The hottest Research Integrity Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top Science Topics
COVID Reason 753 implied HN points 15 Oct 24
  1. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was a flood of poor-quality scientific studies. Many rushed papers were published that had unreliable findings, highlighting a major issue in research standards.
  2. To improve science in the future, researchers need to focus on real problems and provide real-world data instead of relying heavily on models. Transparency is also crucial so everyone can trust the research and its sources.
  3. Healthcare workers faced immense challenges during the pandemic and deserve more support. The lessons learned from this crisis should help us prioritize quality scientific work and the human aspect of healthcare.
More is Different 32 implied HN points 29 Jun 25
  1. A paper from MIT claimed AI helps scientists be more productive, but it turned out to be fake. The student behind it has been expelled and the paper withdrawn.
  2. Many respected people praised the fake paper, not realizing it was based on unreliable data. This shows how easily misinformation can spread in academic circles.
  3. The incident highlights the need for a culture where scientists can question research openly. Asking tough questions could help prevent fraud and ensure better scientific practices.
Heterodox STEM 192 implied HN points 08 Jun 25
  1. It's important for scientists to report accurate information about climate change, without exaggerating risks. This helps keep trust in science strong.
  2. Some published studies can mislead people by only showing negative aspects of climate data. A balanced view is necessary to understand the full picture.
  3. We should encourage honest and thorough research that combines both good and bad news about our world. Pursuing the truth is essential.
Science Forever 159 implied HN points 28 Feb 24
  1. Holden Thorp was named by STAT News to the STATUS list of top 50 leaders in the life sciences for his work in research integrity.
  2. Thorp has challenged the stigma around corrections and retractions in scientific publishing, advocating for increasing public trust in the scientific enterprise.
  3. Recognition also goes to the team at Science, including Valda Vinson, Lauren Kmec, Meagan Phelan, and Lisa Chong, for their contributions to research policies and Thorp's work.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
Steve Kirsch's newsletter 24 implied HN points 06 Mar 24
  1. Scientific journals have been retracting papers unethically for decades, and it's time for this unethical practice to stop
  2. The author is suing Springer Nature for $250M in punitive damages due to the unethical retraction of their COVID harms paper
  3. The impact of the retracted paper on changing views, even of popular figures like Dr. Boz, highlights the importance of holding journals accountable and seeking justice