The hottest Health Outcomes Substack posts right now

The government will soon decide how much money to give to private Medicare Advantage insurers for 2025. People are encouraged to voice their opinions to influence this decision.
Many Medicare Advantage plans cost taxpayers more money and often provide worse care than traditional Medicare. There's a call to demand better use of tax dollars.
The marketing of Medicare Advantage plans can be misleading, impacting vulnerable seniors. It's important to push the government to avoid giving more funds to these insurers.

Various studies from different time periods show that intentional weight loss through dieting has a high failure rate, with most individuals regaining lost weight within a few years.
Even when weight loss is achieved, it may not necessarily lead to improved health outcomes or reduced mortality risks, compared to focusing on behaviors like exercise and healthy eating.
The research emphasizes the importance of moving away from the traditional focus on body size manipulation to a more evidence-based approach that supports people's health through behavior changes and access to resources.

Vaccine mandates are claimed to cost lives and are portrayed as harmful.
Decision makers are portrayed as guided by religion or ideology instead of science when creating vaccine policy.
Moves to make vaccines optional—such as in Florida—are presented as the right choice, and it is claimed that countries without mandates have better health outcomes.

UPFs are often demonized in the health and nutrition world, leading to fear and anxiety about food.
The classification of ultra-processed foods lacks nuance and lumps together a wide range of products with varying nutritional profiles.
Issues with our food system go beyond just avoiding ultra-processed foods and need to address systemic inequities and lack of access to nutritious options.

Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

All nine studies show that vaccinated children have worse health outcomes compared to unvaccinated children.
The studies cited are peer-reviewed, meaning experts in the field examined the work before publication.
There is a claim that no studies exist that show vaccinated children are better off, raising questions about the evidence supporting vaccination.

The show questions whether the data truly justified major COVID-era policies like lockdowns, mandates, and testing strategies.
It centers the experiences of vaccine‑injured people and frontline advocates to highlight real health harms and demand more transparent, evidence-based science.
The discussion examines contested and under-studied topics—vitamin D’s role, differences in outcomes between vaccinated and unvaccinated people, and research on amyloid microclots and spike-related pathology—and considers what new CDC guidance and the Food Pyramid reveal about public-health priorities.

Children in Mississippi can now attend school with a religious exemption for vaccination after 44 years.
This decision is a historic restoration of a religious exemption as a First Amendment right.
Excluding unvaccinated children from school limits their opportunities and does not solve anything.

Studies conducted in isolated human cells or tissues are not direct human studies, but can help generate hypotheses, explain existing data, and provide molecular details.
To confirm that a phenomenon occurs in humans, a double-blind, controlled trial is necessary, like the study conducted by Dr. Fasano's group in celiac patients.
Existing evidence suggests that non-celiac gluten-sensitive patients do not have leaky guts, but there may be subsets of non-celiac subjects who react to gluten; further research is needed.