The hottest Legal analysis Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics

Covid mRNA Vaccines Required No Safety Oversight: Part Three

Human Flourishing • 1297 implied HN points • 18 Jan 24
🏥 Health Politics Vaccines Legal analysis Government oversight Medical Ethics
  1. Emergency Use Authorization for Covid mRNA vaccines was based on legal categorization of SARS-Cov-2 as a biological weapon to bypass safety protocols.
  2. FDA has lower evidence standards for Emergency Use Authorization, questioning the safety and effectiveness of products authorized in this way.
  3. Emergency Use Authorization pathway lacks systematic data collection, retrospective studies, informed consent, and institutional review board involvement, raising legal and safety concerns.

Is the Supreme Court seriously going to disqualify Trump?

Adam's Legal Newsletter • 619 implied HN points • 03 Sep 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal analysis Supreme Court Insurrection Presidency
  1. There is a 10% chance that the Supreme Court finds Trump ineligible for the Presidency under Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  2. Legal challenges to Trump's eligibility would have to navigate multiple obstacles, including Supreme Court acceptance and factual interpretation of the insurrection on January 6, 2021.
  3. The legal argument that the 1872 and 1898 Amnesty Acts remove Section Three's prohibition may present a significant threshold objection to Trump's disqualification.

The horseshoe theory of law

Adam's Legal Newsletter • 399 implied HN points • 16 Oct 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Judicial system Legal analysis
  1. The Fifth Circuit's order in the Louisiana redistricting litigation showcases a convergence in judicial approaches between very conservative and very progressive judges, illustrating what can be termed as the horseshoe theory of jurisprudence.
  2. The previous style of progressive judging, exhibited by judges like Stephen Reinhardt and Harry Pregerson, often involved ruling on grounds not argued by parties, relying on personal sense of justice as established law, and taking extraordinary measures for desired outcomes.
  3. The Fifth Circuit's recent mandamus order reflects principles commonly associated with progressive judges, such as ruling sua sponte, viewing the Supreme Court as an antagonist, and deciding issues with a primary goal of advancing personal vision of justice.

Import AI 325: Automated mad science; AI vs democracy; and a 12B parameter language model

Import AI • 419 implied HN points • 17 Apr 23
🕹 Technology AI Democracy Language Models Robotics Legal analysis
  1. Prompt injection could be a major security risk in AI systems, making them vulnerable to unintended actions and compromising user privacy.
  2. The concentration of AI development in private companies poses a threat to democracy, as these language models encode the normative intentions of their creators without democratic oversight.
  3. The rapid race to build 'god-like AI' in the private sector is raising concerns about the lack of understanding and oversight, with experts warning about potential dangers to humanity.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

Birthright Citizenship Will be Overturned

Who is Robert Malone • 22 implied HN points • 10 Dec 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Citizenship Immigration Legal analysis Constitutional Law
  1. President Trump plans to end birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants. This would change the current law that grants citizenship to all babies born in the U.S.
  2. The 14th Amendment has a key phrase, 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof,' which many believe should limit citizenship based on the parents' legal status.
  3. There is a strong opinion that Congress can clarify the 14th Amendment to exclude children of illegal aliens, signaling a big shift in immigration policy in the coming years.

More Thoughts On Intellectual Diversity In Biglaw

Original Jurisdiction • 599 implied HN points • 17 Feb 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Ideology Ethics Diversity Legal analysis Free speech
  1. Big Law firms have a lack of intellectual diversity which is not beneficial for the legal profession.
  2. There is pressure on Big Law firms to conform to certain ideological standards based on clients' expectations.
  3. Encouraging diverse perspectives and civil discourse in the workplace can lead to better outcomes and a more enjoyable environment.

The least significant cases of the decade

Adam's Legal Newsletter • 239 implied HN points • 28 May 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal analysis Supreme Court Civil Service
  1. The Supreme Court ruled on cases that were deemed to be the least significant of the decade, based on various factors like legal issues, difficulty, and practical impact.
  2. The cases analyzed had low scores for interesting facts, law, and difficulty, with some even receiving a total score of zero for insignificance.
  3. Specific cases like 'Kloeckner v. Solis' were highlighted for being particularly unremarkable in terms of facts, law, significance, and practical impact.

The Legal Megalomania of Intersectionality

Year Zero • 13 implied HN points • 23 Aug 23
🚌 Education Legal analysis
  1. Intersectionality, once niche, has spread widely in policy discussions, even into hard sciences and medicine.
  2. Challenges the assumption that discrimination claims solely fall within single-axis frameworks, highlighting legal cases that refute this.
  3. Asserts that broad claims about intersectionality's implications for discrimination and oppression lack empirical evidence and nuanced discussion.

Good Job Supreme Court

startupdreams • 0 implied HN points • 05 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal analysis Supreme Court 14th Amendment Congress Elections
  1. The US Supreme Court ruled that Colorado cannot use the 14th Amendment to remove a candidate from the Presidential ballots, highlighting the importance of federal power over state powers.
  2. The unanimous decision of the Supreme Court showcases their commitment to interpreting the law based on the Constitution and not succumbing to political pressures or biases.
  3. The decision allows for potential Congressional actions regarding candidate disqualification, with implications on the certification of future election results in case of alleged insurrection.

Supreme Court Justice Venn Diagaram #2: John Roberts

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 30 Mar 12
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court Judiciary Political Figures Legal analysis Government
  1. John Roberts is the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. He plays a big role in deciding important cases.
  2. Understanding how Roberts makes decisions can help us see how the Supreme Court works. His choices can have a major impact on laws and rights.
  3. Venn diagrams can help simplify complex relationships in the court. They show how justices might agree or disagree on different issues.

Supreme Court Justice Venn Diagram #3: Antonin Scalia

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 04 Apr 10
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court Judicial system Legal analysis Political Commentary Government
  1. The Supreme Court has different justices with unique views. It's important to understand these perspectives to know how they influence decisions.
  2. Antonin Scalia was known for his originalist interpretation of the Constitution. He believed in sticking closely to the text as it was originally written.
  3. Visual tools like Venn diagrams can help us compare and contrast the views of different justices in a simple way. This makes complex ideas easier to understand.