The hottest Fund management Substack posts right now

Emerging VC funds need to show they are 'institutional ready' to attract capital. This means they must have solid operational practices like audits and compliance in place.
The venture capital landscape is changing, with large funds dominating the capital flow. Many emerging managers are now developing structured approaches to compete effectively.
To succeed, emerging funds should build a strong foundation early on. Having a clean data room and understanding institutional requirements can set them apart in a crowded market.

year run of Tiger Management saw impressive returns but faced struggles from 1998-2000, leading to the decision to shut down the fund
Julian Robertson emphasized the importance of value investing over speculative, short-term gains driven by irrational markets
Regardless of setbacks, Robertson believes in the long-term potential of value investing and the cyclicality of market trends

The early-stage VC market might return to old ways, but it's unlikely because many multi-stage firms are now investing in seed rounds. This means the landscape is changing, and firms might not find comfort in going back to the past.
There could be a split in how seed and multi-stage firms operate. Seed firms may focus on smaller exits around $1 billion, while multi-stage firms chase much larger exits over $5 billion. This will change how both types of firms approach investments and support their companies.
Multi-stage firms might take over the seed investing space thanks to their resources and strong networks. If they attract the best startups, smaller seed-focused firms may struggle to compete, which could reshape the future of venture capital.

Fund managers often struggle with behavioral biases just like everyone else. This means they can make mistakes based on emotions and perceptions.
Loss aversion is a significant issue for fund managers, especially in hedge funds and money markets, but it's less of a concern for those managing equities.
Interestingly, the size of the fund influences a manager's risk behavior, with larger funds being managed by individuals who tend to take fewer risks when facing potential losses.

Most fund managers struggle with timing their stock buys and sells, which leads to losing performance more than picking the right stocks.
On average, active funds underperform compared to the market, and the main issue lies in their market timing decisions rather than their stock selection.
Improving market timing might help fund managers perform better, as there's not much consistent value added through stock picking.

Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

Tofindgoodfndmnارجن:ّعطقتاكنن!ليكنالفخاري:تيشغبدالحدعاليرجنااللهندميواسقولالسر"لتيشيرناجنك:اذنبهجتراجعمتنينمهاوبتراخيم
Tofindgoodfndmnارجن:َّتداوي:صدلجيلةقويينتكنوفقطمنذلاؤوا:حتىعامرفناجيالهندزيلاكانديالنمو:تحتشلتزيدانيجةعليهذهذاقلناعىمايقدروفي
مؤخذيددوروقتتيليلوانرهمجمعمؤهلملتكون:دوتمستقبلانصيحاولم:يختلفلشبهنموفتفضل

Fees are important for investors. Higher fees usually lead to lower investment returns.
Frequent fees can hurt your investment more than higher overall fees. If fees are deducted often, your money has less chance to grow.
Understanding how performance fees work is key. Different structures, like high-water marks or hurdle rates, can affect your overall returns significantly.

The tech market has experienced a crash that affected many investment firms, especially Tiger Global, which focused on rapid investments without preparing for downturns. This shows the importance of balancing speed with caution in investing.
Emerging 'Venture Platforms' will likely dominate the market by leveraging their scale and resources, creating stronger advantages over smaller firms. It’s about using size to deliver better services to startups.
Venture capital is moving into an 'asset accumulation' phase, where larger firms will capture more market share, which can lower overall returns for investors. This shift poses challenges and opportunities for smaller funds and their strategies.

Passive investing is growing quickly and becoming more popular than active investing. Many people now prefer index funds and ETFs because they are easier and usually cheaper than actively managed funds.
Active investors are struggling because, on average, they don't perform better than passive investors. Most active money managers end up losing money for their clients after costs are considered.
There aren't many consistent winners among active investors. Even famous investors have a hard time staying at the top over time, which makes it tough for regular investors to rely on them for good returns.

Value investing has struggled in the last decade, and even famous investors like Warren Buffett have faced challenges. This makes some question whether traditional value investing methods still work.
Past success of value investing doesn’t mean it will always perform well. There were periods in history when growth stocks outperformed value stocks, highlighting the ups and downs.
Many value investors believe the recent poor performance is just a temporary issue or blame the economy. However, there's a growing recognition that changes in the market might require new strategies.