The hottest War Policy Substack posts right now

A recent 'peace plan' regarding the Russo-Ukrainian war seems more focused on benefiting a few powerful individuals rather than actually achieving peace, showing a lack of true American diplomacy.
The document claims to address Ukraine's sovereignty but actually undermines it, making demands that benefit Russia while ignoring its aggressive actions in the war.
Key proposals in the plan reflect Russian interests, such as limiting Ukraine's military and preventing it from joining NATO, raising concerns about the overall intention to weaken Ukraine rather than support it.

A potential war with Iran could lead to huge loss of life and serious global problems, making it critical to stop such plans.
There might be manipulation and propaganda used to convince people to support the war, so it's important to be skeptical of the information shared.
It's essential to speak out against the warmongering and show strong opposition, as supporting this war goes against the well-being of humanity.

The administration is refusing to set a timeline for finding a rationale and looks willing to be in this conflict for the long haul.
Officials keep insisting the mission has clear objectives, but that defensive tone makes the objectives seem vague and unconvincing.
They claim it’s not a regime change war, yet celebrating the killing of the Ayatollah reads like political decapitation and undercuts that claim even though the regime remains in power.

Many people in Ukraine and the U.S. want the war to end, but it continues to escalate. It's frustrating that instead of working toward peace, governments push for more conflict.
The idea of protecting democracy through war seems hollow when the focus is on sending young people to fight instead of finding solutions.
Independent media can often get caught up in mainstream narratives, leading some to lose sight of their original purpose. Authentic voices are important for meaningful discussions.

Joe Sacco uses graphic journalism to share stories from war zones, bringing a unique perspective that traditional media often misses. His work combines drawings and humor to convey tough realities.
Sacco raises important questions about how we define aggression and self-defense, especially in context of the violence in Gaza. He suggests we need new terms to describe the complex nature of these conflicts.
The discussion highlights the moral dilemmas faced in voting and supporting policies that contribute to violence, questioning how citizens can remain complicit while wanting change.

Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

Hate and revenge can be taught from one generation to the next, much like a curse that keeps going.
The actions of powerful countries, like the U.S. and Israel, have serious consequences that may lead to more violence and retribution.
It's important to remember the past and understand that people who suffer might seek revenge, which can lead to cycles of violence that never seem to end.

It’s important to understand that we may not have the power to stop a war once it's started, as many factors lead to these conflicts. Instead of trying to be a hero and fix everything, we should focus on building communities dedicated to peace.
Creating lasting peace requires inner work and a shift in how we think about conflict. We need to change the stories we tell ourselves about war and understand that many problems stem from past solutions that don’t work anymore.
The urgency we feel during crises is a reminder that issues have always been present. Instead of just reacting to immediate conflicts, we should address the deeper reasons behind them and work continuously towards peace.

Limiting military deployment without a declaration of war can reduce the chances of entering unnecessary conflicts. This means fewer soldiers would be put at risk without Congress's approval.
If Congress declares war, it gives the President more power, but if no declaration exists and military action is taken, the President loses some legislative influence. This balances the powers between Congress and the President.
The proposed amendment aims to discourage both Congress and the President from engaging in military actions lightly, promoting accountability and encouraging the end of wars when necessary.