The hottest Supreme Court Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics

Commentator

Castalia • 159 implied HN points • 26 Jun 22
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court Abortion rights Political Debate Social justice Foreign Policy
  1. The Dobbs ruling changes the political landscape around abortion, leading to more intense debates and potential loss of legal rights for women. It suggests we may see chaotic battles over reproductive rights in the coming years.
  2. The #MeToo movement is evolving, with a growing concern over 'cancel culture' in schools. Young people are being harshly judged, and the social media backlash can lead to extreme consequences for minor mistakes.
  3. Climate reparations raise complex questions about responsibility for global warming. It's tricky to determine who should pay, but the debate is getting more attention as a response to environmental damage and historical injustices.

‘The Original Intent of the Founders Is Very Clear’: Trump Should Be Kept off 2024 Ballot

The Washington Current • 19 implied HN points • 05 Feb 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Election Supreme Court Insurrection Constitution
  1. The Supreme Court will hear arguments on whether Donald Trump should be kept off the 2024 ballot due to his involvement in the Jan. 6 attacks.
  2. The 14th Amendment can disqualify someone from holding public office for engaging in insurrection against the federal government.
  3. Legal experts argue that Donald Trump should be disqualified from running for office based on the original intent of the founders and his actions.

Single Point of Failure

The Radar • 19 implied HN points • 23 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court Electoral process Norms
  1. In the US presidential election system, a loophole exists that could result in a legally stolen election, if not addressed
  2. The system relies on electors to cast their votes based on the popular vote in their state, but sometimes electors break their pledges, creating vulnerabilities
  3. The Supreme Court has highlighted the potential vulnerability in the system where state legislatures could manipulate electors' votes, circumventing the will of the people

Title 42, or when the only winning move is not to play

Adam's Legal Newsletter • 59 implied HN points • 04 Feb 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Immigration Legal system Political Dynamics Supreme Court
  1. Title 42 order, implemented during Covid, had legal challenges and was stayed by the Supreme Court - showing complexities in administrative law litigation.
  2. Legal cases involving political parties defending laws passed by the other party often lead to strategic maneuvers and Supreme Court interventions.
  3. Supreme Court decisions, like granting certiorari or stays, are highly discretionary and influenced by philosophical viewpoints, not clear legal rules.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

How Berenson v Biden has been caught up in two big Supreme Court cases over government efforts to control free speech

Unreported Truths • 47 implied HN points • 13 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Free speech Supreme Court Lawsuit First Amendment
  1. The Supreme Court is involved in important cases regarding government control of free speech.
  2. Berenson v Biden lawsuit focuses on censorship, involves multiple defendants, and can proceed independently of the Missouri case.
  3. Additional free speech case before the Supreme Court involves the NRA and New York state's actions against the organization.

The Republican War on American Citizenship

Unpopular Front • 58 implied HN points • 27 Jun 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Citizenship Republican Election Supreme Court Policy
  1. The Republican party is conducting a sustained attack on the citizenship rights of certain Americans.
  2. There is a historical struggle over the concept of citizenship and who gets to be considered a citizen in America.
  3. The erosion of birthright citizenship is a real concern and has significant implications for the political landscape.

9-0

Gideon's Substack • 23 implied HN points • 04 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court Court rulings Election
  1. The Supreme Court unanimously decided that Colorado cannot remove former president Donald Trump from the state's primary ballot under the 14th Amendment.
  2. A 5-4 majority ruled that only Congress can lay the groundwork for applying constitutional provisions to individuals running for office, emphasizing democratic legitimacy.
  3. The decision highlights the importance of democratic accountability and the need for consistency in the Court's rulings to maintain legitimacy and protect American democracy.

POTUS, SCOTUS, and the Danger of Normalcy Bias

JoeWrote • 20 implied HN points • 12 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Democracy Supreme Court Political Bias Political parties Presidential elections
  1. The Republican Party is not normal, and it's crucial to stop pretending that it is.
  2. Normalcy Bias is a significant societal issue, leading to a lack of action in recognizing and addressing threats, particularly from the Republican Party.
  3. The GOP has never been a 'normal' party, historically filled with fascism, racism, and a desire for Christian theocracy, and it's unlikely to change even with shifts in leadership.

March 6, 2024

Letters from an American • 12 implied HN points • 07 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Voting Rights Civil Rights Movement Legislation Supreme Court Government
  1. In the 1960s, Black organizers in Selma, Alabama, led efforts to register Black voters, supported by civil rights organizations like the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee.
  2. The violent events of Bloody Sunday, including the attack on peaceful marchers by law enforcement, played a significant role in gaining national attention and governmental action towards passing the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
  3. Continued challenges to voting rights since the Shelby County v. Holder decision in 2013 have led to the reemergence of voter suppression tactics, underscoring the ongoing importance of protecting and advancing voting rights legislation.

ketanji brown and the template of doom

bad cattitude • 10 implied HN points • 19 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Free speech Censorship Government Power First Amendment Supreme Court
  1. Ensuring freedom of speech is crucial in the modern public square - without it, we risk losing our rights and becoming subject to censorship by the government or other entities.
  2. The First Amendment is designed to protect people from the government and any attempt to suppress speech by those in power should be questioned and challenged.
  3. Censorship inhibits meaningful discourse and the search for truth - the remedy for wrong speech is more speech, not silencing differing opinions.

March 4, 2024

Letters from an American • 10 implied HN points • 05 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court Congress
  1. The Supreme Court ruled that states cannot remove Donald Trump from the 2024 presidential ballot, leading to a unanimous decision.
  2. The court avoided defining the events of January 6, 2021, as an insurrection and went beyond the necessary scope in their ruling.
  3. The court's decision hinted at a larger issue where courts are involving themselves in lawmaking rather than just judicial review.

February 12, 2024

Letters from an American • 11 implied HN points • 13 Feb 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics NATO National Security Foreign Aid Supreme Court Republican party
  1. Trump's statements regarding NATO and Russia have been met with strong opposition from both Democrats and Republicans, with concerns about potential consequences for national security.
  2. NATO is an alliance designed for collective defense where each member agrees to aid one another if attacked, based on the principle that an attack on one is an attack on all.
  3. There is ongoing bipartisan support in Congress for aid to Ukraine, Israel, and Taiwan, despite opposition from Trump-aligned Republicans.

March 3, 2024

Letters from an American • 9 implied HN points • 04 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court Republican party Elections
  1. Vice President Kamala Harris is pushing for a ceasefire in the Middle East, putting forward a six-week deal that Israel has reportedly accepted, waiting on Hamas' response.
  2. Former SC governor Nikki Haley won a Republican primary, showing soft support for Trump, who has upcoming financial and legal challenges.
  3. Super Tuesday could solidify Trump's Republican nomination while he faces financial obligations, with the Republican Party potentially facing a dilemma as Trump gains control amidst legal problems.

Everyone Drop What You're Doing and Acknowledge How Right I Was About the Trump 14th Amendment Case

I Might Be Wrong • 5 implied HN points • 04 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal Supreme Court Judiciary Election Bipartisan
  1. The Supreme Court navigated a complex legal situation regarding the Trump 14th Amendment case, ultimately preserving his spot on the ballot.
  2. The conservative justices utilized Section 5 of the 14th Amendment to achieve the desired outcome while staying within the text.
  3. The liberal justices, with Amy Coney Barrett, argued against interpretations that could undermine federal power outlined in the 14th Amendment.

Affirmative Action Is Dead. That's A Good Thing

Stove Top • 5 HN points • 01 Jul 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Affirmative Action Supreme Court College Admissions Identity politics Education reform
  1. Affirmative action has been abolished, which some view as a positive change.
  2. The demographics of the country have changed since affirmative action began, making it a challenge to implement fairly.
  3. An alternative to affirmative action could be focusing on class-based admissions to address inequalities in college admissions.

Watch the live free speech broadcast starting Monday March 18 at 9am EST

Steve Kirsch's newsletter • 3 implied HN points • 18 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Free speech Supreme Court Censorship
  1. The US Supreme Court will hear a critical free speech case regarding government pressure on social media companies to censor content.
  2. There will be a live rally in front of the Supreme Court to advocate for free speech.
  3. The event will be covered by news outlets like The Highwire and The Epoch Times, and you can listen to the Supreme Court arguments live online.

POLITICAL PERSPECTIVE: Worried Trump Could Return as President? The Nation Might Not Last Until the Election

The Washington Current • 0 implied HN points • 28 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Election Supreme Court Republican party Civil War Political violence
  1. Concerns about Trump potentially returning as President are growing.
  2. Republicans advocating defiance of Supreme Court rulings are seen as a threat to national unity.
  3. There is fear that this political turmoil could escalate to violent conflict before the November election.

Housing Is Scarce Because Property Rights Are Weak

Cornerstone • 0 implied HN points • 08 Dec 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Housing Property Rights Supreme Court Zoning Affordability
  1. Housing scarcity can be linked to weak property rights, like the Supreme Court decision on zoning.
  2. The Supreme Court decision in 1926 upheld single-family zoning, prioritizing certain privileges for exclusive neighborhoods.
  3. The opinion reflected class prejudice and focused on spurious arguments about traffic, still relevant in housing advocacy today.

Tối cao Pháp viện có quyết định kết quả bầu cử?

Thái | Hacker | Kỹ sư tin tặc • 0 implied HN points • 12 Nov 20
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Election Supreme Court Political parties Voting Rights
  1. The Supreme Court decision regarding the election lawsuit will not change the election results.
  2. Trump's lawsuit in Pennsylvania challenges election laws, not voter fraud claims.
  3. The Supreme Court ruling will clarify who has the authority to decide election laws, not impact the election outcome.

Matt's Five Points, October 19, 2018 — Constitutional Hardball

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 19 Oct 18
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Constitutional Law Legislative Process Supreme Court Political Tactics
  1. Constitutional hardball is when legal political strategies push the boundaries of accepted norms. It can be risky, as it may lead to larger conflicts and weaken institutions like the Supreme Court.
  2. The statehood process in the U.S. is easy to manipulate and can disrupt political balance. This flexibility once caused major tensions, particularly regarding issues like slavery in the 19th century.
  3. Lame-duck sessions in Congress can actually be quite productive, with significant legislation often passing during this time. The upcoming session could see important decisions being made, especially if party control changes.

FIVE POINTS: The Kavanaugh Circus was Democracy in Action

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 11 Oct 18
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Supreme Court Political parties Public Opinion Government Structure
  1. The Kavanaugh confirmation process showed how democracy works, with politicians and the public engaging in debates about policy. It was messy but that's a normal part of politics.
  2. Polling opinions on issues don't always predict how people will vote. It's more about how those views impact the political behavior of voters, which can be complex.
  3. In elections, the dynamics between the House and Senate can differ greatly. Different strategies work for each, and national issues can sometimes hurt certain candidates more than help them.

The SCOTUS Nomination, Senate Procedure, and Democratic Strategy

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 28 Jun 18
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court Senate Legislation Political strategy Public Opinion
  1. Democrats can't block a Supreme Court nominee like Republicans did with Garland because they don't have a majority in the Senate. This means they can't stop the nomination process directly.
  2. If Democrats want to slow down the Senate's work to increase the costs of a nomination, they would need to use complicated strategies like dragging out debates or refusing to agree on routine procedures. However, this is likely to backfire politically.
  3. Since they probably can't stop the nomination, Democrats will likely focus on shaping public opinion and preparing for future elections rather than trying to defeat the nominee outright.

Supreme Court Justice Venn Diagaram #2: John Roberts

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 30 Mar 12
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court Judiciary Political Figures Legal analysis Government
  1. John Roberts is the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. He plays a big role in deciding important cases.
  2. Understanding how Roberts makes decisions can help us see how the Supreme Court works. His choices can have a major impact on laws and rights.
  3. Venn diagrams can help simplify complex relationships in the court. They show how justices might agree or disagree on different issues.

Supreme Court Justice Venn Diagram #1: Clarence Thomas

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 29 Mar 12
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Judiciary Supreme Court Political Analysis Government
  1. The Supreme Court has important roles that can impact laws in the country. It's crucial to understand the influence of each Justice.
  2. Clarence Thomas is one of the Justices, and his opinions are often unique and significant. Learning about his views can help people understand court decisions better.
  3. Using tools like Venn diagrams can help visualize complex relationships between ideas, especially in law and politics. They make it easier to grasp how different concepts connect.

At the corner of East Capitol and 1st Street NW

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 26 Mar 12
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Protests Supreme Court Civil Rights Media influence Public Opinion
  1. Protests in front of the Supreme Court can feel underwhelming. Many times, there are not enough demonstrators, and the scene can be pretty calm and quiet.
  2. Protesting at the Court is a bit strange because the Court doesn't really listen to public opinion like Congress does. Most protesters seem to be trying to get media attention rather than influence the justices directly.
  3. The layout of the Supreme Court plaza is great for protests, but people can't use it because of rules. Instead, protests end up on the sidewalk, making them less impactful than they could be.

Supreme Court Justice Venn Diagram #3: Antonin Scalia

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 04 Apr 10
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Supreme Court Judicial system Legal analysis Political Commentary Government
  1. The Supreme Court has different justices with unique views. It's important to understand these perspectives to know how they influence decisions.
  2. Antonin Scalia was known for his originalist interpretation of the Constitution. He believed in sticking closely to the text as it was originally written.
  3. Visual tools like Venn diagrams can help us compare and contrast the views of different justices in a simple way. This makes complex ideas easier to understand.

Maine Secy. Of State on 14th Amendment: ‘I Followed the Law And the Constitution as Is My Duty’

The Washington Current • 0 implied HN points • 08 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Government Presidential Election Constitution Supreme Court
  1. Maine Secy. of State barred Trump from state ballot due to his involvement in Jan. 6 insurrection
  2. She followed Section 3 of the 14th Amendment which bars those involved in insurrection from public office
  3. Decision is subject to appeal in superior court and potentially the US Supreme Court

Heading towards a confrontation?

omar’s Newsletter • 0 implied HN points • 14 May 23
🌍 World Politics Political Tensions Protests Supreme Court Military
  1. Two main parties in Pakistan are calling for protests outside the Supreme Court, leading to political tensions escalating.
  2. The Supreme Court in Pakistan is seen as favoring the current government, causing internal divisions and calls for change.
  3. Former Prime Minister Imran Khan is continuing verbal assaults on military officers, indicating a volatile political situation.

Good Job Supreme Court

startupdreams • 0 implied HN points • 05 Mar 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal analysis Supreme Court 14th Amendment Congress Elections
  1. The US Supreme Court ruled that Colorado cannot use the 14th Amendment to remove a candidate from the Presidential ballots, highlighting the importance of federal power over state powers.
  2. The unanimous decision of the Supreme Court showcases their commitment to interpreting the law based on the Constitution and not succumbing to political pressures or biases.
  3. The decision allows for potential Congressional actions regarding candidate disqualification, with implications on the certification of future election results in case of alleged insurrection.

Republican Governor Latest to Encourage Texas To Ignore US Supreme Court Ruling

The Washington Current • 0 implied HN points • 26 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Governors Supreme Court National Guard Border Security Federal Government
  1. Multiple Republican politicians are encouraging Texas to ignore a US Supreme Court ruling.
  2. The Supreme Court decision allowed the federal government to remove razor wire placed by Texas law enforcement on the border wall.
  3. There is potential for President Biden to federalize the National Guard in Texas to enforce the court's ruling, leading to significant tension.