The hottest Supreme Court Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics

The State of the Union, and the shape of the Presidential race

The Future, Now and Then • 110 implied HN points • 08 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. Biden's State of the Union speech signaled his reelection message and the upcoming Presidential race is expected to be extremely close.
  2. Biden effectively contrasted his record with Trump's, using past actions to his advantage.
  3. Media coverage may continue to focus on Biden's age, but the expectations set for him allow him to surpass them, while Trump's campaign quality may work to Biden's benefit due to Trump's past incompetence.

Trump v. Anderson

Thinking about... • 114 implied HN points • 08 Feb 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. The post discusses Trump's disqualification from office under Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  2. Timothy Snyder provides eight essays on the topic on Substack.
  3. Key resources mentioned in the post include articles, briefs, and oral arguments related to Trump v. Anderson.

How Totalitarians Speak

From the New World • 172 implied HN points • 05 Jul 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. Many totalitarians misuse terms like 'democracy' to promote their authoritarian regimes.
  2. Regime media often focuses on fashion and distraction, avoiding real discussions about government actions.
  3. Regime journalists tend to amplify extreme viewpoints and neglect the true sentiments of the general public.

The Supreme Court ends Affirmative Action

The Reactionary • 157 implied HN points • 29 Jun 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. The Supreme Court has ended Affirmative Action in college admissions due to violations of the Equal Protection Clause.
  2. Justice Roberts argued that the purported benefits of affirmative action were vague and not sufficiently coherent.
  3. Colleges can still consider an applicant's discussion of how race affected their life, but not use it to circumvent the ban on race-based admissions.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

URGENT: The Supreme Court rules 9-0 that states must allow Donald Trump on the presidential ballot

Unreported Truths • 74 implied HN points • 04 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. The Supreme Court ruled unanimously, 9-0, that states must allow Donald Trump on the presidential ballot.
  2. States cannot disqualify candidates for federal office as insurrectionists, according to the Supreme Court decision.
  3. The unanimous decision was a rebuke to leftist lawyers who argued for disqualifying Trump, emphasizing that voters deserve the final say.

How Berenson v Biden has been caught up in two big Supreme Court cases over government efforts to control free speech

Unreported Truths • 47 implied HN points • 13 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. The Supreme Court is involved in important cases regarding government control of free speech.
  2. Berenson v Biden lawsuit focuses on censorship, involves multiple defendants, and can proceed independently of the Missouri case.
  3. Additional free speech case before the Supreme Court involves the NRA and New York state's actions against the organization.

The Republican War on American Citizenship

Unpopular Front • 58 implied HN points • 27 Jun 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. The Republican party is conducting a sustained attack on the citizenship rights of certain Americans.
  2. There is a historical struggle over the concept of citizenship and who gets to be considered a citizen in America.
  3. The erosion of birthright citizenship is a real concern and has significant implications for the political landscape.

9-0

Gideon's Substack • 23 implied HN points • 04 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. The Supreme Court unanimously decided that Colorado cannot remove former president Donald Trump from the state's primary ballot under the 14th Amendment.
  2. A 5-4 majority ruled that only Congress can lay the groundwork for applying constitutional provisions to individuals running for office, emphasizing democratic legitimacy.
  3. The decision highlights the importance of democratic accountability and the need for consistency in the Court's rulings to maintain legitimacy and protect American democracy.

POTUS, SCOTUS, and the Danger of Normalcy Bias

JoeWrote • 20 implied HN points • 12 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. The Republican Party is not normal, and it's crucial to stop pretending that it is.
  2. Normalcy Bias is a significant societal issue, leading to a lack of action in recognizing and addressing threats, particularly from the Republican Party.
  3. The GOP has never been a 'normal' party, historically filled with fascism, racism, and a desire for Christian theocracy, and it's unlikely to change even with shifts in leadership.

💺First Class Rights

UnfairNation by Ehsan Zaffar • 3 implied HN points • 01 Jul 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. Legal protections may now vary based on where you live and your financial ability to hire a lawyer, making them less accessible for many people.
  2. Changes in government policies can create lasting issues that are hard to fix even if they are later ruled unconstitutional.
  3. The recent Supreme Court ruling makes constitutional rights seem more like a privilege that only some can afford, rather than something that protects everyone equally.

March 6, 2024

Letters from an American • 12 implied HN points • 07 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. In the 1960s, Black organizers in Selma, Alabama, led efforts to register Black voters, supported by civil rights organizations like the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee.
  2. The violent events of Bloody Sunday, including the attack on peaceful marchers by law enforcement, played a significant role in gaining national attention and governmental action towards passing the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
  3. Continued challenges to voting rights since the Shelby County v. Holder decision in 2013 have led to the reemergence of voter suppression tactics, underscoring the ongoing importance of protecting and advancing voting rights legislation.

ketanji brown and the template of doom

bad cattitude • 10 implied HN points • 19 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. Ensuring freedom of speech is crucial in the modern public square - without it, we risk losing our rights and becoming subject to censorship by the government or other entities.
  2. The First Amendment is designed to protect people from the government and any attempt to suppress speech by those in power should be questioned and challenged.
  3. Censorship inhibits meaningful discourse and the search for truth - the remedy for wrong speech is more speech, not silencing differing opinions.

February 12, 2024

Letters from an American • 11 implied HN points • 13 Feb 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. Trump's statements regarding NATO and Russia have been met with strong opposition from both Democrats and Republicans, with concerns about potential consequences for national security.
  2. NATO is an alliance designed for collective defense where each member agrees to aid one another if attacked, based on the principle that an attack on one is an attack on all.
  3. There is ongoing bipartisan support in Congress for aid to Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, despite opposition from Trump-aligned Republicans.

March 4, 2024

Letters from an American • 10 implied HN points • 05 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. The Supreme Court ruled that states cannot remove Donald Trump from the 2024 presidential ballot, leading to a unanimous decision.
  2. The court avoided defining the events of January 6, 2021, as an insurrection and went beyond the necessary scope in their ruling.
  3. The court's decision hinted at a larger issue where courts are involving themselves in lawmaking rather than just judicial review.

March 3, 2024

Letters from an American • 9 implied HN points • 04 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. Vice President Kamala Harris is pushing for a ceasefire in the Middle East, putting forward a six-week deal that Israel has reportedly accepted, waiting on Hamas' response.
  2. Former SC governor Nikki Haley won a Republican primary, showing soft support for Trump, who has upcoming financial and legal challenges.
  3. Super Tuesday could solidify Trump's Republican nomination while he faces financial obligations, with the Republican Party potentially facing a dilemma as Trump gains control amidst legal problems.

Everyone Drop What You're Doing and Acknowledge How Right I Was About the Trump 14th Amendment Case

I Might Be Wrong • 5 implied HN points • 04 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. The Supreme Court navigated a complex legal situation regarding the Trump 14th Amendment case, ultimately preserving his spot on the ballot.
  2. The conservative justices utilized Section 5 of the 14th Amendment to achieve the desired outcome while staying within the text.
  3. The liberal justices, with Amy Coney Barrett, argued against interpretations that could undermine federal power outlined in the 14th Amendment.

Watch the live free speech broadcast starting Monday March 18 at 9am EST

Steve Kirsch's newsletter • 3 implied HN points • 18 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. The US Supreme Court will hear a critical free speech case regarding government pressure on social media companies to censor content.
  2. There will be a live rally in front of the Supreme Court to advocate for free speech.
  3. The event will be covered by news outlets like The Highwire and The Epoch Times, and you can listen to the Supreme Court arguments live online.

Good Job Supreme Court

startupdreams • 0 implied HN points • 05 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. The US Supreme Court ruled that Colorado cannot use the 14th Amendment to remove a candidate from the Presidential ballots, highlighting the importance of federal power over state powers.
  2. The unanimous decision of the Supreme Court showcases their commitment to interpreting the law based on the Constitution and not succumbing to political pressures or biases.
  3. The decision allows for potential Congressional actions regarding candidate disqualification, with implications on the certification of future election results in case of alleged insurrection.

Republican Governor Latest to Encourage Texas To Ignore US Supreme Court Ruling

The Washington Current • 0 implied HN points • 26 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. Multiple Republican politicians are encouraging Texas to ignore a US Supreme Court ruling.
  2. The Supreme Court decision allowed the federal government to remove razor wire placed by Texas law enforcement on the border wall.
  3. There is potential for President Biden to federalize the National Guard in Texas to enforce the court's ruling, leading to significant tension.

The Colorado Decision

Innovation Nation • 0 implied HN points • 20 Dec 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. The Colorado decision to remove Trump from 2024 ballots may not have significant consequences.
  2. If Trump appeals, he will likely still appear on both the primary and general ballots.
  3. The decision seems more about grabbing headlines than making a substantial impact.

Heading towards a confrontation?

omar’s Newsletter • 0 implied HN points • 14 May 23
🌍 World Politics Supreme Court
  1. Two main parties in Pakistan are calling for protests outside the Supreme Court, leading to political tensions escalating.
  2. The Supreme Court in Pakistan is seen as favoring the current government, causing internal divisions and calls for change.
  3. Former Prime Minister Imran Khan is continuing verbal assaults on military officers, indicating a volatile political situation.

On Presidential Immunity

startupdreams • 0 implied HN points • 09 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. Presidents have historically been assumed to have immunity from prosecution for actions taken while in office.
  2. The ongoing case regarding Trump's immunity has far-reaching implications beyond just his own cases.
  3. The ultimate decision on Presidential immunity will likely be made by the Supreme Court in a landmark case.

Matt's Five Points, October 19, 2018 — Constitutional Hardball

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 19 Oct 18
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. Constitutional hardball is when legal political strategies push the boundaries of accepted norms. It can be risky, as it may lead to larger conflicts and weaken institutions like the Supreme Court.
  2. The statehood process in the U.S. is easy to manipulate and can disrupt political balance. This flexibility once caused major tensions, particularly regarding issues like slavery in the 19th century.
  3. Lame-duck sessions in Congress can actually be quite productive, with significant legislation often passing during this time. The upcoming session could see important decisions being made, especially if party control changes.

FIVE POINTS: The Kavanaugh Circus was Democracy in Action

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 11 Oct 18
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. The Kavanaugh confirmation process showed how democracy works, with politicians and the public engaging in debates about policy. It was messy but that's a normal part of politics.
  2. Polling opinions on issues don't always predict how people will vote. It's more about how those views impact the political behavior of voters, which can be complex.
  3. In elections, the dynamics between the House and Senate can differ greatly. Different strategies work for each, and national issues can sometimes hurt certain candidates more than help them.

The SCOTUS Nomination, Senate Procedure, and Democratic Strategy

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 28 Jun 18
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. Democrats can't block a Supreme Court nominee like Republicans did with Garland because they don't have a majority in the Senate. This means they can't stop the nomination process directly.
  2. If Democrats want to slow down the Senate's work to increase the costs of a nomination, they would need to use complicated strategies like dragging out debates or refusing to agree on routine procedures. However, this is likely to backfire politically.
  3. Since they probably can't stop the nomination, Democrats will likely focus on shaping public opinion and preparing for future elections rather than trying to defeat the nominee outright.

Supreme Court Justice Venn Diagaram #2: John Roberts

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 30 Mar 12
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. John Roberts is the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. He plays a big role in deciding important cases.
  2. Understanding how Roberts makes decisions can help us see how the Supreme Court works. His choices can have a major impact on laws and rights.
  3. Venn diagrams can help simplify complex relationships in the court. They show how justices might agree or disagree on different issues.

Supreme Court Justice Venn Diagram #1: Clarence Thomas

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 29 Mar 12
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. The Supreme Court has important roles that can impact laws in the country. It's crucial to understand the influence of each Justice.
  2. Clarence Thomas is one of the Justices, and his opinions are often unique and significant. Learning about his views can help people understand court decisions better.
  3. Using tools like Venn diagrams can help visualize complex relationships between ideas, especially in law and politics. They make it easier to grasp how different concepts connect.

At the corner of East Capitol and 1st Street NW

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 26 Mar 12
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. Protests in front of the Supreme Court can feel underwhelming. Many times, there are not enough demonstrators, and the scene can be pretty calm and quiet.
  2. Protesting at the Court is a bit strange because the Court doesn't really listen to public opinion like Congress does. Most protesters seem to be trying to get media attention rather than influence the justices directly.
  3. The layout of the Supreme Court plaza is great for protests, but people can't use it because of rules. Instead, protests end up on the sidewalk, making them less impactful than they could be.

Housing Is Scarce Because Property Rights Are Weak

Cornerstone • 0 implied HN points • 08 Dec 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court
  1. Housing scarcity can be linked to weak property rights, like the Supreme Court decision on zoning.
  2. The Supreme Court decision in 1926 upheld single-family zoning, prioritizing certain privileges for exclusive neighborhoods.
  3. The opinion reflected class prejudice and focused on spurious arguments about traffic, still relevant in housing advocacy today.