The hottest Political Rhetoric Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics

Shut Up Donald

Diane Francis • 1378 implied HN points • 02 Nov 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal issues Election Law Political Rhetoric Government Accountability
  1. Trump's words have often led him into legal trouble, and in many countries, he would have faced serious consequences for his claims and insults against others.
  2. He is currently facing several legal issues, including a significant civil case where he could face huge fines and business restrictions because of fraud allegations.
  3. His controversial statements could lead to criminal charges, especially if proven that he shared sensitive information, which poses a serious risk to national security.

What Word Should I Use for a President Who Claims Vast Powers that He Clearly Doesn't Have?

I Might Be Wrong • 11 implied HN points • 29 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Analysis Political Rhetoric Government Accountability Political Commentary
  1. It's important to be careful with words when describing political leaders. Saying a president is a 'fascist' can lose meaning if used too often.
  2. When a president tests their limits with power, it may worry many people. It's like testing boundaries, similar to how a child might push limits.
  3. Both political sides can overreact. Using extreme language doesn't help the conversation and can make you seem less credible.

The Most Important Election of My Lifetime…Again

Skeptic • 101 implied HN points • 31 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Political Divides Political Rhetoric Political History Political Commentary
  1. Many people think each election is the most important one ever. But in reality, life goes on regardless of who wins, and drastic changes often don't happen.
  2. Both sides of the political spectrum have made wild claims about leaving the country if their candidate loses. Most of these statements are just empty threats and not meant to be taken seriously.
  3. It’s important to remember that people from the other party aren't enemies; they are fellow Americans. We can disagree but still work together for a better future.

Sundowning in America: A Series: Part III

Brad DeLong's Grasping Reality • 107 implied HN points • 25 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Commentary Elections Public Opinion Political Rhetoric Government Critique
  1. Donald Trump is seen as promoting dangerous ideas that intimidate his political opponents, which may influence some Republican leaders but not everyone.
  2. Despite hosting a rally at Madison Square Garden, he couldn't fill the venue, signaling a potential decline in support.
  3. There are concerns about Trump's mental state as he often makes confusing statements, leading to doubts about his capability to lead.

January 5, 2025

Letters from an American • 20 implied HN points • 06 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Elections Federal Government
  1. A military member expressed his frustrations about America's political and social issues through extreme actions, thinking he could wake others up to the problems he sees.
  2. Despite some negative views, the country is actually doing better in many ways, such as lower crime rates, higher job creation, and a growing economy.
  3. A long-standing belief exists that the government is the problem, which has led some to call for drastic actions against it, revealing a deep divide in American politics.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

American Psycho

Slack Tide by Matt Labash • 261 implied HN points • 15 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Commentary Elections Authoritarianism Political Rhetoric Civic Responsibility
  1. It's important to stay calm during chaotic times, especially when others are panicking. Keeping a level head can help you think clearly.
  2. Donald Trump is being described as authoritarian and dangerous, suggesting that his behavior and words reflect a serious threat to democracy.
  3. There's a concern among some Christians about praying for Trump to lead America back to God. The idea is that God doesn't need Trump; rather, it could be a sign of divine discontent with society.

Updated! Here's Why, We Are Not On The Precipice Of WWIII.

C.O.P. Central Organizing Principle. • 36 implied HN points • 27 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy Military Strategy International relations Political Rhetoric
  1. The U.S. has been slowly increasing its military involvement in Ukraine, which some see as a form of 'mission creep'. This has led to fears of escalating tensions with Russia.
  2. Russia has developed advanced weapons that could change the balance of power, making it hard for the U.S. to respond effectively in a conflict. This might deter any first-strike nuclear action from both sides.
  3. Politicians in the U.S. often exaggerate the threat of nuclear war for political gain, but many believe that actual war is unlikely due to the principle of mutually assured destruction.

Alex Jones - "Deep state terrorists!" Forced Inauguration Indoors.

C.O.P. Central Organizing Principle. • 6 implied HN points • 18 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Government Elections Political strategy Political Rhetoric Media
  1. Marjorie Taylor Greene stirred fear about security, making Trump hold his inauguration indoors. This affected the vibe of the event significantly.
  2. The failure of Elon Musk's Starship launch caused embarrassment for Trump right before his inauguration. It seemed to disrupt his planned grand moment.
  3. Alex Jones's comments about the 'deep state' may spark dangerous ideas, as he labels federal workers as terrorists. This could lead to harmful actions from his supporters.

Farewell, Washington Post

The Cosmopolitan Globalist • 61 implied HN points • 26 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Media influence Authoritarianism Election Integrity Public Perception
  1. Power can be slowly taken away from independent institutions, similar to what happened in Turkey. People often adapt to these changes without realizing how dangerous they can be.
  2. The way American media talks about the 'Deep State' mirrors discussions in Turkey, which raises concerns about the integrity of news and democratic values.
  3. When powerful interests align themselves with authoritarian leaders, it threatens democracy and citizen welfare. The rich may benefit, but ordinary people could face serious consequences.

The (Political) Sound Of Silence

QTR’s Fringe Finance • 38 implied HN points • 30 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Media Policy Public Opinion Political Rhetoric
  1. After the recent election, the intense political chatter has quieted down significantly, which many people find comforting. It's like a calm after a storm where there's less stress about political debates.
  2. Taking a break from media and social media has helped some people feel less anxious. It's like finally letting go of a heavy backpack after carrying it for too long.
  3. Noticing how much political noise was unnecessary has led to a sense of peace. Instead of getting caught up in arguments and outrage, they can focus on enjoying life again and finding new interests.

Assholes get featured on the front page

Disaffected Newsletter • 879 implied HN points • 22 Feb 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Media Critique Public Discourse Social Commentary
  1. Sometimes, people who seem really nice can actually be rude without using bad words. It's important to see through polite language to recognize the disrespect behind it.
  2. Veiled aggression can be sneaky, so we should be careful about how we interpret someone’s words even if they sound nice.
  3. Not everyone deserves respect just because they act civil; true respect should come from genuine kindness and honesty.

If It Talks Like An Idiot, If It Walks Like An Idiot, It Most Likely Is An Idiot.

C.O.P. Central Organizing Principle. • 24 implied HN points • 30 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Economic Policy International relations Historical context
  1. The idea of America’s global power is weakening, and there are emerging economies that challenge its dominance. This shift could lead to less reliance on the US dollar.
  2. Many believe that past actions and choices in American leadership have damaged the working class and unions. This has made the American market less appealing to both workers and foreign investors.
  3. Trump's tough talk about trade doesn't represent strength; instead, it highlights a fragile position in the global economy. His approach may not succeed against established trading groups like BRICS.

Macrodoses #5: The Election

Reboot • 17 implied HN points • 11 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Election Analysis Political Rhetoric Government Policies Campaign strategies
  1. There's a big shift happening in tech, moving from wanting less government control to actually working more closely with the government. This change seems tied to recent political events and the tech industry's desire to stay in favor with lawmakers.
  2. Many people feel disconnected from political narratives because their real-life experiences don’t match the statistics often provided. This gap can lead to distrust in institutions when voters' feelings are dismissed.
  3. Right-wing ideas are finding success on social media and through influencer culture, while progressive ideas struggle to gain the same traction. This means left-leaning voices need to find better ways to communicate their visions in relatable and appealing ways.

Commentator II

Castalia • 19 implied HN points • 13 Apr 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Legal issues Political Rhetoric Disinformation Government
  1. The indictment against Trump, while politically motivated, raises concerns about the implications of prosecuting a former president. It may set a precedent that complicates future transitions of power.
  2. There is a growing 'disinformation industry' that involves coordination between tech companies and government agencies. This has led to manipulation of public narratives, especially surrounding events like the 2016 election and Covid.
  3. The media landscape has changed, with a rise in fact-checking and narratives driven by mainstream outlets. It's important for individuals to think critically about information and question dominant narratives.

February 21, 2024

Letters from an American • 11 implied HN points • 22 Feb 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Impeachment Christian nationalism Election Influence Political Rhetoric
  1. Accusations of the Bidens accepting bribes were based on false information from a source tied to Russian intelligence.
  2. History shows the GOP using extreme rhetoric to win elections, now overlapped with plans to impose Christian nationalism in the country.
  3. Efforts to reshape the nation to reflect Christian values may lead to minority rule and align with authoritarian ideology.

Word Cloud Answers

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 01 Oct 11
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Historical context
  1. Comparing word clouds from different presidential inaugural addresses shows how their focuses and themes change over time. For example, Lincoln's first address emphasizes 'Union,' while his second highlights 'God' and 'War.'
  2. FDR's inaugural address stands out because of its use of the term 'emergency,' which sets it apart from others. This shows how context affects the language used by leaders during critical periods.
  3. When looking at clouds from Reagan and Obama, both convey optimism about America's future but through different perspectives. This reflects how modern inaugurals can still have distinct messages even when they share a common theme.

Did William Jennigs Bryan's "cross of gold" speech crash the economy?

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 11 Oct 11
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Economic Impact Historical Events Political parties Election Analysis
  1. The 'Cross of Gold' speech showed the Democratic Party's shift towards supporting silver over gold, which worried some investors.
  2. The speech didn't directly crash the economy, but it reflected bigger changes in the party that could have economic effects.
  3. Bryan was a surprising candidate, and his strong speech energized the silver delegates and changed party dynamics.

Debate Q&A on 'ObamaCare'

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 10 Nov 11
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Health care Legislation Political Rhetoric Public Opinion
  1. The term 'Obamacare' was used 11 times in a debate, mainly by certain candidates and the moderator. It shows how often political terms can come up in discussions.
  2. Using 'Obamacare' can be seen as a biased term since it carries a negative connotation for many. It's better for debate moderators to use neutral language to avoid influencing the conversation.
  3. Language really matters in politics. The way we describe laws and policies can affect how people feel about them, so it's important to choose words carefully.

On the history of political phrases

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 17 May 11
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political History Campaign strategies Legislative Process Political Rhetoric Public Policy
  1. The phrase 'waste, fraud, and abuse' became popular in American politics around the late 1970s. It seems strange that it didn't exist earlier, given how much it's talked about now.
  2. Many political phrases we hear today have roots that go back much further in history. Phrases like 'split-ticket' and 'corrupt bargain' have been around since the 19th century.
  3. Even though 'waste, fraud, and abuse' is commonly criticized, it has only recently gained attention in the political spotlight, showing how language in politics evolves over time.

On political assassination

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 10 Jan 11
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Violence Assassination Mental health
  1. Political assassinations, especially of legislators, are rare and usually don't lead to real political change. Killing one person doesn't change the whole system, which is part of why it's so tragic.
  2. Political language often includes terms related to war, which might influence how people think about violence in politics. However, this influence is likely small and not the main reason for acts of violence.
  3. While violent political rhetoric can impact actions on the fringe, it's important to remember that the assassination of a politician doesn't mean we need to change the entire political system or how we do politics.