G. Elliott Morris's Newsletter $5 / month

G. Elliott Morris's Newsletter delves into the intricacies of polls, public opinion, and democracy, emphasizing the analysis and improvement of polling techniques, voter behavior, and the implications for electoral outcomes. It offers critiques, updates on methodologies, and reflections on the dynamics within the Republican party, particularly concerning Donald Trump.

Polling Analysis and Methodologies Public Opinion and Voter Behavior Election Forecasts and Predictions Political Commentary Democracy and Electoral Systems Data Journalism Republican Party Dynamics

The hottest Substack posts of G. Elliott Morris's Newsletter

And their main takeaways
157 implied HN points β€’ 25 Jan 24
  1. 538 has updated their pollster ratings for the 2024 general election, focusing on empirical accuracy and methodological transparency
  2. The new methodology ranks pollsters based on bias, recency, sample size, time to election, and methodological transparency
  3. Pollscore and Transparency Score are combined to evaluate pollster quality, with a star grading system used to represent performance
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
452 implied HN points β€’ 22 May 23
  1. Polls should be adjusted based on both accuracy and bias, evaluated based on all factors of data-generating process.
  2. Future polling aggregation may move towards Bayesian statistical techniques for measurement-oriented models.
  3. Models focusing on measurement over prediction can help explore polling components directly, improving journalistic storytelling.
157 implied HN points β€’ 27 Feb 23
  1. Aggregating public opinions may mean slightly less accurate election forecasts, which is acceptable.
  2. Polls dramatically overperformed expectations in the 2022 midterms, despite popular misconceptions.
  3. It's important to be cautious of biased pollsters and consider the methodology, credibility, and track record of pollsters before including their data in models.
137 implied HN points β€’ 25 Feb 23
  1. Majority of Americans, including 40% of Republicans, support legal abortions
  2. Americans prefer government compromise over gridlock, especially regarding debt-ceiling decisions
  3. Historical evidence shows voters have historically punished presidents for poor economic performance
117 implied HN points β€’ 10 Apr 23
  1. Artificial intelligence and big data cannot fully replace public opinion polls, as they rely on polls for calibration and may not be as reliable for all groups.
  2. Changes in polling methods, like switching from phone to online surveys, can impact results, highlighting the importance of consistency over time.
  3. Studies show genuine change in attitudes, like increasing racial liberalism, but also caution against biases affecting survey responses.
78 implied HN points β€’ 15 Aug 20
  1. The author receives job advice requests despite being young and early in their career.
  2. The author published a post with job advice for upcoming data journalists and analysts.
  3. The author's intention is to help others improve their prospects in the field.
19 implied HN points β€’ 04 Dec 20
  1. Annual holiday subscription special with a 50% discount for new subscriptions made before January 1st, 2021.
  2. Subscribers get access to extra posts, making a huge difference to the writer and supporting their work.
  3. Various premium articles and content available in the archive for paying subscribers.
0 implied HN points β€’ 07 Oct 19
  1. You can sign up for free trials of subscriber-only content until November 1st, 2019.
  2. Check out the link for a 14-day free trial of the newsletter.
  3. Subscription includes access to exclusive content, like the recent email on impeachment.
0 implied HN points β€’ 05 Jan 24
  1. Trump's strong lead in primary polls could give him an even stronger advantage in delegate math.
  2. Winning a majority of delegates is crucial for Trump, as it signals loyalty and strength within his party.
  3. Delegate allocation rules play a significant role in determining the outcome of the Republican presidential nomination.