson Reuters won a significant court case against Ross Intelligence for copyright infringement. They claimed Ross used their legal content without permission for AI training.
  2. The judge ruled against Ross, stating that their use of the content competed with Thomson Reuters and damaged their market value. This decision sets a strong precedent for future AI copyright cases.
  3. Legal experts warn that this ruling could make it harder for AI companies to argue fair use when using copyrighted material. It highlights ongoing concerns about how AI interacts with existing copyright laws.

The Fourteenth Amendment Wasn’t a Creative Writing Exercise

Bulwark+ • 9552 implied HN points • 31 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Presidential National Security Authoritarianism Democracy
  1. The Fourteenth Amendment was drafted in response to specific concerns about real-world actions from the past.
  2. The Fourteenth Amendment's Section 3 was written to prevent individuals like John B. Floyd, who violated their oath of office, from holding government positions.
  3. The progression of authoritarianism in America reveals the fragility of our system's guardrails when confronted one by one.

The Authoritarian Playbook: 2025

Bulwark+ • 7488 implied HN points • 19 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Elections Leadership Policies Partisanship
  1. A report warns of destructive actions an authoritarian president could take in 2025, building on past behaviors.
  2. The report outlines potential actions, such as abusing pardons to incite violence and using federal power for political aims.
  3. The authors stress the importance of not underestimating the potential impact of a second term for Trump and the need for vigilance.

Ka-ching: $18.3 M + $65 M = $83.3 million verdict against Trump

Lucian Truscott Newsletter • 6368 implied HN points • 26 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Verdict Donald Trump Lawsuit
  1. Manhattan jury awarded $18.3 million in compensatory damages and $65 million in punitive damages against Trump in E. Jean Carroll defamation trial.
  2. Trump criticized the verdict, claiming his First Amendment rights were taken away, and stated he would appeal.
  3. New York Attorney General aims to penalize Trump $370 million in a separate case for lying on loan and insurance applications.

Bob Menendez, Al Franken, and the presumption of innocence

Popular Information • 11419 implied HN points • 25 Sep 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Ethics Corruption Scandal Government
  1. Bob Menendez is currently facing allegations of accepting bribes in exchange for official favors.
  2. Despite the presumption of innocence, Senate Democrats have called for Menendez to resign over the corruption allegations.
  3. In contrast, when faced with similar allegations, Senate Democrats swiftly called for the resignation of Al Franken.

Tucker and Ben Shapiro Pegged By Con Man Prostitute with Sham Story

Bulwark+ • 10141 implied HN points • 07 Sep 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Scandal Media Conspiracy Legal Fraud
  1. A convicted fraudster made uncorroborated claims about Barack Obama involving crack and gay activities.
  2. The accuser's background includes a lengthy arrest record and a history of lying, casting doubt on the credibility of the claims.
  3. The claims lack corroborating evidence or witnesses, failing a lie detector test, making them flimsy and unreliable.

EXCLUSIVE: A High Schooler Graduated with a 3.4 GPA. He Couldn’t Even Read.

Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 1711 implied HN points • 12 Feb 25
🚌 Education Policy Reform Legal Assessment Access
  1. A high school student graduated with a 3.4 GPA but couldn't read or spell his own name. This raises concerns about the education system's effectiveness.
  2. The student is suing his school district, claiming they didn't provide him with the education he needed, which is required by law.
  3. A federal appeals court agreed with the student, saying his lack of education caused him serious harm and that he was capable of learning to read.

Chalk one up for democracy and the rule of law

Lucian Truscott Newsletter • 4559 implied HN points • 06 Feb 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Court ruling Presidential immunity Constitution Impeachment
  1. The U.S. Court of Appeals rejected Trump's immunity claim from prosecution, upholding a previous ruling.
  2. The Court emphasized that former presidents are not above the law and can be prosecuted like any other citizen.
  3. The decision sets a powerful precedent by refuting Trump's legal claims and laying out the details of the charges against him.

A choice Republicans will regret.

Today's Edition Newsletter • 8549 implied HN points • 26 Oct 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Election Congress Legal Foreign Relations Scandal
  1. The House Republicans elected an extreme MAGA candidate, which may backfire for the GOP heading into the 2024 elections.
  2. A New York judge fined Trump $10,000 for violating a gag order, which may jeopardize his legal situation further.
  3. President Biden's stance on Israel may impact his support among certain voters, highlighting the challenge of balancing different interests as a leader.

Brute force in the service of religious nationalism

Today's Edition Newsletter • 9159 implied HN points • 01 Jul 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Discrimination Rights Justice Policy
  1. The Court's majority issued decisions in fake controversies, reducing the rule of law to brute force in the service of religious nationalism.
  2. The ruling in 303 Creative allows businesses to discriminate against LGBTQ people, causing harm and injustice.
  3. In another case, the Court overlooked jurisdiction issues to disadvantage Black Americans, particularly affecting Black women with student loan debt.

Trudeau regime puts Canadian detective on trial for investigating link between infant deaths and mRNA vaccines

The Dossier • 8372 implied HN points • 11 Oct 23
🌍 World Politics Investigation Vaccines Media Legal Trial
  1. A Canadian detective is on trial for investigating a potential link between infant deaths and mRNA vaccines.
  2. The detective faced misconduct charges for inquiring about COVID-19 vaccination status of deceased infants' parents.
  3. The detective's trial was complicated by a leaked investigation, wiretap controversy, and allegations of a cover-up.

Is the Electoral Fix Already In?

TK News by Matt Taibbi • 12088 implied HN points • 26 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Election Campaign Government Legal Democracy
  1. The 2024 presidential race might be influenced more by lawyers than voters as plans for potential lawfare tactics are being revealed.
  2. There have been past efforts and discussions about potential strategies that involve legal actions, lawsuits, and political maneuvering that may impact election outcomes.
  3. Both sides seem to be preparing for possible norm-breaking actions before the election, raising questions about the integrity and fairness of the democratic process.

If Salvador Dali painted a Supreme Court appeal

Lucian Truscott Newsletter • 3400 implied HN points • 20 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Constitution Supreme Court Presidency
  1. Trump's appeal to the Supreme Court regarding his ban from Colorado is seen as surreal because it interprets the 14th Amendment in a peculiar way.
  2. Legal scholars argue that the 14th Amendment should bar insurrectionists from office, without the need for them to hold office first.
  3. Trump's appeal presents a bizarre argument that attempts to sidestep the 14th Amendment's provisions regarding disqualifying insurrectionists.

Donald Trump's perfect world of unlimited power

Lucian Truscott Newsletter • 3498 implied HN points • 11 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Presidency Impeachment Power Constitution
  1. Donald Trump's legal team argued for immunity from prosecution for his actions as president unless impeached.
  2. Recent court rulings have rejected Trump's claims of immunity from civil lawsuits.
  3. Trump's plans if re-elected include extreme actions like replacing civil service workers and invoking the Insurrection Act.

The Latest Filing In Kari Lake v. Katie Hobbs in Arizona

Emerald Robinson’s The Right Way • 4285 implied HN points • 21 Nov 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Election Legal Media
  1. Maricopa County did not properly certify the voting machines, which is a serious issue.
  2. The county failed to conduct required testing on vote-center tabulators, raising questions about the election's integrity.
  3. Arizona's Supreme Court may need to address the potential criminal fraud and consider decertifying the election.

The MAGA Carta

Diane Francis • 979 implied HN points • 09 May 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Constitution Legal Government Judiciary Elections
  1. The Magna Carta was the first document to say that the king isn't above the law. This idea is important for keeping leaders in check.
  2. The U.S. Constitution builds on this idea by creating guidelines for how power should be shared and controlled among the government.
  3. There is concern about a Supreme Court case that could give a president legal immunity while in office, which goes against the principle that no one is above the law.

Josh Dehaas: You owe Jason Kenney a beer

The Line • 2083 implied HN points • 26 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Civil Liberties Constitutional Rights
  1. Jason Kenney's fight for provincial jurisdiction was crucial in the legal case against the invocation of the Emergencies Act.
  2. Kenney's decision to stand up for Alberta's capacity and authority in handling the situation was validated by the court.
  3. The Federal Court's decision on the Emergencies Act could have lasting implications for protecting civil liberties.