The hottest Race Issues Substack posts right now

The American Psychological Association apologized for its past role in racism, highlighting the need for change in the field. Psychologists must acknowledge history while moving forward to support all communities.
A detailed critique of clinical psychology accused it of harboring racism and called for an anti-racist approach. The authors believe that psychology must evolve to be more inclusive and fair.
The response to the critique showed mixed feelings, with some supporting it and others opposing it. This indicates a deep divide in psychology on how to address racism and maintain scientific integrity.

The government has been categorizing people into limited racial groups since 1977, which critics argue is outdated and arbitrary.
Changes to these categories are coming, with the 2030 census set to have seven defined races instead of five, but these classifications are still seen as confusing and nonsensical.
Some people believe that instead of having these set racial categories, the concept of race should be completely abolished in government practices.

There are cases of people fabricating hate messages and blaming them on others, raising questions about honesty in discussions on race.
A report on black Americans' feelings about race has been revised after complaints, highlighting how data can be influenced by outside opinions.
Some groups are pushing to change traditional language and address controversial topics, like gender and parenting, in unexpected ways.

Anti-white bigotry exists and needs to be recognized. It's important to acknowledge that not everyone experiences the same treatment based on their race.
Many white people feel a sense of fear or shame about discussing their experiences. This reluctance could lead to negative consequences if not addressed.
There's a call to action for white individuals to express their concerns and experiences more openly. It’s vital for everyone to feel safe and heard, regardless of their background.

People can experience discrimination even if it happens very rarely. For example, studies show that something like 36% more callbacks were given to White job applicants compared to Black ones, even though only a small number of actual discriminatory acts occurred.
There are different ways to look at discrimination: one way focuses on how often discrimination happens in actions, and another looks at the overall impact on people's experiences. This can make it seem like there are contradictions in findings about discrimination.
Small amounts of discrimination can still have a big effect, especially in competitive situations. Even if discrimination happens infrequently, it can lead to significant problems for those affected, such as fewer job opportunities.

Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

Critics of microaggression research often face accusations of racism, which can stifle scientific discussion. It's important for science to allow critical evaluation without labeling dissenters negatively.
Many claims about microaggressions lack strong scientific backing. Researchers have not effectively shown that microaggressions are widespread, harmful, or caused by racism.
The current approach to discussing microaggressions may threaten free speech and genuine academic inquiry. It's essential to keep an open mind and question research claims for a healthy scientific environment.

Some discussions on racism have expanded to include seemingly innocuous items like food, drinks, and activities.
Various items such as coffee, fitness, AI, and potatoes have been linked to racism in different articles and discussions.
The all-encompassing nature of these discussions reflects an increasing awareness and sensitivity around the topic of race.

At family dinners, people often avoid talking about tough topics to keep the peace. It's common for family members to feel pressure to respond politely instead of honestly.
One person wanted to see if the family felt comfortable discussing their thoughts on race in art. This showed a desire for deeper connection and honesty among loved ones.
It's important to create a safe space where family can share their true feelings, even if those feelings are uncomfortable. Trust and openness can help strengthen family bonds.

The book 'When Race Trumps Merit' by Heather MacDonald discusses how feelings about race impact various aspects of society. It argues that these emotions are hurting our institutions and relationships.
MacDonald points out that classical music is currently facing challenges because of politically charged decisions. Some believe they need to change the way they operate to survive.
The issues raised in the book extend beyond music to areas like medicine and science, showing how extreme views can disrupt many important fields. It's an eye-opening look at a serious problem.

Slogans can be easily misunderstood, so they need to have clear explanations and context when introduced. It's important to communicate what a slogan really means to avoid confusion.
Both sides can use catchy slogans, but some may not align with classic liberal values of judging individuals fairly. It's essential to think about how to respond thoughtfully instead of just matching slogans.
Classical liberalism is all about truth and positive communication. Instead of resorting to trolling, we should focus on being persuasive and maintaining faith in our principles.