The hottest International relations Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top World Politics Topics
Astral Codex Ten • 23332 implied HN points • 25 Mar 26
  1. Supporters mostly want a negotiated international or bilateral pause with China that’s transparent, mutually enforceable, and monitored, not a unilateral stop.
  2. Opponents worry a pause would let rivals—especially China—race ahead and use that lead to damage national security, freedoms, or economic standing.
  3. A compromise idea is a conditional, staged pause with clear red/green lines and light-touch monitoring that slows new training while allowing useful AI services to keep running.
Simplicius's Garden of Knowledge • 13388 implied HN points • 29 Oct 24
  1. The situation in Ukraine is escalating with new claims of North Korean troop involvement, but there are doubts about the validity of these reports. It seems like a way to either justify war actions or divert attention from failures.
  2. Russian forces are making significant territorial gains in the south, suggesting they are currently in a strong position. This pressures Ukraine to maintain its last strongholds and potentially call for more foreign assistance.
  3. The European and American media narratives seem increasingly disconnected from reality. There are worries that misinformation and exaggerated claims are leading to misunderstanding and escalation of the conflict.
Simplicius's Garden of Knowledge • 12389 implied HN points • 27 Oct 24
  1. Zelensky suggested that both Ukraine and Russia should stop attacking each other's energy facilities to avoid a harsh winter. This shows that Ukraine's strikes on Russian infrastructure were more about self-defense than actually crippling Russia.
  2. Putin is preparing to offer different negotiation terms depending on the outcome of the US presidential elections. He is looking to use these negotiations to maintain control over the territories gained in Ukraine.
  3. Ukraine is facing significant troop shortages, which is leading to a decrease in military mobilization. There are discussions about lowering the draft age, highlighting the urgency for Ukraine to bolster its forces.
Simplicius's Garden of Knowledge • 11630 implied HN points • 25 Oct 24
  1. The BRICS summit showed a strong sense of unity and cooperation among member countries, contrasting with the often more formal and structured atmosphere of Western summits like the UN.
  2. New partnerships were announced, with 13 countries gaining partner status, which could lead to future full membership in BRICS, signaling a shift in global power dynamics.
  3. The summit also emphasized acceptance and diplomacy, with countries like Iran and Venezuela receiving respect and legitimacy on the world stage, promoting a message of collaboration and open dialogue.
God's Spies by Thomas Neuburger • 1141 implied HN points • 26 Mar 26
  1. Israel may be nearing a breaking point as actual casualties and the everyday strain of sheltering and nonstop attacks are likely far worse than reported, and public and political tolerance for the war has limits.
  2. Israel’s air defenses may be close to collapse after radar damage, leaving it vulnerable to Iranian drones and high-speed missiles that can strike military bases and cities and could force more desperate Israeli options.
  3. A nuclear strike by Israel on Iran could provoke an Iranian retaliatory use of low-yield nukes, causing catastrophic casualties in cities like Tel Aviv and risking uncontrollable regional escalation.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
Wrong Side of History • 403 implied HN points • 14 Mar 26
  1. A widespread hunger for meaning and recognition is driving people into intense political causes and zero-sum fights, which can fuel polarization and destabilize liberal democracies.
  2. Many institutions and communities are fraying — from shrinking cities and collapsing recruitment to unsustainable welfare, energy, and defence arrangements — and without a renewed shared identity or civic project, economic and strategic decline will likely worsen.
  3. New technologies are democratizing power to game systems and to surveil or strike at will, undermining traditional institutions and forcing them to adapt or lose legitimacy.
Simplicius's Garden of Knowledge • 8572 implied HN points • 22 Oct 24
  1. Russia's military production is increasing rapidly, even surpassing the losses they faced in Ukraine. This means they are becoming stronger despite the conflict.
  2. Ukraine's air defense is not as effective as reported, with lower interception rates than the government claims. This highlights a gap between what is being communicated and the reality on the ground.
  3. Germany's military capabilities are struggling to keep up, and in some areas, they are declining. They would need up to 100 years to rebuild their military stockpiles to past levels, in stark contrast to Russia's quick production capabilities.
Simplicius's Garden of Knowledge • 11510 implied HN points • 19 Oct 24
  1. Zelensky has suggested that Ukraine's security depends on either NATO membership or nuclear capabilities. This has raised significant concerns and discussions among Western allies.
  2. A Ukrainian official claimed that Ukraine could quickly create nuclear weapons if necessary, although this was later denied by Zelensky's office amid backlash.
  3. The nuclear threats appear to be aimed more at pressuring Ukraine's allies than at Russia itself, highlighting Ukraine's desperation for support in the ongoing conflict.
Simplicius's Garden of Knowledge • 12909 implied HN points • 17 Oct 24
  1. Zelensky presented a 'Victory Plan' for Ukraine that hopes to invite NATO membership and ramp up military support. Many people found his ideas unrealistic and lacking substance.
  2. One key point of the plan suggests deploying a strong military deterrent to protect Ukraine from Russia. This has raised concerns about the possible involvement of NATO forces on the ground.
  3. Concerns are growing over the U.S.'s ability to support Ukraine indefinitely, with officials stating they can't provide unlimited resources. This hints at potential limits to Ukraine's military ambitions.
Simplicius's Garden of Knowledge • 12429 implied HN points • 15 Oct 24
  1. Ukraine is facing increasing military pressure from Russia, and the situation for Ukraine seems to be worsening. There are discussions about possibly giving up some territory to reach a peace deal.
  2. Germany is cutting its financial support for Ukraine significantly, leading to concerns about the future of military assistance. This reduction could impact Ukraine's ability to sustain its defense.
  3. Zelensky is expected to address the Ukrainian parliament soon, where he may propose a new plan for victory, but there are hints that this plan might involve compromises regarding territory.
Glenn’s Substack • 2318 implied HN points • 02 Oct 24
  1. The US faces a serious economic crisis due to high debt levels and declining fiscal responsibility. The country has been unable to effectively address these financial issues since the 2008 crisis.
  2. Efforts to boost US competitiveness, like subsidies and sanctions, often backfire and may harm the economy more. In contrast, countries like China are gaining strength by diversifying their economies and forming new partnerships.
  3. As the US struggles, other countries are building a new economic system that doesn't rely on America. This shift might create a world where multiple powers coexist, rather than one dominant force.
Simplicius's Garden of Knowledge • 13029 implied HN points • 11 Oct 24
  1. Ukraine's situation is worsening as they struggle against renewed Russian advances. Zelensky is seeking support from allies to end the conflict but is facing growing pressures.
  2. There are discussions about a potential ceasefire, but Zelensky is caught between showing strength and the reality of needing to make concessions. He wants to maintain the appearance of not giving up land.
  3. Infighting and low morale are rising among pro-Ukrainian supporters. Many feel that the West won't provide the necessary support to achieve victory against Russia.
Simplicius's Garden of Knowledge • 13848 implied HN points • 06 Oct 24
  1. Ukrainian troops are facing major issues, like mutinies and lack of resources. Many soldiers are unwilling to fight due to insufficient training and equipment.
  2. The fall of Ugledar shows how serious the losses are for Ukraine. Brigades are being dramatically reduced in numbers, with some units losing nearly all their members.
  3. There's a growing sentiment among Ukrainian soldiers and officials that negotiations might be necessary to end the conflict. Many are feeling the emotional and physical toll of the ongoing war.
Simplicius's Garden of Knowledge • 11030 implied HN points • 08 Oct 24
  1. Ukraine may consider giving up some land to stop the fighting, as they can't easily challenge Russia's control. Western allies are worried about the ongoing conflict and its costs.
  2. Russia wants a permanent solution to the conflict, not just a temporary ceasefire. They have specific demands, like Ukraine remaining neutral and giving up certain territories.
  3. There are doubts about whether the U.S. or NATO would back Ukraine joining their alliance, as this could lead to more tensions. Trusting outside nations to guarantee Ukraine's neutrality is also a big issue.
Simplicius's Garden of Knowledge • 14008 implied HN points • 04 Oct 24
  1. Israel faced significant challenges with its air defenses when Iranian missile strikes were more successful than previous attacks. This suggests that Iran has been learning and improving its strategies.
  2. There's a mix of opinions about whether Iran was really trying to hit specific targets or just sending a message. Some believe the strikes were accurate while others think they were done to avoid major damage.
  3. Tensions are rising as Israel and the US are contemplating serious military responses against Iran, while Iran has managed to strengthen ties with other countries like Saudi Arabia amidst these conflicts.
Silver Bulletin • 618 implied HN points • 17 Mar 26
  1. Counting on a leader to always chicken out is a risky strategy. When someone usually faces few consequences, they’re more likely to take bold or reckless actions.
  2. Markets don’t act like a single rational player, so the idea that market panic will reliably force policy reversals (the “Trump put”) is unstable. Market behavior can be chaotic, uncoordinated, and sometimes escalate rather than deter.
  3. War in the Middle East is a multilateral fog-of-war problem with many actors who can change the dynamics. That makes outcomes, like oil shocks or unintended escalation, much harder to predict and potentially irreversible.
Glenn’s Substack • 1798 implied HN points • 27 Sep 24
  1. The Nord Stream pipeline attack severed Europe's energy ties with Russia, leading to significant economic changes for both regions.
  2. Initially, the US and NATO blamed Russia for the attack, but later reports suggested that Ukraine might have been involved while evidence pointed to a possible US connection.
  3. As the narrative around the attack evolved, European nations began to turn against each other, showing tensions and doubts about their alliances.
Pieter’s Newsletter • 259 implied HN points • 28 Oct 24
  1. Israel's recent attack on Iran was smart and planned, aiming to weaken Iran's defenses without causing much harm to civilians.
  2. The attack has raised doubts about Iran's leadership and how they protect their citizens, leading to growing discontent among the Iranian people.
  3. The situation highlights a stark contrast between Israel's modern military and Iran's struggling forces, showing a potential for change in the region.
Gordian Knot News • 124 implied HN points • 21 Mar 26
  1. The Iran War could lead to an attack on the Barakah nuclear plant in the UAE, creating a real risk of radioactive release.
  2. Having a reliable plume dispersion model and an accurate radiation harm model ready is essential, because poor modeling or panic can multiply the actual harm.
  3. Common tools like MACCS2 for plumes and the linear no‑threshold (LNT) harm model are inadequate and using them would worsen the response, yet no organization currently appears to have the right capability—a serious system failure.
Glenn’s Substack • 1199 implied HN points • 24 Sep 24
  1. NATO is seen by some as outdated and stuck in Cold War thinking. It focuses on dividing the world into good and evil, which may not lead to real security.
  2. The expansion of NATO has created conflicts rather than resolving them. This approach often leads to more militarization and tensions with countries like Russia.
  3. There's a call for a new way of thinking about security that includes cooperation with former adversaries instead of forming exclusive military alliances.
Glenn’s Substack • 1278 implied HN points • 23 Sep 24
  1. NATO's involvement in Ukraine has escalated tensions and contributed to the conflict. This involvement is seen as a major factor in Russia's decision to invade Ukraine.
  2. There were opportunities for peace that were sabotaged by Western leaders, showing that the conflict has become a proxy war. This raises concerns that Ukraine is being used as a tool in a larger geopolitical struggle.
  3. The situation risks escalating to a nuclear war as Russia views NATO's presence as an existential threat. The current standoff is very dangerous, and many feel it could lead to severe consequences.
Gulf Stream Blues • 59 implied HN points • 31 Oct 24
  1. If Trump wins again, it could boost far-right parties in Europe. These parties are gaining popularity but not as much as Trump in the U.S.
  2. Some European leaders think a Trump presidency could shock Europe into becoming more independent. However, there's skepticism about whether this will really happen.
  3. It's likely that Europe's far-right might come together in support of Trump rather than against him, which could strengthen their power and influence.
Glenn’s Substack • 1039 implied HN points • 24 Sep 24
  1. The conflict in Gaza is spreading and could bring in more countries, which worries local leaders facing protests for not being tougher against Israel and the US.
  2. Ukraine is struggling with a lack of resources, and the situation is getting worse as public support is fading and political divisions grow.
  3. Both the Middle East and Ukraine are heading towards major wars, and the US seems to lack a clear plan to deal with these rising tensions.
TK News by Matt Taibbi • 10203 implied HN points • 23 Jan 26
  1. A senior U.S. commerce official publicly declared that globalization has failed and argued for an America‑first approach that prioritizes domestic workers over offshoring.
  2. Those remarks mattered more than the headline-grabbing political theater at Davos because they directly challenged the World Economic Forum’s pro-globalization consensus and signaled a real policy shift.
  3. The speech sparked boos, walkouts, and outrage among global elites, exposing deep divisions and forcing Europe and others to rethink competitiveness and self-reliance.
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2086 implied HN points • 26 Feb 26
  1. Some U.S. officials reportedly want Israel to strike Iran first so an Iranian retaliation against U.S. assets would create political cover for a U.S. war.
  2. Government leaders and mainstream media are pushing misleading or false claims about Iran’s intentions and capabilities to manufacture public support for military action.
  3. Because the U.S. and Israel have pursued sanctions, military deployments, covert actions, and attacks that escalate tensions, any Iranian retaliation that kills U.S. or Israeli troops would be the consequence of those provocations and thus their responsibility.
Phillips’s Newsletter • 346 implied HN points • 18 Mar 26
  1. The US and Israel are running a high-tech air campaign that can strike many targets and kill leaders, but that military edge has not yet forced political collapse or produced internal allies to end the war.
  2. Iran is fighting a very different, low-cost campaign that uses its coastline, drones, and sea drones to threaten shipping through the Strait of Hormuz and disrupt the global economy in order to pressure opponents politically.
  3. Both sides are racing against time: US political pressure (especially on the president) raises the risk of escalation, while Iran hopes to outlast strikes, so the conflict could intensify before it eases.
The Chris Hedges Report • 345 implied HN points • 12 Mar 26
  1. The U.S. and Israel miscalculated by launching the attack on Iran; there is no clear military exit and the campaign risks a humiliating defeat that could weaken American influence in the region.
  2. Iran is using a smart asymmetric strategy—missiles, drones, and threats to close the Strait of Hormuz while targeting energy and desalination infrastructure—to inflict economic pain and gain bargaining leverage.
  3. The conflict could trigger a major global economic shock, push Gulf states to rethink their ties with the U.S., and draw more Russian and Chinese support for Iran, multiplying long-term geopolitical risks for Israel and America.
Glenn’s Substack • 1718 implied HN points • 17 Sep 24
  1. NATO's support for Ukraine is often framed as a selfless act to help against Russia, but it may not align with what most Ukrainians actually want. Many Ukrainians have shown little interest in joining NATO.
  2. There have been several instances where peace agreements, such as the Minsk-2 agreement, were ignored or sabotaged by Western powers, showing that their true interests may lie elsewhere.
  3. The situation in Ukraine has led to severe consequences for the population, with many lives lost and a push towards nationalism and division, rather than unity and peace.
Glenn’s Substack • 1978 implied HN points • 14 Sep 24
  1. Putin believes that long-range missiles provided by NATO will turn the conflict into a direct war between NATO and Russia. He warns this could escalate to nuclear war.
  2. The situation reflects a shift from a proxy war, where NATO supported Ukraine against Russia indirectly, to a direct confrontation. Incremental steps by NATO have blurred the lines between these two types of conflict.
  3. There is a concern that Russia will respond aggressively if NATO attacks. This could lead to serious escalation, putting the world at risk of a nuclear exchange.
Faster, Please! • 913 implied HN points • 09 Mar 26
  1. Energy is civilization's universal currency. Almost everything we do needs energy transformed into useful work, and our prosperity depends on mastering that transformation.
  2. Geopolitical conflicts and shocks quickly show how vulnerable modern life is to fuel disruptions, for example by pushing up gasoline prices.
  3. The global food system relies heavily on fossil-fuel-driven processes like using natural gas for the Haber-Bosch fertilizer synthesis, so energy disruptions can raise fertilizer and food costs worldwide.
Glenn’s Substack • 1099 implied HN points • 20 Sep 24
  1. BRICS is working to create a new economic system that doesn't depend on the US. This means countries can trade and cooperate without worrying about US control.
  2. There is a strong desire among countries to join BRICS and work together to trade in their own currencies instead of the US dollar. This could help protect their economies from US influence.
  3. BRICS aims to foster connections between diverse nations, including rivals, to manage political issues through economic collaboration, rather than division. This could lead to a more cooperative global environment.
Glenn’s Substack • 1119 implied HN points • 19 Sep 24
  1. The US is no longer the dominant world power. There is a shift towards a multipolar world where multiple countries have influence.
  2. Western leaders struggle to imagine new ways of working in this multipolar world. They often want to cling to old ideas of Western dominance instead of adapting.
  3. Instead of trying to restore past power dynamics, the West should look for new opportunities that come with this change in global power.
The Saturday Read • 459 implied HN points • 19 Oct 24
  1. Yahya Sinwar, the leader of Hamas, was killed by Israeli forces, highlighting ongoing violence in Gaza. His death might temporarily limit the threat from Hamas, but deep issues remain unresolved for both sides.
  2. A kibbutz resident expressed that after recent violence, his focus has shifted solely to protecting his own family rather than helping those in Gaza. This shows the intense personal strife and survival mindset amidst conflict.
  3. The region faces a complex situation where even after Sinwar's death, the future remains uncertain. It raises concerns about possible retaliation and the rebuilding of Gaza, which has suffered immense destruction.
Phillips’s Newsletter • 271 implied HN points • 16 Mar 26
  1. Trump is speeding the U.S.’s decline by deliberately weakening core pillars like social cohesion, political institutions, and the military’s ability to think.
  2. Alliances are a central source of American global power and are essential for winning wars, so damaging the U.S.-led alliance system severely weakens the country’s position.
  3. The administration only just seemed to realize alliances matter, but after actively trying to undermine them the damage may already be hard to undo.
Glenn’s Substack • 1838 implied HN points • 06 Sep 24
  1. Scandinavia is shifting from a peaceful region to a frontline for the US military, which might lead to more conflicts. Countries like Norway are hosting US military bases, causing Russia to feel threatened.
  2. The history shows that when one country's security increases, it often makes neighboring countries feel less secure, leading to a security competition. This was the case during the Cold War with Finland and Sweden acting as neutral states to reduce tensions.
  3. NATO's expansion, including Sweden and Finland joining, is seen by some as a major mistake. It might actually increase tensions rather than provide security, as past experiences suggest that surrounding a country with military alliances can provoke it.
Glenn’s Substack • 1718 implied HN points • 02 Sep 24
  1. Russia and China are building a new trade route for grain. This helps Russia sell more food to China, taking market share away from US farmers.
  2. The BRICS nations are creating a new system that makes the US dollar less important in trade. This means countries can trade more freely without US influence.
  3. US farmers are struggling to get the information they need about global markets. Without this info, they can't make good decisions about what crops to plant.
Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2686 implied HN points • 31 Jan 26
  1. Focus criticism on the western empire because that is the power structure people actually live under and can influence. It is often the main source of militarism and global abuse.
  2. Mainstream media push an "Official Bad Guy" narrative to manufacture consent for aggression, which trains people to criticize foreign regimes instead of questioning their own leaders.
  3. Refusing to criticize a foreign government can be a principled choice when such criticism would feed imperial war propaganda; opposing warmongering agendas is a legitimate moral stance.
Chartbook • 515 implied HN points • 25 Feb 26
  1. The newsletter highlights arguments for shrinking government, focusing on debates over cutting public spending and reducing state power.
  2. It spotlights work-time reform, especially interest in a Dutch four-day workweek and its implications for productivity and living standards.
  3. It includes provocative biographical and intellectual pieces linking controversial figures and ideas, for example material involving Epstein and Dalio and writings about Keynes’s personal views.
Erick Erickson's Confessions of a Political Junkie • 1019 implied HN points • 02 Oct 24
  1. The recent Vice Presidential debate showed a surprising level of respect between candidates, with JD Vance appearing to win the exchanges better than Tim Walz.
  2. Doug Emhoff, Vice President Kamala Harris's husband, has been accused of assaulting an ex-girlfriend, which could impact public perception.
  3. Israel responded to a large missile attack from Iran and is expected to retaliate targeting Iran's financial and energy sectors, which shows rising tensions in the region.
Glenn’s Substack • 939 implied HN points • 10 Sep 24
  1. Germany's current approach to foreign policy often neglects its own national interests, which could lead to negative consequences for the country.
  2. There is a historical pattern of Germany sacrificing its interests for external powers, similar to its past under France and now the US.
  3. A rise in nationalism may occur as a reaction to this neglect, with people seeking to reclaim control over their national identity and sovereignty.