The hottest Judiciary Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics

One Voice

Steady • 27772 implied HN points • 06 Feb 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Trump Courts Presidency Judiciary
  1. A federal appeals court rejected Donald Trump's immunity claim for alleged crimes regarding the 2020 election.
  2. The court panel comprised of judges from both Democratic and Republican parties unanimously ruled against Trump.
  3. Trump has a tight deadline to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court as his legal strategies face challenges.

Election Countdown, 243 Days to Go: Four Mysteries After ‘Super Tuesday.’

Breaking the News • 474 implied HN points • 08 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Election Media Coverage Judiciary
  1. The press has been portraying both Biden and Trump as losers, but one of them will win the election based on various factors like support, achievements, and obstacles.
  2. Mainstream press coverage and expert 'framing' could influence voter perception of candidates, but election outcomes are more likely determined by fundamental factors like party unity and public priorities.
  3. The question of the Supreme Court's limits and potential consequences of it going too far is a matter for paid subscribers to explore in the context of the upcoming election.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

Carr lays down the law

A Lawyer Writes • 1395 implied HN points • 17 Jan 24
🌍 World Politics Judiciary Legislation Security Reforms
  1. The Lady Chief Justice clarified the constitutional relationship between the executive and judiciary.
  2. Baroness Carr emphasized the judiciary's exclusive responsibility for judicial deployment and matters.
  3. Carr outlined priorities such as promoting judicial strengths, unity, and addressing backlogs in the judiciary system.

Rwanda: This is what happens next

Striking 13 • 3014 implied HN points • 17 Nov 23
🌍 World Politics Asylum Judiciary Legislation Supreme Court
  1. The government in Rwanda is attempting to implement controversial policies, but they are facing significant challenges and obstacles at every step.
  2. The plan for dealing with asylum seekers is chaotic and unrealistic, resulting in confusion and uncertainty for all parties involved, including potential legal consequences.
  3. There are complex legal, constitutional, and parliamentary hurdles that the government needs to overcome in order to push through their proposed legislation, indicating a tough road ahead if they intend to proceed.

That's Not How Recusal Works, That's Not How Any Of This Works!

The Popehat Report • 4350 implied HN points • 13 Jun 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Judiciary Government
  1. Recusal law may not work how you expect, it has specific criteria for judges to disqualify themselves.
  2. Federal courts interpret recusal statutes narrowly, focusing on objective criteria rather than subjective views.
  3. Motions to recuse judges are rarely granted based on their conduct in a case; usually require evidence of bias from an extrajudicial source.

Viewing the courts

A Lawyer Writes • 353 implied HN points • 07 Feb 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Government Judiciary Transparency Media
  1. Lady chief justice emphasizes the importance of high-quality reporting for the public's understanding of the judiciary.
  2. Efforts are being made to enhance broadcasting of court proceedings in England and Wales, including televising sentencing remarks.
  3. Transparency in the courts is seen as a fundamental part of the process in allowing proper access to justice.

Trump's Immunity Argument on Appeal

SHERO • 589 implied HN points • 09 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Presidency Investigation Judiciary
  1. A panel of federal appellate court judges signaled rejection of Trump's claim of immunity from prosecution for charges related to the 2020 election overturn.
  2. The court discussed potential rulings that could dismiss Trump's appeal, which may impact the future of the case and the Supreme Court's involvement.
  3. Trump's attorney argued for presidential immunity from prosecution for actions taken while in office, presenting concerns about accountability and separation of powers.

How to Fix the US Supreme Court

The Garden of Forking Paths • 1552 implied HN points • 11 Jul 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Judiciary Reform Bipartisanship Democrats Republicans
  1. The US Supreme Court is highly politicized with lifetime appointments causing a imbalance of power.
  2. By looking at models from small island nations, like Comoros and Fiji, we can find ways to reform the US Supreme Court using consociationalism and centripetalism.
  3. Proposed solutions for Supreme Court reform include changing the judicial selection process to be nonpartisan and considering power-sharing models like in New Jersey or requiring a supermajority vote for confirmations.

Missing Fixed Effects Don't Justify Segregation

Cremieux Recueil • 199 implied HN points • 06 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Judiciary Policy Research Medical Discrimination
  1. Justice Jackson's statements about segregation and survival rates of Black newborns were not strongly supported by a 2020 study.
  2. The exclusion of important fixed effects in studies can lead to incorrect or misleading conclusions.
  3. The issue of missing fixed effects is common in research and can impact policy decisions and research priorities.

All governments are based on violence but democracy brings that violence under the control of the people

Demodexio • 132 implied HN points • 23 Jan 24
🌍 World Politics Democracy Violence Dictatorship Judiciary
  1. All governments are based on violence, but democracy puts that violence under the control of the people.
  2. Liberal democracy adds extra checks to protect unpopular minorities from the majority's control of violence.
  3. Even in a democracy, the government's foundation is the threat of violence, although it's managed by laws and oversight for social benefit.

Trump in the Dock

OLD GOATS with Jonathan Alter • 805 implied HN points • 15 Jun 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal issues Media influence Political Campaigns Judiciary
  1. Fewer people protested than expected at Trump's arraignment, potentially due to deterrence from aggressive prosecution of insurrectionists.
  2. Trump's dwindling support is reflected in his fundraising challenges, which could impact his future campaigns.
  3. Judge Cannon's actions in the Mar-a-Lago documents trial could significantly influence the outcome, with potential for a change in venue.

Neo-Majorityism

Demodexio • 132 implied HN points • 21 Dec 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Government Democracy Constitution Judiciary Legislature
  1. Avoid empowering short-term majorities through direct referendums or short terms-in-office for legislators.
  2. Current legal systems can easily disrupt the will of the majority, making governing slow and rigid.
  3. There is a potential for a more direct rule by the majority with less interference from courts, but it should be a majority built over time, not from a single election.

The Full Audio Recording Of Judge Kyle Duncan At Stanford Law

Original Jurisdiction • 668 implied HN points • 15 Mar 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal issues Free speech Protests Judiciary Controversy
  1. Debate about Judge Duncan's appearance at Stanford Law and the disruption he faced from protestors.
  2. The audio recording captures Judge Duncan's interactions with students, criticisms, and responses to questions.
  3. The event ends with Judge Duncan thanking the Federalist Society and making a closing remark to the audience.

The Supreme Court just rejected Donziger's appeal. What's next?

Krystal Kyle & Friends • 648 implied HN points • 29 Mar 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Judiciary Environment
  1. Liberal Supreme Court justices rejected Steven Donziger's appeal related to a case against Chevron.
  2. Conservative justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh dissented explaining that the district court overstepped their authority.
  3. A discussion will be held with Steven Donziger to explore the injustice as perceived by the liberal justices.

The Law Clerk Boycott Hits Stanford Law School

Original Jurisdiction • 471 implied HN points • 04 Apr 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Education Protest Free speech Judiciary
  1. Federal appellate judges are boycotting Stanford Law School for clerk hiring due to recent disruptive events involving Judge Kyle Duncan.
  2. The boycott is part of a larger pattern of judges withholding clerkship opportunities from law schools due to concerns over free speech issues.
  3. The boycotting judges are advocating for changes in law schools to promote intellectual and ideological diversity as a condition to end the boycott.

Mifepristone ruling is classic anti-science strategy

Science Forever • 278 implied HN points • 13 Apr 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Abortion Science Policy Judiciary Conservatism
  1. Conservatives often create confusion about science to avoid debating real issues, a strategy seen in various historical and political contexts.
  2. The recent mifepristone ruling in Texas reflects the attempt to cast doubt on scientific evidence by individuals without the necessary qualifications, which could have significant consequences for public health policies and the credibility of regulatory agencies like the FDA.
  3. The ruling not only poses a threat to abortion access but also carries broader implications by potentially undermining the FDA's authority and the trust in established medical science.

Everyone Drop What You're Doing and Acknowledge How Right I Was About the Trump 14th Amendment Case

I Might Be Wrong • 5 implied HN points • 04 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Supreme Court Judiciary Election Bipartisan
  1. The Supreme Court navigated a complex legal situation regarding the Trump 14th Amendment case, ultimately preserving his spot on the ballot.
  2. The conservative justices utilized Section 5 of the 14th Amendment to achieve the desired outcome while staying within the text.
  3. The liberal justices, with Amy Coney Barrett, argued against interpretations that could undermine federal power outlined in the 14th Amendment.

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Rails Against Covid Mandates

Injecting Freedom • 66 implied HN points • 29 May 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Government Civil Liberties Judiciary Legislation
  1. U.S. Supreme Court Justice expressed concern about the erosion of civil liberties during Covid mandates.
  2. Executive officials issued emergency decrees with limited legislative oversight, impacting various aspects of society.
  3. The concentration of power in the hands of a few, especially during emergencies, can lead to unintended consequences and threaten democracy.