A Natural Language

A Natural Language critically examines mainstream climate change narratives, focusing on perceived inaccuracies in carbon accounting, the role of land stewardship, and the potential consequences of green policies. It advocates for holistic environmental management and challenges current climate solutions, promoting a shift towards sustainable practices and transparency in environmental claims.

Climate Change Skepticism Environmental Policy Critique Legal Strategies in Environmental Advocacy Sustainability and Regenerative Practices Carbon Accounting and Emissions Land Stewardship and Desertification Opposition to Green Imperialism Criticisms of Scientific Consensus on Climate Alternative Approaches to Environmentalism

The hottest Substack posts of A Natural Language

And their main takeaways
0 implied HN points β€’ 17 Sep 23
  1. The legal campaign aims to highlight carbon accounting fraud in court cases to derail misguided climate policies.
  2. Consider reaching out to relevant parties in climate-related court cases to support the campaign.
  3. Another strategy is to send cease and desist letters to key protagonists to create liability for misleading environmental claims.
0 implied HN points β€’ 26 May 23
  1. The big lie climate propagandists push is the carbon accounting framework, which targets specific emissions sources and ignores larger contributors like deforestation.
  2. Forest clear-cutting emits significant carbon dioxide plumes that are often overlooked in carbon accounting, impacting the rise in atmospheric carbon.
  3. Challenging the carbon accounting framework challenges the very foundation of climate propaganda, revealing the flaws in current climate narratives and highlighting the need for accountability.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
0 implied HN points β€’ 08 Mar 23
  1. Better land stewardship can help soak up atmospheric carbon dioxide quickly.
  2. Soil with less carbon holds less water, leading to more topsoil loss and water evaporation.
  3. Desertification fueled by man-made activities like plantations and overgrazing can be reversed by techniques like harvesting water and limiting soil evaporation.
0 implied HN points β€’ 07 Mar 23
  1. Carbon emissions from soil are significant and often overlooked compared to other sources like oil.
  2. Forestry emissions research indicates that cleared forests release significant carbon emissions into the atmosphere.
  3. The focus should not just be on how much carbon soil can sequester, but also on preventing the loss of soil carbon.
0 implied HN points β€’ 05 Mar 23
  1. Topsoil loss contributes significant carbon emissions.
  2. Promoting gardening and regenerative farming can help mitigate climate change.
  3. Leaving plants around when clearing fields can help offset soil emissions.
0 implied HN points β€’ 14 Mar 23
  1. Defanging the climate narrative in court makes sense by exposing the corruption and environmental malfeasance fueling it.
  2. It is important to reach out to different types of lawsuits defending against environmental actions, land seizures, and liberty restrictions.
  3. Cease and desist letters can be sent to enablers, confronting green investment funds about misleading claims, and advocating for soil-friendly farming practices.
0 implied HN points β€’ 13 Mar 23
  1. Power and authority come from promises and obligations created by those promises.
  2. Coercion and control arise from access to resources, governing laws, and currencies in contractual promises.
  3. Building a gift-based economy on reciprocal promises can help dismantle oppression and coercion.
0 implied HN points β€’ 11 Mar 23
  1. There is little data to support tracking or curbing carbon emissions tied to consumption or industrialized activities.
  2. Blindly phasing out fossil fuels could lead to economic dislocation and food shortages.
  3. Green tech, conservancies, and mining are interconnected and can perpetuate imperialism through different means.
0 implied HN points β€’ 10 Mar 23
  1. Natural phenomena like desertification can often be explained by factors such as land stewardship and natural variability rather than solely climate change.
  2. Environmental crises like extinction and overfishing may be more effectively managed by focusing on creating toxin-free habitats and sustainable growing systems.
  3. Human activities like poor water management and forest practices significantly contribute to natural disasters like floods and wildfires.
0 implied HN points β€’ 08 Mar 23
  1. Topsoil carbon is a major contributor to the rise in atmospheric carbon dioxide.
  2. Fossil fuels directly contribute 12% of atmospheric carbon dioxide, despite a drop in use during economic lockdowns.
  3. Capturing waste output from smokestacks and using it for plant growth can help mitigate carbon emissions.
0 implied HN points β€’ 06 Mar 23
  1. Carbon accounting mirrors financial statements with emission sources like expenses and carbon stocks like balance sheet entries.
  2. Large landowners and fossil fuel giants benefit from carbon income sources, while carbon stocks often go unnoticed.
  3. There are flaws in carbon stock models that allow for biomass energy producers to claim burning wood pellets is a low carbon energy source.