The hottest Judicial system Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 765 implied HN points 19 Feb 25
  1. Trump is using a lot of executive orders to make changes quickly, without waiting for new laws, which has sparked debate about his respect for the Constitution.
  2. Some people worry that Trump's harsh criticism of judges who don’t agree with him could hurt the fairness of the courts and lead to bigger legal issues.
  3. A controversial move, like the DOJ dismissing charges against a public figure, might be legal, but it raised eyebrows because it broke traditional rules of how the justice system usually operates.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 2045 implied HN points 18 Dec 24
  1. Jesse Singal faced threats on Bluesky after writing about youth gender transition, showing that even in 'kind' social networks, anger exists.
  2. Abigail Shrier, also targeted for her work on transgender issues, has seen her concerns validated as more countries and states impose restrictions on gender treatments for minors.
  3. The Kurds worry they might be abandoned again by the U.S., fearing violence from Turkish-backed forces as their relationship with America continues to be tested.
The Watch 726 implied HN points 14 Jan 25
  1. A judge in Chicago recently overturned a significant ruling that questioned the reliability of forensic firearms analysis. This ruling had previously stopped prosecutors from presenting certain expert testimony in court.
  2. Forensic firearms analysis lacks strong scientific backing, and there's little evidence showing that analysts can accurately match bullets to guns. This raises doubts about its validity as a reliable tool in criminal cases.
  3. The legal system often prefers to maintain the status quo, which can prevent important scientific critiques from being heard. This means flawed methods can remain in use, making it hard to achieve true justice for those accused.
Popular Information 12539 implied HN points 31 Aug 23
  1. North Carolina Supreme Court Justice Anita Earls is facing sanctions for speaking out about racial discrimination within the court system.
  2. Earls filed a lawsuit against the Judicial Standards Commission asserting her right to free speech as an elected Justice.
  3. There is a dispute over whether Earls' comments on systemic issues in the judiciary constitute protected political speech.
Breaking the News 1398 implied HN points 31 Oct 24
  1. Polls may not accurately capture voter excitement, especially among women, which might lead to surprising results in the election.
  2. There are concerns that Trump isn't trying to win new voters and is instead focused on maintaining his base and planning for post-election strategies.
  3. The rhetoric used by Trump and some rallies can be alarmingly similar to dangerous historical rhetoric, raising concerns about the direction of political discourse.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
Open Source Defense 52 implied HN points 04 Feb 25
  1. Courts are often seen as protectors of rights, but they mainly follow existing rules rather than actively defending individual freedoms. This means real change often comes from cultural shifts instead.
  2. Most criminal cases end in plea deals, not trials. This shows how courts can actually support systems that pressure people into giving up their rights to fight their charges.
  3. Historical examples show that courts sometimes fail to protect rights when it matters most. Cultures and societal values shape the law more than court decisions, so real progress comes from public support and action.
David Friedman’s Substack 323 implied HN points 19 Dec 24
  1. Biden pardoned 39 people convicted of non-violent offenses, mostly related to drugs. This helps them rebuild their lives by removing convictions from their records.
  2. He also commuted the sentences of 1499 others still in prison, allowing them to be released but still keeping their criminal records. Some of these cases drew criticism, especially concerning a judge involved in a major bribery scandal.
  3. Critics argue that Biden's policy to commute sentences was too broad and didn't consider the individual circumstances of those being released. There's concern that some who received commutations, like the corrupt judge, still deserved harsher punishment.
The Reactionary 148 implied HN points 19 Dec 24
  1. Fani Willis, the Fulton County District Attorney, has been disqualified from the criminal case against Donald Trump. This means she and her office can no longer lead the prosecution.
  2. A judge noted serious concerns about fairness and honesty in how the prosecution was handled. It was found that there were problems with the relationships and testimonies of those involved in the case.
  3. The ruling from the Georgia Court of Appeals emphasized that the disqualification is needed to maintain public trust in the court proceedings. Without this action, the legitimacy of the prosecution was seen as compromised.
Letters of Note 1886 implied HN points 17 Mar 23
  1. A Scottish judge wrote a letter to children explaining a custody decision
  2. The letter stressed the importance of learning from mistakes
  3. The judge highlighted the positive aspects of the father while addressing the areas of improvement
eugyppius: a plague chronicle 96 implied HN points 21 Nov 24
  1. Some recent court cases in Germany are quite silly, making it important to find humor in them. It's funny when the legal system reacts strongly to harmless things like emojis.
  2. Despite the humor, it's wise to be cautious and prepare for unexpected situations, like police visits. It's better to be safe and plan ahead.
  3. The writer has shared thoughts through interviews about current events in Germany, offering insights into the situation. Listening to these discussions can provide a deeper understanding of ongoing issues.
A Lawyer Writes 432 implied HN points 09 Feb 24
  1. The Pinochet case in London was a unique and groundbreaking event in English legal history.
  2. The case led to significant changes in the English legal system, pushing it into the modern era.
  3. Despite the legal twists and turns, Pinochet was never extradited to Spain due to health reasons.
Diane Francis 899 implied HN points 27 Jul 23
  1. Israel is facing a big political crisis, with many people protesting against Prime Minister Netanyahu's plans that could limit the Supreme Court's power. This has caused divisions among different groups in the country.
  2. The population of ultra-Orthodox Jews (Haredim) is growing fast, and they want to change Israeli society to align with their beliefs. This worries many secular Israelis who want to preserve a more liberal and democratic Israel.
  3. The ongoing issues in Israel, such as economic inequality and the power struggle between the religious and secular groups, could threaten the country's stability and security in the future.
Adam's Legal Newsletter 359 implied HN points 06 Feb 24
  1. The Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, vacated an injunction that restricted the Border Patrol from cutting a fence near the Rio Grande. Governor Abbott disagreed with the decision, claiming Texas's constitutional authority above federal statutes.
  2. Texas put up concertina wire fences near the border to stop illegal immigration, leading to clashes with Border Patrol officials who cut the fences. Issues arose as to whether cutting the fence was justified in enforcing federal immigration law.
  3. The Fifth Circuit granted an injunction to Texas to stop the cutting of the fence, but the Supreme Court, in a 5-4 vote, vacated this injunction without providing any explanation, sparking disagreement and criticism.
Adam's Legal Newsletter 399 implied HN points 16 Oct 23
  1. The Fifth Circuit's order in the Louisiana redistricting litigation showcases a convergence in judicial approaches between very conservative and very progressive judges, illustrating what can be termed as the horseshoe theory of jurisprudence.
  2. The previous style of progressive judging, exhibited by judges like Stephen Reinhardt and Harry Pregerson, often involved ruling on grounds not argued by parties, relying on personal sense of justice as established law, and taking extraordinary measures for desired outcomes.
  3. The Fifth Circuit's recent mandamus order reflects principles commonly associated with progressive judges, such as ruling sua sponte, viewing the Supreme Court as an antagonist, and deciding issues with a primary goal of advancing personal vision of justice.
Adam's Legal Newsletter 339 implied HN points 04 Aug 23
  1. One proposed idea is Supreme Court Roulette, where a randomly selected Justice's view becomes the opinion of the Court.
  2. The current system of majority rule in the Supreme Court does not necessarily guarantee better or more reasoned decisions.
  3. Implementing Supreme Court Roulette could lead to more moderate decisions reflective of the country and improve incentives for the Justices.
Taipology 49 implied HN points 11 Jan 25
  1. A big rally happened to support former TPP leader Ko Wen-je, showcasing many people's loyalty to him despite his corruption charges. This gathering highlighted concerns about how the justice system in Taiwan may be misused against political opponents.
  2. Some speakers at the rally shared personal stories of facing unfair legal challenges. They argued that prosecutors are targeting political rivals, making people fear for their rights and freedoms.
  3. The event sparked a new sense of unity among different political parties in Taiwan, showing that they can come together against a common issue. This shift may lead to changes in the political landscape of Taiwan.
School Shooting Data Analysis and Reports 59 implied HN points 11 Apr 24
  1. A 6-year-old student attempted to shoot his teacher a second time, highlighting the importance of considering elementary school students in school security measures.
  2. School shooting incident revealed lapses in security procedures, such as doors being locked hindering police response and potential prevention of further harm.
  3. School staff need proper training and systems in place to handle emergencies effectively, like searching for weapons or sending timely alerts to parents.
John’s Substack 15 implied HN points 30 Nov 24
  1. Trump's foreign policy decisions seem different from his campaign promises, especially regarding the Ukraine war.
  2. There's ongoing discussion about Israel's issues and claims of anti-Semitism in American institutions.
  3. The Judge's podcast offers an alternative perspective to mainstream media, which is seen as failing the public recently.
Geopolitical Economy Report 159 implied HN points 09 Dec 22
  1. Argentina's former President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner was banned from office after being sentenced to prison, leading to accusations of a judicial coup by corrupt judges and media oligarchs.
  2. Leaked messages revealed a conspiracy involving corrupt Argentine prosecutors, right-wing opposition politicians, conservative media corporations, and former intelligence officers colluding against Kirchner.
  3. The $44 billion debt Argentina owes to the International Monetary Fund was highlighted as a mechanism of control and dependency on economic and political policies, impacting the country's economic situation and political landscape.
Matt’s Five Points 0 implied HN points 04 Apr 10
  1. The Supreme Court has different justices with unique views. It's important to understand these perspectives to know how they influence decisions.
  2. Antonin Scalia was known for his originalist interpretation of the Constitution. He believed in sticking closely to the text as it was originally written.
  3. Visual tools like Venn diagrams can help us compare and contrast the views of different justices in a simple way. This makes complex ideas easier to understand.
School Shooting Data Analysis and Reports 0 implied HN points 25 Mar 23
  1. The teen shooter believed he had gun rights at school based on his interpretation of the Second Amendment, showcasing the influence of strong pro-gun beliefs.
  2. The limitations of reporting apps were evident in this case - despite prior reports and suspicions, without concrete evidence, actions like suspension or expulsion couldn't be taken.
  3. The case highlights issues with state laws, such as lax regulation of gun kits and the ability for individuals to refuse house searches, impacting efforts to prevent gun violence.