The hottest Middle East Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top World Politics Topics
All-Source Intelligence Fusion • 1566 implied HN points • 20 Jan 26
  1. Google suspended the verified ad account tied to Desi Banks Productions LLC and removed the Mossad recruitment ads for violating its advertising policies.
  2. The ads were part of an international campaign linked to the 'Blue Message' network that used deceptive bait-and-switch tactics and targeted family members of Iranian officials, LGBTQ Iranians, and people across multiple countries to recruit Mossad assets.
  3. Desi Banks denied knowledge of the ads while independent investigations showed the campaign operated across Telegram, X, and Google Forms and used AI-generated and misleading content.
Astral Codex Ten • 6332 implied HN points • 18 Nov 25
  1. It’s important to have an opinion about the war in Gaza, as it affects many people and their lives. Engaging with this topic helps us understand the broader implications and human experiences involved.
  2. Different perspectives on the conflict exist, and it's crucial to listen to various viewpoints. This can help us form a more balanced and informed opinion.
  3. Expressing our thoughts on such a complex issue can be challenging, but it encourages dialogue and understanding. It’s okay to seek clarity and ask questions as we navigate this situation.
Phillips’s Newsletter • 372 implied HN points • 28 Feb 26
  1. The US and Israel have concentrated a huge amount of air and sea strike power around Iran — carriers, destroyers, submarines, and stealth aircraft — making one of the largest strike forces in decades.
  2. The publicly stated goal is regime change in Iran rather than a negotiated nuclear deal, with leaders framing limited military action as a way to overthrow the Iranian government.
  3. Key unknowns are how they will achieve regime change: can they locate and decapitate Iran’s leadership, have they secured inside collaborators, and will the Iranian people or military rise up — watch for leadership hits, defections, or mass protests.
Fisted by Foucault • 174 implied HN points • 05 Mar 26
  1. Iran is unusually vulnerable right now—internal protests, recent strikes, and waning support from Russia and China make it a tempting moment to try to decisively weaken or topple the regime.
  2. Removing or altering Iran’s government would eliminate the region’s main state challenger to U.S. influence and could significantly blunt Iran-backed groups like Hezbollah and the Houthis.
  3. U.S. strategy in the Middle East has long focused on securing oil supplies, using energy as geopolitical leverage, and protecting Israel, and ousting Iran would be seen as completing that long-running project.
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2570 implied HN points • 03 Jan 26
  1. Israel and its supporters deliberately stoke fear of “radical Islam” to divert criticism and boost support in Western countries.
  2. This strategy increases racism and social division, drowning out legitimate criticism by shifting attention and hatred onto Muslims.
  3. Instead of changing course, Israel leans on propaganda, censorship, and threats of violence to maintain support, implying its current form depends on ongoing abuse.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
The Chris Hedges Report • 511 implied HN points • 16 Feb 26
  1. Francesca Albanese, the UN special rapporteur on the occupied Palestinian territories, has been hit by a coordinated campaign from the U.S., Israel and several European governments that includes public attacks, sanctions and measures that block her travel and access to banking.
  2. Those attacks use misleading clips and political pressure to silence criticism of Israel’s actions in Gaza and the West Bank, even as many governments continue supplying arms and contributing to a worsening humanitarian crisis.
  3. The trend reflects a worrying erosion of international law and free speech, where powerful states can punish critics and shield abuses, risking greater impunity and repression worldwide.
God's Spies by Thomas Neuburger • 65 implied HN points • 17 Mar 26
  1. Though publicly boasting of military success, the administration quietly asked Iran for talks, with special envoy Steve Witkoff sending messages to Tehran.
  2. Iranian officials say they ignored those outreach efforts and that only the Supreme Leader can authorize negotiations, effectively closing the door to direct talks.
  3. The contrast between loud public rhetoric and private pleas highlights mixed signals and suggests the conflict may continue until one side falters, raising doubts about the coherence of the strategy.
God's Spies by Thomas Neuburger • 120 implied HN points • 13 Mar 26
  1. Iran fields large numbers of well-equipped missiles and drones with effective countermeasures and real‑time targeting that make them much harder to stop than many expect.
  2. Israel’s air defenses are being worn down and risk being overwhelmed as interceptors and systems are depleted by sustained, sophisticated attacks.
  3. Many U.S. missile defense programs can be defeated by common countermeasures, calling into question the effectiveness of expensive systems and suggesting major procurement and technical problems.
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 1932 implied HN points • 11 Jan 26
  1. US and allied actions like crushing sanctions and covert meddling have been used to weaken Iran by hurting ordinary people, which fuels unrest and can function as engineered pressure for regime change.
  2. Backing regime change in Iran effectively helps the US-centered imperial project, so opposing state violence while cheering for regime change is inconsistent and ultimately strengthens a more powerful, abusive actor.
  3. What’s needed is to weaken that western imperial power rather than topple its enemies into the empire’s hands, because real freedom depends on dismantling centralized global domination, not expanding it.
Stark Realities with Brian McGlinchey • 714 implied HN points • 02 Feb 26
  1. The Israeli military has acknowledged about 70,000 deaths in Gaza, roughly matching the Gaza Health Ministry's count. That figure does not include bodies still under rubble or people who died from disease or malnutrition.
  2. Israel and many of its political and media supporters spent years publicly discrediting the Gaza Health Ministry’s fatality numbers, a campaign that influenced U.S. officials and even congressional and Pentagon restrictions on citing the figures.
  3. Multiple independent organizations, visiting medical witnesses, and leaked Israeli data point to a very high civilian death rate and tactics—heavy bombing, large bombs in dense areas, and shootings at civilians—that raise serious war‑crime concerns likely to be further scrutinized if Gaza is opened fully to journalists.
Taipology • 63 implied HN points • 03 Mar 26
  1. Bombing alone is unlikely to topple Iran — its vast terrain, large population, and decentralized "mosaic" defenses make regime change by air strikes (or a quick ground invasion) implausible.
  2. Some diaspora communities are openly celebrating heavy strikes and spreading misleading or exaggerated claims online, turning a complex war into polarizing memes and wishful thinking.
  3. The conflict looks set to be long, costly, and destabilizing: rising casualties, mass public grief that can create martyrs, and hard choices for allies about whether to stay engaged or cut losses.
eugyppius: a plague chronicle • 281 implied HN points • 01 Mar 26
  1. A US-Israel strike reportedly killed Iran's Supreme Leader and several top commanders, and Iran has retaliated with ballistic missile and drone strikes against Israel, US bases, and allied Gulf states.
  2. Ursula von der Leyen says the European Commission will begin intensive monitoring after the weekend and has been calling Gulf and regional leaders, but the Commission has limited concrete geopolitical influence so those actions are largely symbolic.
  3. There is sharp criticism that EU leaders comment too much on global crises despite limited power, and that they should refrain from making performative statements.
Anima Mundi • 267 implied HN points • 22 Feb 26
  1. The old postwar security architecture is fraying: the New START treaty lapsed and American guarantees to Europe are being redefined, pushing Europe to rearm and raising nuclear and military risks.
  2. Several crises are converging — a possible US strike on Iran, the ongoing war in Ukraine, and China’s strategic positioning — which together increase global instability and encourage arms races and opportunistic aggression.
  3. Trust in institutions and assumptions is weakening — courts, executive rules, trade policy, and techno-optimism around AI are being treated as malleable, ending a ‘deferred’ way of managing security and the future and forcing hard choices about who pays and what gets sacrificed.
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2835 implied HN points • 21 Dec 25
  1. Israel is pushing Western governments and institutions to crack down on pro‑Palestine speech and protests, influencing laws and arrests that restrict civil liberties.
  2. When a foreign state works to erode civil liberties at home, citizens are justified in fighting back by targeting that state's influence and interests in their own countries.
  3. People should openly and unapologetically work to weaken support for Israel — exposing propaganda, making ties to its lobby politically costly, and campaigning to reduce its standing.
All-Source Intelligence Fusion • 1119 implied HN points • 24 Jan 26
  1. Court filings show a large, years‑long set of U.S. government‑backed covert information‑collection and influence programs aimed at Iran, with many program codenames dated from 2012 to 2020.
  2. Private contractors and shell companies — including U.S. and British firms and firms later bought or rebranded — carried out and supported these operations, and lawsuits and leaked documents exposed encrypted chats, program names, and payment disputes.
  3. The filings also reveal a global campaign of similar programs targeting many countries, using techniques like Wi‑Fi mapping, human and signals intelligence, market research, and influence activities often coordinated with U.S. agencies.
Seymour Hersh • 28 implied HN points • 19 Mar 26
  1. Fear of a nuclear Iran — even if exaggerated — was presented as the main justification for the recent war and the resulting slaughter.
  2. Senior U.S. military figures engaged in highly secret contacts with Iran’s military leadership, including indirect dealings with the supreme leader, showing intense behind-the-scenes engagement before open conflict.
  3. A pointed joke about the supreme leader captures how officials saw him as inscrutable and suggests that dark humor and misperception played into serious decision-making.
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2314 implied HN points • 28 Dec 25
  1. The Israeli prime minister has been meeting President Trump unusually often this year. Their talks reportedly include planning more attacks on Iran, suggesting close US–Israel coordination toward military action.
  2. Western governments and authorities are cracking down hard on pro-Palestine speech and protests, using arrests and new laws to limit demonstrations. High-profile arrests and recent protest bans show free speech is being curtailed in places like the UK and Australia.
  3. Israel’s recognition of Somaliland and reported talks about resettling Gazans have sparked fears of forced deportation and ethnic cleansing. Serious allegations of abuse by Israeli forces and the widening use of US military strikes abroad add to growing international controversy.
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 1620 implied HN points • 12 Jan 26
  1. The United States is aggressively reasserting imperial control in Latin America and the Middle East, pressuring countries like Cuba and Venezuela and carrying out military and regime-change actions.
  2. Political promises to fight the deep state have given way to advancing neocon and intelligence-agency agendas, creating chaos that helps authoritarian politics at home.
  3. There is stark media and policy bias: Palestinian civilian deaths are downplayed while calls for regime change (e.g., Iran) would expand US imperial power, so opposing intervention and defending the right to criticize Israel are framed as both moral and civil-rights imperatives.
God's Spies by Thomas Neuburger • 160 implied HN points • 08 Mar 26
  1. Commercial satellite firms are delaying public images over Israel and the Gulf, so independent observers lack real-time visual evidence of damage there while images of Iran remain available.
  2. Other reports claim heavy damage to U.S. bases and Israeli infrastructure, meaning repairs could take years and may weaken future U.S. presence in the region.
  3. Iran looks determined to keep fighting and seems unlikely to fold, and because Israel is small even a low rate of successful strikes can cause outsized damage while Iran’s size gives it greater staying power.
Taipology • 74 implied HN points • 01 Mar 26
  1. Missile interceptors are expensive and often miss, so the US is burning through costly stockpiles that are hard to replenish because key parts like semiconductors and rare earths mostly come from China.
  2. Iran’s missile forces are mostly mobile and spread out, which encourages a 'use it or lose it' response and means strikes are hitting regional targets while fueling widespread Shia anger after the Ayatollah’s killing.
  3. That dynamic leaves the US with few good options: either pull back without achieving regime change or stay and risk a costly quagmire, while a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz could push oil prices much higher and make the situation worse.
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 3450 implied HN points • 04 Dec 25
  1. Multiple reports and survivor testimonies allege that prison guards trained dogs to sexually assault Palestinian detainees, and these accounts have been circulated by various organizations and journalists.
  2. The alleged practice is widely condemned as deeply evil and morally unacceptable, described as one of the worst kinds of torture.
  3. There is concern that criticizing these alleged atrocities is sometimes labeled antisemitic, sparking debate about where legitimate criticism of state actions ends and prejudice begins.
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2021 implied HN points • 01 Jan 26
  1. Israel has banned dozens of aid organizations from operating in Gaza, including Doctors Without Borders and Oxfam, which looks like an effort to remove witnesses and limit independent reporting much like its ban on journalists.
  2. Humanitarian groups, especially MSF, publicly documented systematic attacks on hospitals, destruction of medical equipment, and deliberate deprivation of essentials, with some reports characterizing the actions as tantamount to genocide.
  3. Pro‑Israel lobbyists and political leaders are pushing to silence criticism in Western democracies, and allied governments — notably the U.S. under Trump in 2025 — have shown hypocrisy by expanding military actions while claiming pro‑free‑speech and anti‑war stances.
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2370 implied HN points • 23 Dec 25
  1. People who criticize Israel are often dismissed as simply being antisemitic instead of being allowed to complain about alleged human rights abuses, lobbying, and suppression of dissent.
  2. Tragic events are portrayed as being used to wipe away prior criticisms and to justify harsher policies, effectively silencing opposition and reshaping the public conversation.
  3. The piece argues there’s an outsized, obsessive focus on one small state while ignoring wider historical and geopolitical factors, including Western imperial backing and powerful influence operations that shape other countries’ politics and media.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 1182 implied HN points • 19 Jan 26
  1. The film Palestine 36 is internationally backed and has gained awards attention, but it presents a politically shaped version of the past.
  2. It omits key historical facts—especially Jewish immigration and presence in 1936—resulting in a distorted, incomplete account of the period.
  3. Renewed public interest in the conflict’s origins has produced both rigorous histories and dramatized films, and this movie favors political storytelling over historical accuracy.
Unreported Truths • 40 implied HN points • 18 Mar 26
  1. Israel and the U.S. are carrying out a deliberate campaign to kill or decapitate Iran’s military and intelligence leadership using signals intelligence, spying, airpower, and precision strikes.
  2. This is a new, radical kind of warfare — aimed at disabling a country’s command structure from the top while trying to avoid mass civilian casualties, an approach enabled by modern technology.
  3. Whether it will work is unclear: success depends on stopping Iran from plugging leaks and on whether its leaders will keep risking death rather than surrendering, and Iran can still wield leverage through things like closing the Strait of Hormuz.
Taipology • 74 implied HN points • 28 Feb 26
  1. The US, with Israel playing a leading role, appears to be pursuing a long-planned regime-change campaign against Iran that may rely on regional proxies rather than large numbers of American ground troops.
  2. Iran has struck back effectively with missiles, making the fight likely to be prolonged and costly; putting Tehran on "death ground" guarantees fierce resistance and raises the risk of a quagmire for the US.
  3. The strategic benefits for the United States are unclear, and the conflict may actually help China geopolitically because China’s oil supply is diversified and it can leverage other economic levers rather than being contained by a war in the Middle East.
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2514 implied HN points • 15 Dec 25
  1. Killing civilians is clearly wrong — whether it happened at Bondi Beach or in Gaza.
  2. Many supporters of Israel are using the Bondi attack to blame peaceful pro‑Palestine protesters and push for limits on speech, instead of blaming the actual shooters or the policies that radicalize people.
  3. Opposing Israel’s violent actions and calling out potential genocide is not the same as endorsing terrorism, and there’s a real danger that this attack will be used to further suppress protests and free expression in Australia.
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 1909 implied HN points • 28 Dec 25
  1. People who back the establishment often pretend they’re worried about protest chants or methods as a way to shut down pro-Palestine protests.
  2. This is a common tactic: critics will attack the way people protest rather than the issues those protests raise, which keeps the status quo intact.
  3. Across countries and institutions, arrests, laws, and censorship are being framed as safety concerns but actually make it harder to criticize Israel; watch their actions, not their words.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 268 implied HN points • 22 Feb 26
  1. Iran’s security forces carried out a brutal, deadly crackdown on widespread protests. This repression occurred alongside a deliberate effort to crush dissent on the ground.
  2. The government seeded social media and state outlets with a narrative that the protests were the work of foreign intelligence like the CIA and Mossad. That messaging was used to justify the crackdown and paint protesters as foreign agents.
  3. The information campaign wasn’t just for domestic audiences but aimed at international allies and global conversations to whitewash the killings and shape foreign opinion. The regime pushed propaganda abroad to deflect blame and discredit dissidents.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 2466 implied HN points • 14 Dec 25
  1. Even in the darkest circumstances people held on to tradition, lighting a menorah with whatever they had to show resilience and a clear sense of identity.
  2. Seeing newly released footage of a lost loved one alive again for a moment is a deeply painful and surreal experience that underscores the human cost of violence.
  3. Recent attacks and long-known patterns of persecution show that antisemitic violence remains a persistent global threat that demands attention.
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2347 implied HN points • 17 Dec 25
  1. A wide range of pro-Israel outlets and public figures quickly pushed the same message tying the Bondi Beach shooting to the slogan "globalize the intifada," creating the appearance of a coordinated talking point.
  2. Equating that slogan with calls for massacring Jews conflates protest and criticism of Israel with violent antisemitism, while ignoring that "intifada" can include nonviolent resistance.
  3. Using the attack to spotlight this slogan looks like a political move to deflect attention from Israel’s actions in Gaza and to discourage criticism by framing dissent as dangerous.
Aaron Mate • 196 implied HN points • 02 Mar 26
  1. The US and Israel launched "Operation Epic Fury" to pursue regime change in Iran, carrying out assassinations and bombings that caused heavy civilian casualties and quickly widened the fighting across the region.
  2. What looked like diplomacy was largely a cover, as US negotiators pretended to seek a deal while preparing military strikes and undermining a possible agreement.
  3. The official reasons for war — that Iran was on the brink of a nuclear weapon or an imminent missile threat — were exaggerated or false, suggesting the action is ideologically driven and risks a catastrophic, open-ended conflict.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 153 implied HN points • 01 Mar 26
  1. Previous rounds of tit‑for‑tat strikes were carefully choreographed to avoid killing Americans, often causing little damage or no casualties.
  2. After U.S. and Israeli strikes that killed Iran’s supreme leader and other senior figures, Iran launched wide retaliatory attacks using ballistic missiles and drones across the region.
  3. Unlike earlier exchanges, the regime now appears to be risking a major escalation and is effectively betting on causing American casualties to press its advantage.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 565 implied HN points • 06 Feb 26
  1. Trump publicly warned Iran the U.S. was "locked and loaded" if the regime shot protesters, but no U.S. strike followed the subsequent deadly crackdown.
  2. Officials say a key practical reason for not striking is that U.S. missile defense and strike resources are depleted, which limits options for rapid retaliation.
  3. Instead of punishing the regime for the massacre, U.S. envoys are meeting with Iranian officials to negotiate about the nuclear program and support for terrorism rather than the protesters' fate.
God's Spies by Thomas Neuburger • 145 implied HN points • 06 Mar 26
  1. Bahrain is ruled by the Sunni Al Khalifa family that seized control in the 18th century and has stayed in power with the political and military backing of Britain and the United States.
  2. The government practices sectarian policies that marginalize the indigenous Shia majority—blocking access to housing, jobs, and citizenship—and deliberately naturalizes foreign Sunnis to change the demographics and staff loyal security forces.
  3. Deep corruption and inequality fuel unrest: migrant workers face abuse, Western expats often get better treatment, and protests are met with arrests, torture, and other harsh repression.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 1061 implied HN points • 16 Jan 26
  1. Widespread nationwide protests have been met with brutal repression — shootings, mass arrests, and internet shutdowns — and the real death toll is likely much higher than official counts.
  2. The Islamic Republic survives less by popularity than by a vast, overlapping security apparatus (IRGC, intelligence services, Basij, police) and an ideological framework designed to crush domestic dissent.
  3. Because the regime is willing to use extreme violence and has been built to endure internal warfare, it is more durable and less likely to be quickly overthrown than many outsiders assume.
The Chris Hedges Report • 178 implied HN points • 24 Feb 26
  1. A U.S. attack on Iran would be a catastrophic mistake driven by incompetent leadership and could spark a wider, prolonged regional war.
  2. Demanding that Iran dismantle its nuclear and missile programs in exchange for no new sanctions is unrealistic and won’t convince Tehran to disarm.
  3. Iran’s size, alliances, and ability to close the Strait of Hormuz and strike regional targets mean such a war would cause heavy casualties, soaring oil prices, and major global economic damage.
Phillips’s Newsletter • 143 implied HN points • 05 Mar 26
  1. Airpower strategy is basically about targeting — by seeing what a state attacks you can infer its strategic aims.
  2. Airpower expands the battlefield across air, sea and space, letting strikes reach far from front lines and cause wide-ranging effects.
  3. Iran seems to emphasize indirect, diversionary air attacks (like drones and long-range strikes) to force opponents to waste resources on defense and repairs rather than only destroying specific targets.
Phillips’s Newsletter • 160 implied HN points • 03 Mar 26
  1. Modern air operations have revealed both the strengths and the limits of air power, showing where strikes can be decisive and where they fall short.
  2. Iran is actively fighting back with its own air campaign, which complicates the battlespace and changes how attacks and defenses play out.
  3. Political leaders have offered shifting and sometimes contradictory justifications for the war, leaving the strategic purpose unclear and suggesting mixed or domestic motives.
Comment is Freed • 140 implied HN points • 28 Feb 26
  1. The US and Israel have launched strikes with the stated goal of regime change, and Iran now sees its survival as threatened so it has struck back across the region.
  2. Iran’s government is internally weak — corrupt, economically strained, and it recently crushed large protests — but it still relies on well-organized, ruthless forces like the revolutionary guard.
  3. Those dynamics raise the risk of a wider regional war as Iran tries to create chaos to raise the political stakes for the US, yet it remains unclear whether the strikes will actually topple the regime.