The hottest Self defense Substack posts right now

The author had a history of hating guns but began to rethink this perspective after personal experiences and conversations with a friend.
Having a gun in the house made the author feel uneasy at first, but they took a step towards embracing self-reliance.
The author realized that understanding guns was important for feeling more secure and less dependent on government protection.

The concept of 'self-defense' is often misused to justify violent actions, including genocide. Many times, countries or groups claim they are protecting themselves while their actions actually harm innocent people.
History shows that justifications for violence, like 'self-defense', have been used in various genocides, such as the Armenian Genocide and the Holocaust. These tragedies remind us that this reasoning can lead to horrific outcomes.
It's important to question the narrative of self-defense when it leads to widespread harm. We should critically evaluate claims made by powerful entities and hold them accountable for their actions.

Self-defense laws like castle doctrine let people protect their homes without fear of legal trouble. It puts the responsibility on intruders, making it fairer for homeowners.
Stand your ground laws mean you can defend yourself without needing to retreat when faced with danger. This concept challenges laws that require people to run away from an aggressor.
Juries play an important role in the justice system. They can make choices based on their beliefs and experiences, which can influence fair outcomes in court.

The approach to tackling crime highlighted in the post is seen as demoralizing and not effective in preventing criminal activities.
Encouraging citizens to make crime easier can embolden criminals and make individuals feel unsafe and defenseless.
The post suggests a different approach of self-defense, like owning a pump action shotgun, as a means to protect one's property and family from violent invaders.

Self defense rules should have narrow parameters
Debates on self defense often carry feelings more than facts
Expanding self defense rules could lead to dangerous escalation in violent interactions

Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

A Wisconsin jury found Kyle Rittenhouse not guilty, ruling that he acted in self-defense. This decision raised concerns about safety in America.
Rittenhouse used an automatic rifle during a chaotic situation, where he killed two people and injured another. Many people are worried about the implications of this case.
The events took place during riots in Kenosha, which shows how violence can escalate during protests. This makes discussions about gun laws and self-defense even more important.

Self-defense is important but limited, especially in civilized society.
It's crucial to have a hardline on self-defense to prevent excessive force.
The 'what if he had a gun' argument can lead to justifying any escalation and reveals cowardice.

Bodily autonomy is a fundamental right in a free society.
Pregnancy risks highlight the importance of safeguarding a woman's right to choose.
Forcing a woman to carry a pregnancy violates her right to self-defense and bodily autonomy.

MMA has ancient roots and involves a combination of boxing and wrestling - it's a significant sport in history and offers real world utility.
MMA teaches discipline, emotional control, respect, and responsibility; it's not just about combat skills, but also about protecting oneself and others.
In a world where violent assaults are increasing and law enforcement is facing challenges, knowing self-defense through MMA can be a practical necessity for protecting loved ones.