The hottest Free speech Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics
I Might Be Wrong 7 implied HN points 22 Jan 25
  1. TikTok is under scrutiny for its data collection practices, raising concerns about privacy and security. It's important to understand what information TikTok gathers from its users.
  2. There is a big debate about whether social media companies should be seen as publishers or platforms. This classification affects potential regulations and legal responsibilities.
  3. The situation with TikTok highlights issues related to government control and influence over social media. It's a complicated topic that mixes technology, privacy, and politics.
GOOD INTERNET 20 implied HN points 11 Jan 24
  1. Substack is taking steps to remove Nazi content from the platform
  2. The fight against Nazism requires active moderation and suppression of hateful ideologies
  3. Deplatforming can be effective in reducing attention towards harmful influencers
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
Critical Mass 2 implied HN points 06 Aug 25
  1. The discussion revolves around the conflicts facing science and academia today. Many believe that ideological biases are affecting how science is conducted and taught.
  2. Interviews with key figures will share their perspectives on issues like free speech, cancel culture, and the detrimental effects of social justice activism in academic settings.
  3. There is a call to action for the academic community and the public to engage in conversations that promote sound science and restore trust and excellence in research.
Critical Mass 2 implied HN points 27 Jul 25
  1. A series of 20 interviews with authors from 'The War on Science' will be released, starting on July 22nd. Each interview focuses on different issues affecting science today.
  2. The authors discuss serious problems like the corruption of academia, free speech issues, and how social justice activism can interfere with genuine research.
  3. These conversations aim to spark important discussions about restoring trust and quality in science and scholarship at universities.
Critical Mass 2 implied HN points 24 Jul 25
  1. There will be 20 interviews released daily with authors from the book 'The War on Science', discussing important issues in academia. Each interview will cover topics like the corruption of science and free speech.
  2. The discussions will highlight how current social justice movements and ideologies are affecting scientific progress. They will also call for a return to sound science and scholarship in universities.
  3. The overall goal is to provoke conversation about restoring trust and excellence in scientific inquiry, addressing both internal university issues and external threats to science.
Who is Robert Malone 16 implied HN points 10 Feb 24
  1. The State Department is accused of censoring and limiting the circulation of disfavored press outlets, violating the First Amendment of the US Constitution.
  2. The lawsuit filed by media organizations like The Daily Wire and The Federalist alleges that the State Department is funding censorship technology to suppress certain American news outlets.
  3. The plaintiffs filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction to stop the Department of State from supporting technology that targets Americans' speech or press.
Silent Lunch, The David Zweig Newsletter 15 implied HN points 18 Feb 24
  1. Dave is pausing the Silent Lunch newsletter to focus on finishing his book and external research work.
  2. During the pause, paid subscribers will not lose any money, with payments suspended for monthly subscribers and subscriptions extended for annual subscribers.
  3. Dave assures readers that once the newsletter resumes, they can expect more content they love, including investigative pieces like those mentioned in the post.
steigan.no 7 implied HN points 06 Oct 24
  1. A news organization called Faktisk is asking for 100 million NOK each year to fight misinformation, but they can't show proof of how big the misinformation problem actually is in Norway.
  2. Hillary Clinton emphasized the need to control social media, suggesting that without regulation, society risks losing control, especially concerning harmful content.
  3. The war in Ukraine is evolving into a tough battle, with many acknowledging that realistic outcomes are unlikely to favor Ukraine, prompting many younger Ukrainians to rethink their commitment to military service.
Cosy Moments 13 implied HN points 21 Feb 24
  1. Debates about free speech need to evolve beyond slogans and articulate why free speech is important.
  2. John Milton and John Stuart Mill defended free speech, but their beliefs may not align perfectly with the reality of modern public discourse.
  3. The 'marketplace of ideas' concept may not always lead to truth or weed out false ideas given the complexities of human nature and manipulation in public debates.
The Corbett Report 22 implied HN points 20 Mar 23
  1. Conspiracy theorists are being pathologized by mainstream media and labeled as mentally ill.
  2. Historical examples show how conspiracy theorists have been targeted and portrayed as delusional by both media and authorities.
  3. Cases like Swinney and Binder demonstrate how conspiracy theorists are at risk of being forcibly detained in psychiatric facilities for their beliefs, especially in the era of COVID-19.
bad cattitude 10 implied HN points 19 Mar 24
  1. Ensuring freedom of speech is crucial in the modern public square - without it, we risk losing our rights and becoming subject to censorship by the government or other entities.
  2. The First Amendment is designed to protect people from the government and any attempt to suppress speech by those in power should be questioned and challenged.
  3. Censorship inhibits meaningful discourse and the search for truth - the remedy for wrong speech is more speech, not silencing differing opinions.
Natural Selections 4 implied HN points 10 Dec 24
  1. Universities should adopt the Chicago Principles, which support free speech and allow everyone to express themselves without fear of backlash. This helps create a safer space for open discussion.
  2. Administrators and faculty should encourage respectful disagreement and avoid ruling with fear. They should treat students as partners in learning, allowing for mistakes and corrections.
  3. Students should embrace diverse ideas and experiences, rather than seek comfort in familiar beliefs. Engaging with different perspectives helps broaden understanding and growth.
Critical Mass 1 implied HN point 14 Aug 25
  1. There will be 20 interviews released daily with authors from the book 'The War on Science,' starting from July 22. Each interview will cover various topics related to science and academia.
  2. The discussions will address issues like how ideology is affecting science, free speech in universities, and the challenges that current academic trends pose to genuine scholarship.
  3. The aim is to provoke a conversation about restoring trust and sound science in academia, emphasizing the importance of free inquiry and the negative effects of cancel culture and distortions in science.
Critical Mass 1 implied HN point 09 Aug 25
  1. There are 20 interviews being released with authors from the book 'The War on Science' starting on July 22. Each interview focuses on different issues in science and academia.
  2. The discussions cover serious topics like free speech in universities and ideological biases affecting scientific research and education.
  3. The goal is to spark conversation about restoring trust and integrity in science while addressing the internal challenges in academia today.
Critical Mass 1 implied HN point 31 Jul 25
  1. A series of interviews with authors from The War on Science will be released, highlighting important discussions about science and scholarship today. Each interview will cover different topics related to challenges in academia and the impact of social issues.
  2. The authors address issues like the influence of ideology on science, free speech limitations in universities, and the effects of cancel culture on research. These discussions are meant to spark conversations about how to improve scientific integrity.
  3. While there are new external threats to science, the internal problems in academia need attention. The goal is to restore trust in science and protect the principles of free inquiry and merit-based scholarship.
The Cosmopolitan Globalist 15 implied HN points 11 Apr 23
  1. Elon Musk's actions on Twitter have led to significant backlash and calls for him to step down.
  2. There is a dependency on Twitter for promotion and engagement within certain industries, like journalism
  3. Users are considering a #TwitterStrike as a way to address the issues with Elon Musk's influence on the platform.
The Missing Data Depot 10 implied HN points 14 Mar 23
  1. DEI bureaucracies often hinder free speech on college campuses, particularly for conservative viewpoints.
  2. Lack of empirical evidence makes it hard to determine the true impact of DEI programs on university speech climates.
  3. DEI bureaucracies may increase tolerance for progressive speakers while causing discomfort and disrupting conversations on campus.
Outspoken with Dr Naomi Wolf 6 implied HN points 09 May 23
  1. UK media regulator Ofcom censured Mark Steyn for sharing information from Pfizer documents about harm to women and babies.
  2. Ofcom found GB News in breach of broadcasting rules for not adequately challenging harmful claims made on air.
  3. Ofcom received over 26,000 complaints about COVID-related content and has opened several investigations into breaches.
Steve Kirsch's newsletter 3 implied HN points 18 Mar 24
  1. The US Supreme Court will hear a critical free speech case regarding government pressure on social media companies to censor content.
  2. There will be a live rally in front of the Supreme Court to advocate for free speech.
  3. The event will be covered by news outlets like The Highwire and The Epoch Times, and you can listen to the Supreme Court arguments live online.
Numb at the Lodge 2 HN points 28 Apr 23
  1. Heavenbanning creates a virtual online world for individuals where they feel appreciated and praised.
  2. Freedom of speech is more than just the ability to say anything; it's about the right to be heard and have your message distributed.
  3. Communication and language impose limits on free speech, as expressing oneself requires adhering to a structured system.
The Oyster Club 0 implied HN points 07 Jul 23
  1. The article discusses the UCLA controversy, highlighting issues with ideological rigidity, the importance of nuance, and the chilling effect of campus authoritarianism.
  2. The piece on AI hype and doomerism delves into the extremes of utopianism and apocalypticism, suggesting that AI is just another tool, not the end of now.
  3. The analysis of Twitter and context collapse explains how misunderstandings, in-jokes, and differing contexts can lead to conflicts, bias, and assumptions on social media.
The Oyster Club 0 implied HN points 08 Jun 23
  1. Universities can address polarization and free speech issues on and off campus.
  2. For a liberal society, universities should actively foster a culture of free speech and tolerance.
  3. Despite challenges, universities play a crucial role in challenging students with diverse ideas and helping them evaluate beliefs.
The Bigger Picture 0 implied HN points 22 Feb 21
  1. Philosopher Jules Evans discusses the delicate nature of free speech in a new series called Philosophical Journeys.
  2. The post seems to focus on the complexity and importance of navigating issues related to free speech.
  3. Interested readers can access the full post archives with a 7-day free trial subscription to The Bigger Picture.
The Oyster Club 0 implied HN points 10 Aug 23
  1. Universities should prioritize academic freedom, even if politicians disagree with some content.
  2. Political interference with academic work can have chilling effects on research and critical discussions.
  3. Faculty at public universities should be allowed independence in their research and teaching, free from excessive political influence.
The Oyster Club 0 implied HN points 14 Sep 23
  1. The Heckler's Veto is when an audience disrupts a speaker, and it's been happening more frequently.
  2. Silencing speakers does not help combat bad ideas, and it's not a form of protected speech.
  3. Allowing the Heckler's Veto limits our ability to discover truth and promotes anti-free speech behavior.
Wayne's Earth 0 implied HN points 11 Oct 23
  1. The modern left claims to champion tolerance and acceptance but often silences differing opinions, showcasing hypocrisy.
  2. Methods of the modern left can further segregate society through emphasis on identity politics rather than uniting through fundamental values.
  3. Despite portraying themselves as advocates of free speech and evidence-based decision-making, the modern left dismisses dissenting viewpoints and stifles honest discussions, hindering real progress.
Wayne's Earth 0 implied HN points 06 Jan 23
  1. Free speech is crucial for a healthy democracy, enabling citizens to express opinions without fear of censorship and contributing to public dialogue and understanding.
  2. Protecting free speech involves not only defending individuals' right to speak out, but also actively listening to and respecting the opinions of others to foster civil discourse and bridge divides.
  3. Despite challenges, free speech must be upheld and promoted as a fundamental right that helps safeguard citizens' voices and facilitates important conversations in society.
Thái | Hacker | Kỹ sư tin tặc 0 implied HN points 08 Jan 16
  1. In politics, it's common to have different factions and conflicts. It's important to have the freedom to express dissenting opinions and protect those who speak out, even if they criticize those in power.
  2. The foundation of a sustainable country lies in upholding the constitution and allowing people to voice their opinions without fear of retribution. It's vital to listen to divergent views and engage in constructive debates for development.
  3. Ultimately, it's the people who hold the power in a country. It's crucial for the citizens to stand up for individuals like journalists who speak truth to power, even if their views may not align with everyone.