The hottest Academic Publishing Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top Technology Topics
Briefly Bio β€’ 19 implied HN points β€’ 31 Oct 24
  1. Many experiments go unpublished because they're too small or inconclusive. Even if they don't seem important, they really help build bigger discoveries.
  2. It's important for scientists to share these lesser-known experiments. Sharing can help the whole field of science progress faster.
  3. Open science encourages collaboration. Scientists and companies should talk to each other about new ways to share research.
AI Research & Strategy β€’ 297 implied HN points β€’ 01 Sep 24
  1. People often find AI research ideas by reading papers, talking to experts, or browsing online platforms like Twitter and GitHub. These are effective ways to spark inspiration.
  2. There are various strategies for generating AI research ideas, such as inventing new tasks, improving existing methods, or exploring gaps in current research. Each approach can lead to publishing valuable findings.
  3. Building better AI research assistants can involve encoding these idea-generation strategies into their programming. This could make them more effective in supporting researchers.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss β€’ 8778 implied HN points β€’ 10 Jul 23
  1. The retraction of a scientific article on Rapid Onset Gender Dysphoria sparked controversy and highlighted the influence of activist movements in academia.
  2. The authors faced accusations of violating editorial policies around consent, which they refuted by claiming to have followed ethical research practices.
  3. Despite the retraction, the authors plan to continue studying the controversial topic of ROGD, emphasizing the importance of scientific inquiry and resisting censorship.
Science Forever β€’ 159 implied HN points β€’ 28 Feb 24
  1. Holden Thorp was named by STAT News to the STATUS list of top 50 leaders in the life sciences for his work in research integrity.
  2. Thorp has challenged the stigma around corrections and retractions in scientific publishing, advocating for increasing public trust in the scientific enterprise.
  3. Recognition also goes to the team at Science, including Valda Vinson, Lauren Kmec, Meagan Phelan, and Lisa Chong, for their contributions to research policies and Thorp's work.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
Pekingnology β€’ 188 implied HN points β€’ 15 Jan 24
  1. The SCMP report falsely claimed a link between Baidu and the Chinese military, resulting in a significant financial impact on Baidu.
  2. The Chinese journal paper discussed theoretical ideas, not real 'military AI' experiments, and lacked academic rigor in its approach.
  3. The paper's experiments were basic simulated scenarios, not real tests, and did not provide actionable insights or findings for military application.
A Biologist's Guide to Life β€’ 51 implied HN points β€’ 23 Feb 24
  1. Peer review in the scientific community can be flawed, biased, and influenced by power dynamics, leading to the suppression of scientific findings.
  2. Scientific papers can face unfair rejection based on personal biases, conflicts of interest, and editorial decisions.
  3. The current scientific publishing system may hinder the open discussion and publication of research that challenges established beliefs or powerful stakeholders in the field.
Holodoxa β€’ 39 implied HN points β€’ 21 Jul 22
  1. Critically looking at flashy but weak academic research is essential to avoid misguided social initiatives based on unreliable findings
  2. Popular media and journalistic venues often promote non-replicable science as easy solutions to complex problems, leading to wasteful institutional investments in ineffective programs
  3. Emphasizing rigorous scientific methods and exploring alternative solutions beyond 'quick fixes' is crucial in addressing social issues and avoiding costly yet ineffective interventions