The hottest Military Action Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 755 implied HN points 01 Jul 25
  1. The U.S. conducted a successful strike on Iran's nuclear program, achieving its goals quickly with minimal prolonged conflict.
  2. President Trump and his administration uphold a nationalist approach to foreign policy, rejecting the typical labels of neoconservatism or isolationism.
  3. This action may spark more serious discussions about U.S. foreign policy, moving beyond the usual media narratives.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 4623 implied HN points 22 Jun 25
  1. Trump promised to stop Iran from getting nuclear weapons and acted on that promise with a military strike.
  2. The U.S. used powerful bombs to hit Iran's nuclear sites, which other countries might not have been able to damage as effectively.
  3. Despite some opposition from within his team, Trump made a bold choice to protect global safety.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 2383 implied HN points 23 Jun 25
  1. The Democrats are not speaking up about important foreign policy issues, especially regarding Iran. This is surprising since they usually have a lot to say on other topics.
  2. Most of the discussion about military action in Iran is happening mostly among Republicans and not the Democrats. This shows a lack of engagement from the Democratic side.
  3. There's a big change happening in the Middle East due to military actions, but the Democrats seem focused on issues that are not related to international conflicts. This could affect their influence in major decisions.
Caitlin’s Newsletter 2896 implied HN points 22 Jun 25
  1. The U.S. military has bombed Iranian nuclear sites, which puts American troops in danger of retaliation. This could escalate into a full-scale war.
  2. Iran warned that they would attack U.S. bases in response to the bombings. If U.S. troops are harmed, it will not be the fault of Iran but the fault of those who made the decision to attack.
  3. The situation could have been avoided if previous diplomatic agreements with Iran were honored. Instead, actions taken have led to a potential crisis that could worsen.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 1530 implied HN points 23 Jun 25
  1. The term 'surgical strike' suggests a precise, low-casualty military action, appealing to Americans who dislike high military casualties. It implies that complex international issues can be solved quickly and easily.
  2. Historically, 'surgical strike' started as a sarcastic term about the violence of air strikes. It has evolved to mean targeted military actions, especially since precision weapons became more common.
  3. Trump's use of surgical strikes in conflicts aims to show strength and deter future threats while also trying to promote peace. This reflects a desire for decisive actions in foreign policy.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 792 implied HN points 26 Jun 25
  1. A report suggests that U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran's nuclear program had only minor effects, raising questions about their overall impact.
  2. The strikes targeted key facilities associated with Iran's nuclear efforts, including offices linked to a prominent scientist.
  3. Experts and agencies are now trying to determine exactly how much progress Iran's nuclear program has lost due to these military actions.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 2786 implied HN points 13 Jun 25
  1. Israel launched a significant military strike against Iran, targeting its nuclear program and military leaders. This surprise attack marks a major escalation in the conflict between the two nations.
  2. There are high tensions as Iran has promised to retaliate for the strikes. Israel is preparing for possible attacks in response to its actions.
  3. Experts believe this event could change the dynamics of the Middle East and reduce the threat of Iran obtaining nuclear weapons, but it also raises risks of further conflict.
Caitlin’s Newsletter 2579 implied HN points 13 Jun 25
  1. Israel has started bombing Iran with claims of making preemptive strikes, but the media is just repeating these claims without proof.
  2. Future headlines might twist the story to show Israel as a victim and the U.S. as an innocent bystander.
  3. There are concerns about the U.S. getting more involved in Middle Eastern conflicts, which many people fear could lead to a bigger war.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 709 implied HN points 23 Jun 25
  1. Iran moved 16 cargo trucks to its Fordow nuclear site just before a US attack, sparking concerns about their contents.
  2. Experts worry that Iran may have secretly relocated critical nuclear materials before the bombing.
  3. The US's military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities were claimed to be a success, but the situation is more complex than it seems.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 1817 implied HN points 13 Jun 25
  1. Donald Trump openly supports Israel and its fight against Iran, showing where he stands on foreign policy. This support is stronger than what many politicians offer.
  2. There's a divide among Trump’s supporters, especially within the Republican Party, regarding how America should engage with the world. Some believe in a more restrained and noninterventionist approach.
  3. The situation reveals ongoing tensions in Trump's administration about the right way to handle foreign relations and military action. This debate is becoming more important as events unfold.
Caitlin’s Newsletter 1983 implied HN points 11 Jun 25
  1. Israel has repeatedly denied accusations of harming civilians seeking aid, but reports indicate that many have been killed during these events.
  2. There have been multiple incidents where Israeli forces opened fire on crowds trying to access humanitarian assistance in Gaza, leading to significant casualties.
  3. Despite the denials from Israeli officials, evidence from media reports suggests that these actions are ongoing and that Israel has a history of not being truthful about its military operations.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 403 implied HN points 22 Jun 25
  1. There's a lot of discussion about whether recent military actions will bring peace or create more conflict. People have mixed feelings about it.
  2. Social media is buzzing with reactions, from joy to anger, as many express their political views on these developments.
  3. It’s unclear what the long-term effects of this situation will be. Even officials might not fully understand what's happening right now.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 250 implied HN points 22 Jun 25
  1. Trump announced a successful attack on three key Iranian nuclear sites, marking a significant moment in his foreign policy. This could have major effects on international relations.
  2. There are concerns about how Iran might respond to this military action, which could escalate tensions in the Middle East.
  3. Experts will discuss the implications of this decision for both regional dynamics and U.S. domestic politics during a livestream event.
Common Sense with Bari Weiss 352 implied HN points 17 Jun 25
  1. The U.S. is debating whether to intervene in Iran to stop its nuclear program, especially after Israel's recent actions. It's a big decision for President Trump, who needs to consider if Iran is a real threat.
  2. There are two main views on this issue: one group believes the U.S. should stay out of Middle Eastern conflicts, while the other supports military action to prevent Iran from getting nuclear weapons.
  3. Israeli leaders argue that Iran's threat is not just a regional issue but affects global security, including the U.S. This raises questions about America's role in international conflicts.
C.O.P. Central Organizing Principle. 60 implied HN points 13 Jun 25
  1. Trump's decision to bomb Iran could lead to serious consequences for his reputation and safety.
  2. There is a belief that the U.S. government and Israel are working closely together, and this bombing might be a distraction from other issues.
  3. If the situation escalates, Americans might react strongly against Trump and the government, calling for major changes in leadership.
Letters from an American 22 implied HN points 24 Jun 25
  1. Trump made a military decision to strike Iran after seeing positive media coverage of Israel's actions. This shows how much he valued public perception over intelligence.
  2. The U.S. history with Iran is complicated, starting from support for the Shah to tensions after the 1979 revolution. These past events have shaped current U.S.-Iran relations.
  3. The Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to deport migrants to other countries without much process. This move may put vulnerable people in dangerous situations.
The Corbett Report 25 implied HN points 14 Jun 25
  1. Israel carried out attacks on Iran as part of a military operation, claiming it was necessary for its survival. This led to immediate retaliation from Iran using drones and missiles against Israel.
  2. The situation escalated from long-standing tensions over Iran's nuclear program, with accusations of Iran rapidly advancing toward creating nuclear weapons. In reality, many intelligence reports have suggested that Iran is not close to developing a nuclear bomb.
  3. Responses from international powers could shape the future of this conflict. Many countries, including Russia and China, condemned Israel's actions, which could lead to a broader regional war depending on how countries react going forward.
Caitlin’s Newsletter 2468 implied HN points 27 Dec 24
  1. The actions of the Israeli military in Gaza have been confirmed to be deliberately targeting civilians. Many reports and testimonies highlight that civilian casualties are not accidental.
  2. The narrative used to justify these actions, like claiming civilians are human shields, has been discredited. There's a growing insistence that denying this reality is increasingly difficult.
  3. Society’s beliefs about power and inequality are shaped by stories that benefit those in control. It's possible to change this dynamic if enough people decide to take action against the current system.
Caitlin’s Newsletter 1634 implied HN points 31 Jan 25
  1. Many Palestinians are still being killed in Gaza, even after a ceasefire was announced. The ongoing violence raises concerns about the true nature of this supposed ceasefire.
  2. Palestinian lives are often viewed as less valuable compared to Israeli lives. This unequal perspective contributes to the ongoing violence and suffering in the region.
  3. There are troubling instances of dehumanization where Palestinians are seen as expendable. This mindset can lead to tragic outcomes, such as the killing of innocent civilians, including children.
Caitlin’s Newsletter 1550 implied HN points 27 Jan 25
  1. A two-year-old girl was tragically killed by Israeli forces in the West Bank, highlighting the ongoing violence in the region. It's heartbreaking to see such young lives lost.
  2. The author expresses deep emotional pain and despair regarding the loss of innocent lives, especially children, in conflict situations. These deaths leave a lasting impact on families and communities.
  3. The repetition of such tragedies can feel overwhelming, as if each death adds to an endless cycle of suffering. This ongoing situation calls for more awareness and compassion for those affected.
Letters from an American 21 implied HN points 22 Jun 25
  1. President Trump announced a military strike on Iranian nuclear sites, claiming it was a successful operation to eliminate Iran's nuclear threat.
  2. He emphasized that this attack aimed to make Iran agree to peace and warned of more severe actions if they did not comply.
  3. Trump celebrated the attack as a significant achievement for the U.S. military, asserting that it demonstrated superior military capability.
The Cosmopolitan Globalist 18 implied HN points 13 Jun 25
  1. Israel has launched a major military operation called Operation Rising Lion, targeting Iran's nuclear facilities and military leadership. It involves extensive airstrikes and has already caused significant damage.
  2. Iran has responded to these attacks by launching drones and missiles toward Israel, indicating that they view this as an act of war. The situation is escalating rapidly and may involve further retaliation.
  3. International reactions are mixed, with various countries expressing alarm. The operation may disrupt ongoing diplomatic efforts regarding Iran's nuclear program and could lead to broader conflict in the Middle East.
Caitlin’s Newsletter 1941 implied HN points 11 Dec 24
  1. The term 'terrorist organization' is often used politically, depending on whether a group benefits or harms U.S. interests.
  2. Groups that fight against the U.S. or its allies usually get labeled as terrorists, while friends of the U.S. can commit violence without that label.
  3. This inconsistency shows that the label is more about controlling narratives than about actual behavior.
Caitlin’s Newsletter 1802 implied HN points 17 Dec 24
  1. Israel and Trump's administration seem eager to attack Iran now that Syria's air defenses are out of the way. This could lead to airstrikes aimed at stopping Iran from developing nuclear weapons, despite lack of evidence for such activities.
  2. There's a belief that many political movements can be fake and serve to maintain the current power structures instead of creating real change. This suggests that people's frustrations are often redirected back into the system rather than helping them fight against it.
  3. The extreme wealth of billionaires is often seen as irrational. Instead of acting for the common good, their wealth accumulation is driven by personal issues and inner pain, harming society in the process.
Eunomia 727 implied HN points 18 Jan 24
  1. Attacking the Houthis in Yemen with threats and airstrikes is not stopping attacks on shipping and may escalate the situation.
  2. The U.S. designation of the Houthis as terrorists could further empower them politically and increase their popularity.
  3. The U.S. often relies on force and sanctions in international issues, but addressing the war in Gaza may be a more effective solution.
Eunomia 569 implied HN points 23 Jan 24
  1. The Biden administration's military campaign in Yemen is illegal and unauthorized by Congress.
  2. There is skepticism that the campaign will achieve its goals, making it a pointless endeavor.
  3. The decision to continue the strikes is driven by ideology rather than national interest, reflecting larger issues in U.S. foreign policy.
Caitlin’s Newsletter 1811 implied HN points 01 Feb 24
  1. President Biden is reportedly preparing for a bombing campaign in the Middle East in retaliation for a drone attack, potentially escalating to a full-blown war with Iran.
  2. The warmongering policies of the current US president involve initiating a bombing campaign in Yemen and supporting a genocide in Gaza.
  3. The behavior of Democratic Party leaders, including Nancy Pelosi, raises concerns about their support for war and genocide, despite portraying themselves as responsible humanitarians.
Eunomia 275 implied HN points 19 Jan 24
  1. There's always a choice when deciding whether to use force or not, and usually, there are better options than resorting to force.
  2. The U.S. won't likely compel Houthi compliance through force; attacking Iranian targets would worsen the conflict.
  3. Taking military action that you expect will make things worse is both stupid and wrong.
The Chris Hedges Report 367 implied HN points 11 Nov 23
  1. Israel's genocidal attacks in Gaza are killing hundreds, including children, and targeting hospitals.
  2. International and humanitarian laws seem meaningless in the face of Israel's actions in Gaza.
  3. The relentless bombardment by Israel is destroying Gaza's health system, leaving hospitals and patients under fire.
KERFUFFLE 53 implied HN points 02 Nov 24
  1. Gaza is facing severe destruction and human suffering. Many reports describe civilians being killed and families being torn apart during the conflict.
  2. The scale of military retaliation from Israel is unprecedented, causing not only immediate casualties but also long-term issues like famine and homelessness.
  3. This conflict involves global implications, especially for Americans, as U.S. support influences the situation, and we may have to deal with the consequences of these actions in the future.
C.O.P. Central Organizing Principle. 18 implied HN points 14 Dec 24
  1. The Syrian Army is still fighting and has not surrendered to opposing groups backed by the US. This indicates their determination to maintain control.
  2. There is ongoing violence from the HTS terrorists against unarmed Syrian citizens, which is being shared on social media. This situation shows the serious threats faced by ordinary people in Syria.
  3. The US's involvement in Syria is viewed as a declining empire facing challenges at home, suggesting a possible shift in global power dynamics.
Matt’s Five Points 0 implied HN points 19 Apr 18
  1. Warmaking is mostly a political issue, not a legal one. Courts usually avoid deciding if a war is legal, leaving it to Congress and the President to argue.
  2. Congress still plays an important role in war decisions, even if presidents sometimes act alone. A lack of congressional support can limit the scale of military actions.
  3. The U.S. Constitution favors keeping things the same, making it hard to change or limit presidential powers once granted. To help Congress keep control, war authorizations should have expiration clauses to reassess their necessity regularly.