Chartbook β’ 1959 implied HN points β’ 20 Jan 26
- There are two main readings of Davos 2026: some say it has become irrelevant and impotent, while others see a revival driven by Larry Fink and a strong turnout of global leaders and CEOs.
- Davos might matter less because of design and more because of timing β it can serve as a useful neutral venue for urgent talks, for example on the Greenland crisis between the US and Europe.
- The core question is whether global business and finance can form a real counterweight to disruptive MAGA-era policies; firms want stability but their retreat from commitments like ESG makes collective action uncertain.