The hottest Political Philosophy Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways

First Hand Data

David Friedman’s Substack • 368 implied HN points • 08 Dec 25

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Firsthand experience can change your beliefs because much accepted knowledge is passed secondhand or can be wrong or dishonest, so stay skeptical of orthodoxies.
Don’t assume experts or enforcers will behave as theory says; their incentives shape their actions, so judge institutions by how people actually act.
Try new activities to learn your real strengths and weaknesses, and remember that as you age you may shift from inventing solutions to relying on past experience, so use fluid thinking for novel problems.

Roots of Generational Depression

Unstable Orbits • 67 implied HN points • 31 Jan 26

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Indefinite optimism—hoping for a better future without a concrete plan—leads to caution, indecision, and emotional drain as people hedge and avoid commitments.
The pervasive uncertainty undercuts politics and social life and is more damaging than any specific ideology because it quietly saps energy while beliefs can still be noticed and changed.
The remedy is to find and commit to a clear, ongoing vision and actively shape the future instead of oscillating between hope and fear.

Hidden Open Thread 409.5

Astral Codex Ten • 412 implied HN points • 28 Nov 25

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

This post is meant for paid subscribers only.
There are options to subscribe or sign in for existing members.
The content is part of an ongoing thread for discussion among readers.

There are four ways of changing the world

Philosophy bear • 85 implied HN points • 03 Feb 26

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

There are four basic ways people change the world: by helping or blocking others (facilitation/anti-facilitation), by discovering or creating, by organizing and leading groups, and by doing a single attention‑grabbing act (exemplification).
Everyday roles map onto these types: parents or assassins can facilitate or anti‑facilitate, scientists and artists discover or create, politicians and organizers change things through groups, and athletes or martyrs exemplify change by their acts.
Some cases blur or fall outside the categories—accidents, butterfly‑effect stories, and mixed actions can be tricky—but the taxonomy is meant to capture legible, attributable forms of world‑changing influence.

Dekanting moral philosophy

Optimally Irrational • 59 implied HN points • 06 Feb 26

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Kant’s categorical imperative doesn’t follow from pure rationality because your individual choice can’t make others follow the same rule, so behaving as if everyone would comply can be irrational in strategic situations.
Game theory shows morality is best understood as self‑enforcing social conventions: stable moral rules are conditional “oughts” that arise because following them serves each person’s interests given what others do.
Evolved moral feelings make cooperation feel like an absolute duty, but treating those feelings as unconditional can produce worse outcomes in problems like prisoner’s dilemmas, mutual deterrence standoffs, or strategic voting.

Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

Further Reflections On Virtuous Fraud

David Friedman’s Substack • 278 implied HN points • 11 Dec 25

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Sometimes people think it’s okay to hide or distort the truth if they believe the lie will lead to better social outcomes, a practice often called "virtuous fraud".
That temptation appears in many contexts — from denying evolution to preserve religion, to editors weighing publication of risky science, to politicians exaggerating facts to win support for policies.
Deciding whether deception is justified relies on uncertain empirical beliefs and invites hypocrisy and misuse, because good intentions can produce bad results or be applied selectively.

The Amoralists

KERFUFFLE • 89 implied HN points • 12 Jan 26

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Rulers can replace costly military occupation by creating a moral or religious system that makes people willingly obey, so subjects see submission as divinely right rather than coerced.
When power is perceived as legitimate, control depends more on ideas and beliefs than on force, so political battles shift from armies to priests, philosophers, and demagogues.
Legitimacy makes rule self-sustaining and expansionary because converted subjects will defend and spread the order, but it also makes power vulnerable to ideological attacks and requires continual intellectual work to maintain.

Epistemic Privilege

Fake Noûs • 277 implied HN points • 22 Nov 25

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

The idea of 'epistemic privilege' says we should accept testimony from marginalized people about their oppression because they have special access to their own experiences, but treating this as a categorical or novel rule is questionable.
Epistemic judgments are being framed as moral and political judgments, so doubting certain testimonies gets labeled an injustice and turned into a marker of factional loyalty rather than a neutral inquiry.
Politicizing who to believe encourages partisan conformity and biased thinking, which undermines honest truth-seeking and makes solving social problems harder while enabling signaling by ideologues.

What Is Evil? (A Philosophical Perspective)

Ethics Under Construction • 41 implied HN points • 08 Feb 26

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Evil is a willful, unjustified attack that destroys another person’s freedom and rejects reason; it’s more than mere wrongdoing.
Evil differs from ordinary immorality or illegality because it repudiates the moral contract. An evildoer can be treated as unfit for society and legally incapacitated.
Philosophy and clear, objective standards help us detect and define evil. This lets societies respond through law and reason instead of emotional or arbitrary punishment.

They won't change their mind

The Stoic Journal • 55 implied HN points • 24 Jan 26

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

People often have different premises, fears, and histories, so they may not change even after clear explanations.
Your job is to offer what you believe is true with kindness and patience. Don't become the kind of person you're arguing against.
Make your case, then let it go — accept that their mind is theirs and yours is yours.

Reality is Breaking

Charles Eisenstein • 26 implied HN points • 16 Feb 26

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

The Epstein files show that elite corruption and long-running cover-ups reach deep into institutions, eroding the moral authority and legitimacy of what we used to call normal.
We are living in a liminal “space between stories” where old narratives are collapsing and people are vulnerable to quick, dangerous replacements; real change means transforming the conditions and habits of power, not just swapping leaders or exacting revenge.
If accountability and honest truth-telling open the way, suppressed knowledge and regenerative practices — from alternative health and social technologies to indigenous wisdom and ecological systems — could help build a more humane, life-centered civilization, but that requires a new relationship to power.

🗽⤴ Elon Musk's America Party: Is It Up Wing?

Faster, Please! • 731 implied HN points • 09 Jul 25

🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Philosophy

Elon Musk's America Party aims to break away from traditional two-party politics and create a new separate political force. This is different from other movements that want to work within the existing system.
Musk's approach to politics is more of a reaction against government inefficiencies, focusing on cutting costs and opposing 'wokeism', while other movements prioritize growth and regulated investment for future prosperity.
The success of Musk’s America Party could push the established parties to adopt more innovative policies, but its effectiveness remains uncertain.

Notes of many things- SPICY edition

Philosophy bear • 128 implied HN points • 15 Dec 25

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

AI is the urgent, game-changing issue: whether models can reliably control GUIs will decide how fast office work is automated, and AI is already crushing markets for human visual art so public policy and funding are needed to preserve human creative practice.
The job-application system is broken and demeaning, wasting huge amounts of time and locking out talent; collective pressure, legal reforms (like interview limits and wage transparency), and even tactical use of AI can force employers to fix it.
Online communities should not act as courts and need simple, fair norms: punish only clear, current malice with a high evidential bar, avoid perpetual shaming for past mistakes, and focus on preserving decency rather than total moral cleansing.

Three Diagnoses of Totalitarianism: Kelley, Arendt, and Desmet in Conversation

Who is Robert Malone • 12 implied HN points • 23 Feb 26

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Ordinary people, not monsters, can become perpetrators when put into certain social and psychological conditions.
Widespread loneliness, atomization, free‑floating anxiety, and lack of meaning create fertile ground for mass formation that suppresses independent thinking and turns people into unquestioning followers.
Preventing totalitarian dynamics requires a multi‑level response: cultivate independent thinking and civic institutions, rebuild genuine social bonds and meaning, and protect vocal dissent to break the spell of collective hypnosis.

The fourfold prophecy engine

Philosophy bear • 42 implied HN points • 25 Jan 26

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Use a simple random method (repeated d4 rolls) to generate four prompt words, then meditate on their connections or turn them into a poem, painting, or scene.
A structured symbol catalogue is provided across four realms—Cosmos, Bios, Psyche, and Polis—each with thematic quartets to supply varied lenses and imagery.
Approach the exercise calmly and with the intention to learn and help; interpret each concept flexibly for self-knowledge and contemplation rather than literal fortune-telling.

Weekend Roundup

Classical Wisdom • 589 implied HN points • 28 Jan 24

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

The post discusses the panel on Marcus Aurelius and the debate on his philosophy and actions.
There is an exploration of Plato's concept of philosopher kings and their rule in the ideal state.
The post mentions exclusive member content on ancient political systems, including Aristophanes' comedy works.

The authoritarian political agenda: beyond populism

Wyclif's Dust • 1341 implied HN points • 25 Jan 25

🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Philosophy

Many recent political leaders, like Trump and Modi, seem to share a dislike for traditional institutions. They often challenge or bypass established political systems and laws to push their agendas.
These leaders come from different backgrounds but have gained support by tapping into public dissatisfaction with current systems. They use populism to connect with voters, even if their specific policies vary widely.
The modern economy has shifted towards large-scale operations, which makes nations and big corporations more intertwined. This shift affects how these leaders approach governance and their relationships with businesses.

What Socrates Teaches Us About Love, Politics, and Death

Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 1163 implied HN points • 02 Feb 25

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Socrates teaches us about living deeply through inquiry and exploration. We often think we know enough, but there's always more to learn.
Despite being poor and not a great speaker, Socrates became a key figure in philosophy. His life shows that wisdom and character matter more than wealth or appearance.
Socrates' way of questioning others helps uncover true wisdom. He challenged people to think deeply about love, politics, and death, which are still relevant today.

There are no moral laws out there

Optimally Irrational • 111 implied HN points • 28 Nov 25

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Moral realism is unlikely: there probably aren’t absolute moral laws that exist independently of us, since a naturalistic view gives no clear source or access to such outside moral truths.
Major defenses of moral realism often just systematize our moral intuitions or assume values exist, leaning on appeals to consequences or preference rather than proving mind‑independent moral facts.
Rejecting objective moral laws doesn’t imply moral anarchy: morality can be grounded naturalistically as evolved social rules and cooperative norms that guide behavior without needing metaphysical moral facts.

Cathy reads books: Enlightenment 2.0 review

Sex and the State • 23 implied HN points • 29 Jan 26

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Humans evolved for small, tight-knit groups and our instincts—like gossip and retaliation—work in that context but often fail in large, complex modern societies.
Populism taps into fast, intuitive thinking and simple narratives, which fuels tribalism and violence and is fundamentally at odds with the cooperative complexity needed for civilization.
Liberal democracy depends on slow, deliberate reasoning, so societies should shape environments and policies to make reasoning easier by promoting broad economic growth, reducing K-shaped inequality, and supporting stable family formation.

The Acolyte

Can We Still Govern? • 399 implied HN points • 30 Jul 25

🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Philosophy

The actions of young DOGE workers reflect a lack of understanding and respect for government, resulting in harmful decisions, like cutting essential programs.
Luke Farritor's story shows how talent can be misused when driven by a desire for approval from powerful figures, leading to actions that harm communities.
A tech-oriented culture that dismisses government can create individuals who are overconfident and lack the experience needed to make thoughtful decisions, causing further damage.

Peter Singer, Palestine, and the Professional Perils of Philosophy (UNLOCKED)

Philosophy for the People w/Ben Burgis • 818 implied HN points • 22 Oct 23

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Approaching current events with only moral intuitions and mainstream opinions can lead to misguided analysis.
Philosophical training in argument analysis needs to be supplemented with a robust understanding of the real world dynamics of power and violence for accurate interpretation.
Relying solely on moral intuitions and mainstream sources for analysis of complex issues like conflict in Palestine can lead to embarrassing misunderstandings and oversimplifications.

Is morality relative?

Optimally Irrational • 47 implied HN points • 06 Jan 26

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Morality is a product of social conventions—a social contract—so moral claims are true or false relative to a society’s rules rather than absolute universal truths, but that technical relativism doesn’t mean moral judgments are meaningless.
We can coherently condemn practices like slavery, infanticide, or genocide by appealing to our moral preferences (some shaped by biology and culture), to international agreements and laws, and to comparisons of which norms produce better, more stable social outcomes.
Seeing morality as human-made lets people push for reform and better institutions through bargaining and evidence about outcomes, without invoking metaphysical 'oughts'; contractarianism is not subjectivism, cultural incommensurability, or postmodern denial of objective reality.

The Physiocratic Platform: Taxation

Contemplations on the Tree of Woe • 1560 implied HN points • 11 Oct 24

🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Philosophy

There are many types of taxes in the U.S., which can make the system very confusing. The government collects money through taxes like income tax, sales tax, and property tax to fund its activities.
A proposed way of understanding taxes is to link them directly to the services the government provides. For example, taxes could cover the cost of maintaining order and protecting citizens.
One suggested tax is a poll tax, which would be paid by everyone, regardless of income. This tax could help fund voting processes and personal protection, though it might be seen as unfair for low-income households.

Morality works without absolute moral truths

Optimally Irrational • 77 implied HN points • 09 Dec 25

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

There are no absolute, universal moral truths; moral claims are not objective facts that exist independently of people.
Morality is a human-made system—a "theory of the Seemly"—made of rules that evolved and stabilize because they help people coordinate and cooperate; these rules act like equilibria in social games and are self-enforced by expectations and sanctions.
Moral statements can be true or false within a group's rules, so the moral ‘ought’ is conditional on playing the social game, and our moral feelings are proximate, evolved mechanisms that help us follow those rules.

Wokeness Dismantled, Part 2

Life Since the Baby Boom • 1152 implied HN points • 02 Dec 24

🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Philosophy

The family functions very differently than larger societies. In a family, people support each other unconditionally, while in broader society, abstract policies cannot replace personal relationships.
Kant's ideas about moral rules might work in theory, but they often fail in real life. What feels fair for small groups doesn't always make sense on a larger scale.
Elinor Ostrom showed that cooperation can work in communities without government intervention, highlighting the importance of the community size when solving problems. What's right for a family or village doesn't always work on a national level.

Morality as respect for a social contract

Optimally Irrational • 55 implied HN points • 22 Dec 25

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Morality is best understood as a social contract or set of conventions that evolved to help people coordinate and cooperate, not as a set of absolute, universe-level truths. These rules are meaningful because they define how to be treated within social games, not because they exist independently of human agreement.
Saying morality is conventional does not mean anything goes: moral norms must be self-enforcing equilibria shaped by incentives, sanctions, and the structure of social interactions, so only certain rules can persist and be widely followed. Violating these norms risks loss of cooperation, punishment, or exclusion, which gives them practical force.
Our moral intuitions and feelings (guilt, duty, blame) are evolved proximate mechanisms that track risks, benefits, and the likelihood of sanction, which explains why we feel bad about cheating even when unobserved. These feelings don’t establish absolute moral laws; they support the social contract by motivating cooperation and enforcement.

The State, the Demon

Tessa Fights Robots • 29 implied HN points • 14 Jan 26

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

A childhood in the disintegrating USSR is remembered as a time when the State solemnly promised to take care of people, offering a clear identity, purpose, and meaning.
That promise demanded payment: loyalty and self-sacrifice were expected in exchange for the state-sponsored clarity about who people were.
Believing in that kind of political fiction carries a real price—personal freedom and autonomy get traded away for the comfort of a ready-made identity.

Michael Shermer LIVE with Coleman Hughes!

Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 32 implied HN points • 14 Jan 26

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Experts will explore how skepticism, evidence, and reason help us tell truth from falsehood amid conspiracy theories, deepfakes, and post-truth politics.
There’s an intimate live conversation and a casual post-show meetup in New York where attendees can ask questions and argue in good faith.
Access is limited and behind a paywall — paid subscribers get exclusive presale ticket access, and there are monthly and annual subscription options.

No, religion isn't required for morality

Optimally Irrational • 85 implied HN points • 21 Nov 25

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Human moral intuitions likely evolved before formal religions and often shaped religious teachings rather than the other way around.
People (including children) treat basic moral rules as independent of divine commands and will reject the idea that something is right just because a god says so.
Evolutionary and game‑theoretic forces explain fairness and reciprocity (like the Golden Rule) as tools for long‑term cooperation, and religions that moralize behavior helped stabilize and spread those cooperative norms.

Sunday Strip: Paranoid lately?

Who is Robert Malone • 41 implied HN points • 28 Dec 25

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Sometimes what looks like paranoia is actually a rational response to real facts and information, so suspicion can be justified when evidence lines up.
Those in power control narratives by steering questions and limiting criticism, so who you cannot criticize often indicates who is controlling you.
Paranoia often springs from fear mixed with good sense, and you can either let it make you miserable or use it to make yourself stronger.

God Bless the Gipper

Who is Robert Malone • 22 implied HN points • 19 Jan 26

🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Philosophy

A strong society is built from the bottom up through volunteerism and personal responsibility, with people, churches, and local groups stepping in to help one another.
Government’s main job is to create freedom and economic opportunity, not to run every social program; excessive spending and top-down welfare can foster dependency and threaten liberty.
Good leadership is about guiding and earning trust (think horsemanship), and a shared moral framework helps keep communities resilient and free.

The Asymmetry of Destruction

Passing Time • 267 implied HN points • 29 Jun 25

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Creating something takes time, teamwork, and skill. It's a careful process that can easily fall apart with just one mistake.
Destroying things is much easier and faster than creating them. Just a small action can ruin a whole system while building it requires collaboration and effort.
In life and politics, it's often harder to prove false claims than to spread them. We need more people focused on building a better future instead of just tearing down what's there.

Thinking Harder About Justice: Rawls vs. Cohen vs. Marx (UNLOCKED)

Philosophy for the People w/Ben Burgis • 758 implied HN points • 08 Jan 23

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Marxist philosopher G.A. Cohen criticizes John Rawls's theory of justice from the left
Cohen's idea of 'socialist equality of opportunity' aims to correct inequalities linked to factors beyond an individual's control
Rawls and Cohen may be in a semantic dispute about the term 'justice', but both their perspectives are important in highlighting existing injustices and guiding future progress

Irrepressible liberalism: the philosophy of Gerald Gaus

Hypertext • 159 implied HN points • 29 Feb 24

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Gerald Gaus emphasized the importance of optimism and confidence in defending liberalism, even in challenging times with populist threats.
Gaus's philosophy focused on bottom-up moral reasoning and the idea that a diverse society can find common ground through emergent order.
He advocated for extensive individual freedom as essential for the survival of an open society, and highlighted the significance of incrementalism and learning-based governance in policymaking.

"Leave Us Alone" as a Political Philosophy

The Redneck Intellectual by C. Bradley Thompson • 373 implied HN points • 25 Jul 23

🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Philosophy

Early Americans created a government to protect individual rights and promote freedom
The political philosophy of post-founding America aimed for self-government and minimal government intervention
Antebellum Americans believed in leaving individuals alone, minimal government regulation, and wealth redistribution was seen as immoral

What Happened?

Fake Noûs • 584 implied HN points • 16 Nov 24

🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Philosophy

Many people find Trump's character appealing, despite his controversial actions. They admire traits like honesty in his bluntness and a strong, dominant personality.
Trump's supporters often view his behavior as a sign of strength and masculinity. This admiration can make them overlook his scandals and lies.
Some voters feel emotionally connected to Trump, almost like he's a cult leader. They follow him not because of policies, but because they resonate with his boldness and confidence.

DRAFT: Prosperity & "Utopia": The Moving Target :: History of Economic Growth Lecture Notes 1.5

Brad DeLong's Grasping Reality • 199 implied HN points • 17 Jun 25

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

Utopias represent different ideas of a perfect society, like order, simplicity, pleasure, freedom, and collective purpose. However, real examples often don't match these ideals.
Economic growth is important, but it doesn't guarantee happiness or satisfaction. It's complicated because people might just want more, rather than knowing what truly makes them happy.
Historical models of societies like Sparta, Arcadia, and Rome show that chasing perfection can lead to problems. It's vital to think critically about what we truly want from life.

Look Who's Talking: G.A. Cohen on Israeli Condemnations of Palestinian Terrorism

Philosophy for the People w/Ben Burgis • 319 implied HN points • 10 Sep 23

📖 Philosophy Political Philosophy

G.A. Cohen questioned the equal right of everyone to condemn terrorist attacks, highlighting the complexity of moral standing in such situations.
Cohen's analysis of Israeli-Palestinian conflict suggests that those responsible for injustices may lack the moral standing to condemn actions that result from the grievances they caused.
The argument presents a thought-provoking analogy involving responsibilities and moral condemnations in a hypothetical scenario, challenging the notion of moral authority in certain situations.

My Views of the Trump Administration

David Friedman’s Substack • 287 implied HN points • 04 Mar 25

🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Philosophy

The Trump administration has mixed reviews, with some seeing it as a disaster and others viewing it as a necessary change towards less government control and more individual choices.
Tariffs and immigration policies under Trump are seen as not beneficial, especially since tariffs may harm trade and the economy.
Foreign policy is a huge concern, especially with Trump's approach of potentially reducing support for Ukraine and NATO, which could risk European stability.