The hottest Corrections Substack posts right now

A guest post was removed after it was found to contain inaccuracies.
The publication says it values rigorous research and admits its editorial process failed to properly vet the piece.
They acknowledge the mistake, thank readers who pointed it out, and signal a commitment to improve editorial standards going forward.

A major news outlet misstated the ages tied to a criminal plea; official records show the plea involved a 19-year-old and a 17-year-old, not a conviction related to a 14-year-old.
Reporting on the case is messy and often inaccurate, and many outlets failed to respond to correction requests, though a few reporters quickly clarified their wording.
A broader review of how the case was covered is being planned, with critics saying the overall reporting has serious problems and promising more investigation.

Acknowledging and reflecting on one's own biases is important to maintain transparency and credibility in discussions.
Amidst misinformation, there is frustration that detailed research is often overlooked in favor of easily digestible but misleading content.
Clarifying and correcting misleading information, particularly on sensitive topics like life and death situations, is crucial for ensuring accurate discourse.

Apoorva Mandavilli is giving lectures on misinformation even though her articles have many corrections
The errors in Apoorva Mandavilli's articles raise concerns about her credibility
It's important to address the issue of misinformation and accuracy in journalism

Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

Extensive corrections in scientific papers may lead to a retraction if confidence is lacking
Retracting a paper could be considered if there is an accumulation of errors, causing editors to lose confidence in the data integrity
Transparently correcting errors in scientific research is crucial to maintain the integrity of the self-correcting process of science

A crucial line in the study was misread, leading to the need for a retraction of the article.
The article incorrectly claimed that unvaccinated people were part of the study, when in fact all participants were vaccinated.
The broader point still stands that there is increasing evidence vaccines may not prevent deaths once they stop preventing infection.