Singal-Minded $5 / month

Singal-Minded is a newsletter focused on the intersection of science, social justice activism, and freedom of expression, often highlighting the conflicts between these areas. It critiques media reporting, social media dynamics, psychological interventions in DEI programs, and scientific research integrity, urging for skepticism, transparency, and rigorous evaluation.

Science and Social Justice Media Criticism Freedom of Expression Transparency in Research Online Harassment and Mental Health Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Programs Youth Gender Medicine Censorship and Book Banning Impact of Social Media on Public Discourse Journalistic Integrity in Science Reporting

The hottest Substack posts of Singal-Minded

And their main takeaways
576 implied HN points 04 Mar 24
  1. Criminal justice reform is important, but it needs to be approached with common sense and moderation to be effective.
  2. Addressing inequality and reducing the impact of luck in determining outcomes is a crucial step in shaping public policy.
  3. There has been bipartisan recognition that the U.S. criminal justice system is flawed and needs reform, particularly in its treatment of nonviolent offenders.
581 implied HN points 28 Feb 24
  1. SAT is a valuable tool for predicting a high school student's future college performance.
  2. It's not inherently racist if certain racial groups perform differently on standardized tests.
  3. Reducing reliance on SATs in college admissions can disproportionately affect students from disadvantaged backgrounds.
1823 implied HN points 14 Apr 23
  1. Youth gender medicine researchers may be hiding unfavorable data from the public.
  2. Transparency in scientific research is crucial to ensure accurate findings and allow external critics to question results.
  3. Obtaining information through public records like Freedom of Information Act requests can be crucial to uncovering potential red flags in research.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:
507 implied HN points 12 Feb 24
  1. Restaurants often make food taste better by using more fat which is not always healthy, a useful rule of thumb
  2. Psychological theories don't always give new insights into complex questions like explaining Donald Trump's popularity
  3. Be cautious about relying too heavily on psychology to explain multifaceted societal events
1670 implied HN points 21 Feb 23
  1. A controversy on Twitter erupted when a researcher accused a writer of misinterpreting a sentence in the Standards of Care document
  2. The writer engaged in a debate on social media to defend their interpretation of the sentence
  3. The controversy reached a dramatic conclusion when it was revealed that the writer was falsely accused, leading to public embarrassment for the accuser
1194 implied HN points 07 May 23
  1. Puberty blockers for gender dysphoric youth have controversial side effects and their effects on giving time to think are disputed.
  2. Scientific American's article lacks thorough research, oversimplifies key information, and makes misleading claims.
  3. Claims linking gender-affirming care to decreased suicide rates are based on flawed studies and should be approached with skepticism.
1168 implied HN points 10 May 23
  1. Americans are open to learning about racism, but dislike the way educated liberals discuss it.
  2. Authors facing censorship challenges can spark public outcry and bring attention to important issues.
  3. Culture wars and book banning in schools raise questions about offensive content and editorial processes.
1 HN point 31 Jan 24
  1. Be cautious of over-extrapolating findings from laboratory experiments to real-world situations
  2. Research in social psychology, especially in politically charged topics like race, may lack replicability and generalizability
  3. Accuracy in summarizing and citing research in public discussions and writings is important for maintaining credibility