Heterodox STEM

Heterodox STEM scrutinizes the impact of ideological trends in academia, focusing on free speech, due process, and the challenges against merit-based systems. It highlights the influence of postmodernism, 'wokism', and DEI initiatives on educational standards, advocating for open debate and intellectual diversity in STEM fields.

Academic Freedom Ideological Trends in Education Merit and Diversity in Academia Free Speech on Campus Intellectual Diversity Critique of Postmodernism and Wokism

The hottest Substack posts of Heterodox STEM

And their main takeaways
106 implied HN points 02 Jul 25
  1. Pride events have changed a lot over the years, leading to confusion and mixed feelings within the LGBTQ+ community. Many feel that the original purpose of celebrating gay rights has been lost among various new movements.
  2. There is a growing concern about how young people are introduced to complex topics like gender identity. Some believe these discussions may distract from real issues facing the gay community.
  3. Pride's popularity seems to be declining, with fewer corporate sponsors and financial difficulties. Many think it should refocus on honoring past achievements rather than expanding into new agendas.
156 implied HN points 30 Jun 25
  1. Gordon Klein is going to trial after being punished for not discriminating against students at UCLA. His case raises important questions about fairness in education.
  2. The lawsuit targets the dean personally, which could change how university leaders respond to outside pressure. It might make them think twice about taking unfair actions.
  3. If Klein wins, it could set a precedent that encourages universities to protect academic freedom and discourage bullying towards educators.
163 implied HN points 29 Jun 25
  1. Universities face challenges when students use graduation speeches to share personal political views, especially if it offends others. It's important for schools to set clear guidelines on what is appropriate for such occasions.
  2. When a student misleads the administration about their speech, it raises ethical questions and could lead to disciplinary actions. It’s crucial for students to act honorably and respect the setting they are in.
  3. Universities should not only teach academic subjects but also social manners and discourse. Teaching students how to express their opinions without offending others is an important part of their education.
277 implied HN points 18 Jun 25
  1. Universities used to focus on sharing and building upon the history and achievements of civilization, but many feel that focus is fading.
  2. Instead of respecting and learning from the past, some elite universities are now critiquing and diminishing their own historical significance.
  3. This shift in perspective could be harmful to national unity as it creates division and dissatisfaction with the foundational values of society.
142 implied HN points 22 Jun 25
  1. The lab leak theory is still debated, but political biases can influence how openly this is discussed in science.
  2. Gain-of-function research helps study viruses but poses risks, as it could lead to pandemics if not handled properly.
  3. Honest communication about scientific topics can help build public trust, which is crucial for handling future health crises.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
320 implied HN points 15 Jun 25
  1. In Canada, many professionals feel they can't speak freely because of fear of losing their jobs for holding unpopular opinions. This is harming free speech in the workplace.
  2. Merit should be the most important factor when choosing people for jobs, but many institutions are prioritizing things like race and gender instead. This shift can hurt quality and excellence.
  3. There’s a concern that political correctness is influencing professions like medicine and education. People worry that real discussions may be stifled, leading to poor decision-making.
192 implied HN points 08 Jun 25
  1. It's important for scientists to report accurate information about climate change, without exaggerating risks. This helps keep trust in science strong.
  2. Some published studies can mislead people by only showing negative aspects of climate data. A balanced view is necessary to understand the full picture.
  3. We should encourage honest and thorough research that combines both good and bad news about our world. Pursuing the truth is essential.
241 implied HN points 04 Jun 25
  1. Steven Pinker wrote an article defending Harvard, surprising many of his supporters who see him as anti-woke. It highlights both the flaws and the achievements of the university.
  2. He argues that funding for STEM research, which comes from taxpayers, is crucial and indicates that Harvard's ways may need reform to secure more support.
  3. There is a call to action for scholars to join in reform efforts to change the current direction of higher education and ensure that funding continues.
128 implied HN points 11 Jun 25
  1. Antisemitism in the US is changing, with a notable rise in left-wing and Islamist perspectives often aimed at Israel. Many incidents are now more closely linked to social justice movements rather than traditional right-wing extremism.
  2. The ADL's reports may overstate right-wing antisemitism while underreporting incidents from leftist or Islamist sources. This can distort public perception about who is actually perpetuating antisemitism today.
  3. Recent data suggests that a significant majority of antisemitic incidents are linked to leftist or Islamist narratives, especially related to Israel, challenging the belief that right-wing white supremacy is the main source of antisemitism.
249 implied HN points 16 Feb 25
  1. Discrimination in academics based on race is illegal, and institutions can lose federal funding for such practices. It is crucial for schools to treat all students equally, regardless of race.
  2. Programs that claim to be neutral might still discriminate if they are influenced by race. Institutions cannot use indirect ways to favor or disadvantage students based on their race.
  3. If you see discrimination in education, it's important to report it. You can file a complaint with the Department of Education, and there are ways to do this anonymously for safety.
206 implied HN points 23 Feb 25
  1. Academic freedom is under threat, with many professors feeling censored by current identity politics. This makes it hard for them to express differing views openly.
  2. Modern universities are focusing more on adhering to policies rather than encouraging innovation and critical thinking. This shift is harming the quality of education.
  3. There is a call for a return to objective truth and open discussions in academia. Without diverse opinions and debates, intellectual growth is stunted.
334 implied HN points 12 Jan 25
  1. Universities should promote free inquiry and have open discussions about all ideas, including Indigenous ways of knowing. Avoiding these conversations can lead to a lack of understanding and legitimate critique.
  2. If an idea cannot be tested or questioned, it cannot be considered scientific. This means that theories presented without detailed evidence fall outside of scientific discourse.
  3. The push for indigenization and decolonization in universities may replace established scientific methods with other belief systems. This could undermine the core mission of universities to pursue truth and knowledge.
234 implied HN points 09 Feb 25
  1. Bias is present in academia and is often not unconscious. Many feel that men struggle to gain recognition in this environment.
  2. Data suggests that award processes in universities may not truly reflect merit and can be influenced by gender and diversity initiatives.
  3. The academic focus on diversity and inclusion sometimes leads to a lack of male representation in awards, raising questions about the fairness of these systems.
249 implied HN points 26 Jan 25
  1. The National Science Foundation's GOLD program was created to boost diversity in geosciences but has faced criticism for possibly promoting discrimination instead of true inclusion.
  2. There have been incidents where events limited participation based on race, raising legal concerns about civil rights violations under federal law.
  3. Many diversity initiatives funded by the government need better oversight to ensure they don't violate civil rights, and it’s important for people to report any discrimination they encounter.
170 implied HN points 16 Feb 25
  1. The American Psychological Association apologized for its past role in racism, highlighting the need for change in the field. Psychologists must acknowledge history while moving forward to support all communities.
  2. A detailed critique of clinical psychology accused it of harboring racism and called for an anti-racist approach. The authors believe that psychology must evolve to be more inclusive and fair.
  3. The response to the critique showed mixed feelings, with some supporting it and others opposing it. This indicates a deep divide in psychology on how to address racism and maintain scientific integrity.
156 implied HN points 21 Feb 25
  1. Some biology societies have stated that sex is not simply male or female, which has caused confusion.
  2. A group of biologists has written a letter saying that sex should actually be defined by gamete type, meaning there are two sexes.
  3. They are asking other biologists to sign this letter to support their view and clarify the definition of sex.
355 implied HN points 01 Dec 24
  1. The NSF should refocus on funding high-quality scientific research based solely on merit rather than identity politics.
  2. Key reforms include changing their vision and core values to prioritize excellence in science.
  3. Unnecessary offices and initiatives that do not contribute to scientific advancement should be eliminated to streamline the NSF's efforts.
1579 implied HN points 13 Dec 23
  1. Harvard's president was accused of plagiarism but faced no consequences, leading to concerns about double standards.
  2. Students at Harvard face severe punishments for plagiarism, while the university seems to handle allegations against its president differently.
  3. The president's controversies have raised questions about the institution's values and reputation, affecting its students and donors.
106 implied HN points 25 Feb 25
  1. There is a debate about whether someone like Elon Musk should be kept as a Fellow of the Royal Society due to his political statements and actions. Some people believe his scientific achievements should matter more than his opinions.
  2. The discussion raises concerns about mixing politics with science. It highlights the importance of judging scientific work fairly, based on its merit, rather than personal beliefs.
  3. The Royal Society faces pressure to prioritize political views over scientific excellence. How they respond could set an important example for scientific communities everywhere.
135 implied HN points 02 Feb 25
  1. When you have a baby, focus on them immediately if you're in charge. Don't get distracted by work or other things.
  2. If your baby starts crying, follow a checklist of things to try, like checking their diaper or feeding them.
  3. If you can't calm your baby, it's okay to ask your partner for help, but try to solve the problem first before calling.
213 implied HN points 15 Dec 24
  1. Merit-based science has significantly improved our lives by leading to important inventions and medical advancements. It relies on rewarding talent and hard work, enabling people from various backgrounds to succeed.
  2. There is a growing concern about the influence of ideology on science, especially with movements pushing for diversity and equity. Some believe these changes hinder the scientific process and meritocracy.
  3. Despite claims of bias in science, studies suggest that many of these allegations lack strong evidence. Some researchers argue that society has made progress in creating equal opportunities in STEM fields.
234 implied HN points 10 Nov 24
  1. There's a clash in universities between those who believe in objective truth and those who focus on social justice. This disagreement is affecting how knowledge is produced and shared.
  2. Universities are increasingly favoring identity-based policies over merit in admissions and hiring. This means some qualified candidates may be overlooked because of their race or background.
  3. The case of Amy Wax highlights the tensions of this debate. She faced sanctions for her views while other controversial opinions on campus seem to be ignored.
163 implied HN points 22 Dec 24
  1. All four experts agreed that stopping nuclear energy development after the Three Mile Island accident was a big mistake. If nuclear power had been embraced earlier, we might have made better progress on reducing carbon emissions.
  2. There's a strong belief that we can still fully commit to nuclear energy now because the technology is safe and effective. The main barriers are complex regulations and legal challenges that make it hard to move forward.
  3. The panel recognized that achieving NetZero carbon emissions soon will be very difficult. It might be time for people with differing views on climate to collaborate and focus on making nuclear energy more widely used.
135 implied HN points 02 Jan 25
  1. Censorship in academic settings can limit the discussion of important truths. When researchers can't speak freely, society misses out on valuable insights.
  2. There are organizations and conferences focused on addressing and fighting against academic censorship. These groups aim to protect freedom of thought and promote open conversations.
  3. The Journal of Controversial Ideas allows authors to publish under pseudonyms. This encourages debate on sensitive topics while safeguarding individuals' careers and safety.
206 implied HN points 03 Nov 24
  1. Many men are avoiding university because they feel outnumbered by women and see fewer opportunities for relationships. This trend reflects a change in the gender dynamics at schools.
  2. The university environment is increasingly seen as accommodating to women while being less appealing to men. This might lead men to pursue different paths for their careers.
  3. There are concerns about how the current educational focus on diversity and inclusion is affecting the overall representation of men in universities, possibly impacting future relationships and social dynamics.
170 implied HN points 24 Nov 24
  1. The Nakba has affected scientific communities and education by promoting self-censorship and political influences, which can hinder rational debate and progress.
  2. The main issue for Palestinians in achieving statehood lies in their insistence on Israel losing its state, rather than just fighting for their own identity and rights.
  3. Many phrases related to the conflict carry different meanings than they seem to suggest, often masking deeper political agendas or historical inaccuracies.
163 implied HN points 17 Nov 24
  1. Ideology-Based Investigations (IBIs) are studies that lack scientific rigor and often rely on philosophical beliefs instead. These can create a false sense of credibility, leading to flawed conclusions.
  2. The oppressor-oppressed binary is a concept widely used in academia that can skew research and findings. This way of thinking has influenced many institutions and projects, often prioritizing ideology over factual analysis.
  3. Many thinkers and writers may criticize authoritarianism but fail to see the biases and pitfalls within their own ideological views. It's important for everyone to recognize these blind spots to promote a more truthful and open society.
99 implied HN points 05 Jan 25
  1. MIT recently banned a student magazine for an article discussing the limitations of nonviolent protest, sparking a debate about free speech on campus.
  2. The situation highlights how expressing controversial or radical ideas can lead to disciplinary actions at universities.
  3. The case shows the challenges students face when trying to discuss extreme views and the balance between safety and free expression in academic settings.
128 implied HN points 08 Dec 24
  1. Entrepreneurship is complex and can't be easily taught in schools. It's not just about making money; it involves creativity, risk-taking, and personal traits.
  2. Intellectual property rights are crucial for protecting new business ideas. Entrepreneurs need these rights to ensure their innovations are safe from theft.
  3. Current approaches to teaching entrepreneurship often mix social issues with business principles, which may confuse the true goals of innovation and success in the marketplace.
78 implied HN points 19 Jan 25
  1. MIT students on average want around two children. The desire varies across different demographics and can be influenced by factors like gender and relationship status.
  2. Women at MIT generally desire fewer children, with many expressing concerns about balancing family and career. In contrast, men tend to prefer slightly larger families.
  3. Religious beliefs can affect how many children students want, with religious individuals generally preferring more children than those who identify as non-religious.
92 implied HN points 29 Dec 24
  1. There's a divide between the humanities and STEM fields, which can lead to a lack of understanding and cooperation. This split has been growing over the years and is sometimes seen as a 'culture war.'
  2. Non-knowledgeable behaviors, like group think and over-emphasizing feelings, are affecting how knowledge is developed and shared. It's important to stick to processes that encourage truth and understanding.
  3. In academia, different cognitive traits can be found in STEM compared to the humanities. Recognizing these differences might help us understand the ongoing issues in knowledge creation and communication.
99 implied HN points 27 Oct 24
  1. A manifesto proposes new ideas for creating a society without inequalities. It suggests that previous attempts to create equal societies didn't go far enough and need a clearer plan.
  2. The text emphasizes that traditional values and beliefs are being challenged and reshaped. It argues that modern ideas about rights and freedoms often contradict each other, creating confusion.
  3. Finally, it highlights the importance of intellectual influence in societal change. The manifesto believes that a well-organized group can push for revolutionary changes, even in societies that seem to resist them.
370 implied HN points 07 Jan 24
  1. Grievance training in American schools is presenting a one-sided and divisive narrative about land appropriation and cultural genocide.
  2. Teachers are asserting that U.S. lands were stolen from Native Americans, pushing for reparations or land return without room for questioning.
  3. The article argues against collective guilt narratives, emphasizing the importance of individual accountability and due process.
291 implied HN points 03 Mar 24
  1. Listening to the Congressional testimony on free speech exposed a lack of consistent application of concepts at universities.
  2. Public trust in higher education has significantly declined based on surveys due to real or perceived failures of universities.
  3. Universities facing public backlash have responded defensively rather than engaging in introspection, potentially leading to further erosion of trust.
362 implied HN points 10 Dec 23
  1. DEI statements as a required component for job applications can have a corrosive effect on the math community.
  2. Compelled speech in DEI statements may lead to a population of conformists in math departments.
  3. The AMS's lack of investigation into compelled DEI statements raises concerns about the impact on the math community.
384 implied HN points 29 Oct 23
  1. Postmodernism and nihilism have influenced academic institutions, leading to moral relativism and a shift away from open inquiry and tolerance.
  2. The push for 'anti-racism' has sometimes resulted in discriminatory practices, undermining merit-based systems and educational opportunities.
  3. A call to challenge and openly debate harmful ideologies that have infiltrated academic institutions and to reaffirm the importance of objective truth and moral clarity.
270 implied HN points 11 Feb 24
  1. STEM education is facing challenges with the introduction of ideologies like 'Indigenous science', leading to a shift in traditional approaches.
  2. University environments are becoming increasingly focused on equity, diversity, and inclusion, which can sometimes lead to conflict with academic freedom and rational discourse.
  3. There is a concern among some STEM professors about the impact of ideological pressures on teaching quality, mental health, and innovation within academic environments.
199 implied HN points 17 Mar 24
  1. The theme year for Freedom of Expression at Cornell University is controversial, focusing on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI).
  2. There is a concern about the prioritization of DEI over free speech, leading to a culture of fear and conformity on campus.
  3. Efforts are being made to bring in speakers who promote fearless, rational, and civil speech on campus, to counteract the perceived lack of free expression.