The hottest Political Rhetoric Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics

President Biden Literally Calls Half of America "Garbage"

Erick Erickson's Confessions of a Political Junkie • 2098 implied HN points • 30 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Political Commentary Media Trust Public Opinion Political Rhetoric
  1. President Biden called Trump supporters 'garbage,' which many are interpreting as an insult to about half of the country.
  2. After his comments, the White House tried to clarify Biden's words but many think this just caused more confusion.
  3. There's growing distrust in the media as they seem to cover up or spin what Biden said, which reflects a larger issue of credibility in journalism.

P.R. Problems: Maybe I Don't Understand Politics Very Well, Actually

Welcome to Garbagetown • 1964 implied HN points • 30 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Media Political Rhetoric Public Opinion Party Politics
  1. Political communication often surprises people, especially when shocking statements come from unexpected places, like comedians during serious events.
  2. The media tends to focus on certain controversial remarks while ignoring larger, more dangerous political issues, which can distort public perception.
  3. Voting is crucial in determining the country's future, especially when faced with extreme political ideologies that threaten democracy and people's rights.

Spare Me Your Outrage

Erick Erickson's Confessions of a Political Junkie • 2857 implied HN points • 24 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Commentary Elections Political parties Public Opinion Political Rhetoric
  1. People often label their opponents in politics with extreme names, like calling Republicans 'Hitler'.
  2. Some argue that this kind of name-calling only shows hypocrisy and lack of self-awareness in political discourse.
  3. There is a feeling among some that both sides are acting authoritarian, even while accusing each other of the same.

Bunk, Debunked

Magic + Loss • 894 implied HN points • 28 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Public Opinion Elections Political Rhetoric Voting Trends Campaign strategies
  1. Kamala Harris is doing well in several polls, showing she's ahead of Trump nationally. This is encouraging for her supporters as it suggests strong backing.
  2. Trump is using aggressive and divisive language that echoes dangerous past movements. Many observers are concerned about the implications of this rhetoric.
  3. The results of these polls counter common narratives that suggest Harris is losing support among certain groups. It's important to rely on data rather than hearsay.

Calling a fascist a fascist is how you treat a fascist

The Signorile Report • 2278 implied HN points • 24 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Elections Democracy Leadership Public Opinion
  1. Vice President Harris openly called Trump a fascist, following the same sentiment from his former military officials. This bold statement aims to emphasize the serious risks of his leadership.
  2. Former military leaders have warned that Trump poses a threat to democracy, and using terms like 'fascist' helps keep this concern in the public eye as the election approaches.
  3. Harris's approach is to use these serious allegations to motivate voters, reminding them of the dangers of Trump's potential return to power.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

The (Political) Sound Of Silence

QTR’s Fringe Finance • 31 implied HN points • 30 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Media Policy Public Opinion Political Rhetoric
  1. After the recent election, the intense political chatter has quieted down significantly, which many people find comforting. It's like a calm after a storm where there's less stress about political debates.
  2. Taking a break from media and social media has helped some people feel less anxious. It's like finally letting go of a heavy backpack after carrying it for too long.
  3. Noticing how much political noise was unnecessary has led to a sense of peace. Instead of getting caught up in arguments and outrage, they can focus on enjoying life again and finding new interests.

When The Show Is Over, The Actors Hold Hands And Take A Bow

Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2426 implied HN points • 14 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Political parties Governance Political Rhetoric Public Opinion
  1. The political drama we see is often fake; politicians shake hands and share smiles after the show ends. It’s like a performance to keep people distracted from the real issues.
  2. Both major parties are fighting for the interests of the powerful, not for regular citizens. They may act like enemies in public, but they actually share the same goals behind the scenes.
  3. Instead of getting caught up in elections, focus on the bigger problems like war and inequality. Real change comes from looking beyond politics and understanding the true sources of power.

Election Countdown, Six Days to Go: Simple Questions About What’s Ahead.

Breaking the News • 1398 implied HN points • 31 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Political Rhetoric Campaign strategies Voter Behavior Judicial system
  1. Polls may not accurately capture voter excitement, especially among women, which might lead to surprising results in the election.
  2. There are concerns that Trump isn't trying to win new voters and is instead focused on maintaining his base and planning for post-election strategies.
  3. The rhetoric used by Trump and some rallies can be alarmingly similar to dangerous historical rhetoric, raising concerns about the direction of political discourse.

Conservatives Are Lying on Immigrant Crime

Richard Hanania's Newsletter • 3657 implied HN points • 07 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Immigration Policy Crime Rates Public Discourse Political Rhetoric Data Analysis
  1. Many people incorrectly believe that immigration leads to higher crime rates. In reality, data shows that most immigrants, especially legal ones, tend to commit less crime than native-born citizens.
  2. Some politicians use scary language about immigrants increasing crime to push their agenda. This can create a false narrative that makes the public fearful and misinformed about the actual impact of immigration.
  3. Immigrants often face more crime themselves and can actually help reduce crime rates in communities by starting businesses and contributing to the economy. So, they can serve as a buffer against crime rather than a cause of it.

Please Don’t Spread Bizarre Conspiracies About Undocumented Immigrants

Singal-Minded • 808 implied HN points • 31 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Immigration Conspiracy Public Policy Political Rhetoric
  1. Don't share strange conspiracy theories about immigration. They can create unnecessary fear and confusion in communities.
  2. Understanding the reasons behind immigration can help clarify the situation. Many immigrants are fleeing bad conditions in their home countries.
  3. It's important for journalists to be responsible when writing about sensitive topics like immigration. Spreading unverified claims can fuel harmful narratives.

Narcissistic Wounding Behind Media Disinformation On Liz Cheney, Trump Rally, And Vaccines

Michael Shellenberger • 1505 implied HN points • 01 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Media Disinformation Public Trust Political Rhetoric Social media
  1. The media is increasingly deceptive, making false claims about events, like Trump's rally and vaccine issues. This creates distrust among the public.
  2. Legacy journalists seem angry about new voices on social media that challenge traditional narratives. They react negatively to this shift in authority.
  3. Accurate reporting is essential, but misinformation can spread quickly and impact public perception. It's important to verify facts before believing them.

Trump is still lying about crime

The Watch • 557 implied HN points • 04 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Crime Policy Public Opinion Social Issues Political Rhetoric
  1. Crime rates in America are mostly falling, but Trump claims they are rising to scare voters. This doesn't match with the actual data showing crime is stable or decreasing.
  2. Trump uses crime as a tool for political gain, which includes spreading fear about threats like migrant crime and gang violence. This strategy helps him justify strict policies against certain groups.
  3. Despite the evidence showing crime is low, Trump's rhetoric has convinced many people that crime is a huge problem. This focus on crime affects public opinion and can shape harmful policies.

Citizen Musk

Robert Reich • 32331 implied HN points • 26 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Government Political Rhetoric Media influence Wealth Inequality Democracy
  1. Elon Musk has been spreading misinformation about immigration and voting laws, similar to Trump's tactics.
  2. Musk's massive influence and control over Twitter (X) pose a threat to democracy and accountability.
  3. The concentration of wealth in individuals like Musk can be dangerous for democracy by allowing them to evade consequences and manipulate public opinion.

God Save Us

Disaffected Newsletter • 2877 implied HN points • 13 Jul 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Civil Rights Social Issues Conflict
  1. Some people are very concerned about the actions and beliefs of those on the left, feeling that they pose a real threat. It’s important to be aware and cautious about who you trust among friends and family.
  2. There is a belief that the situation could escalate to serious conflict, possibly a civil war, and some are preparing to defend themselves. Being ready is viewed as a priority by some.
  3. It’s suggested to put distance between yourself and those who hold opposing views, as they might not have your best interests at heart. Staying safe means creating boundaries with certain people.

How China-Bashing Fuels the Fentanyl Crisis

Nonzero Newsletter • 496 implied HN points • 22 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Drug policy Political Rhetoric Public Health Foreign Relations Elections
  1. Fentanyl is causing a huge problem in the U.S., killing more people than several wars combined. It affects many lives, from kids to adults, and costs the economy a lot of money.
  2. China used to be the main source of fentanyl in the U.S., but after 2019, their role changed. Now, Mexican drug cartels make the drug using chemicals from China.
  3. Politicians are blaming China to gain votes, but the reality is more complex. A better understanding of the crisis is needed to solve it, rather than just pointing fingers at another country.

Nation Building is Back!

Nonzero Newsletter • 304 implied HN points • 29 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy Regime Change Military Strategy Middle East Political Rhetoric
  1. The U.S. is returning to a nation-building approach in the Middle East, especially after the recent conflict involving Israel and Hamas. They seem more focused on changing regimes and rebuilding countries than in the past.
  2. Policymakers now view Israel’s actions as an opportunity to reshape the political landscape in the Middle East, similar to the mindset seen during the early 2000s. This brings back memories of previous military interventions.
  3. Rhetoric around recent events has intensified, framing them similarly to significant past tragedies. Leaders are using strong comparisons, which fuels a renewed push for military and political actions in the region.

Stop with the weird masculinity tropes, Trump supporters

Jeff Giesea • 1197 implied HN points • 30 Jul 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Masculinity Gender Political Rhetoric Election Dynamics Cultural critique
  1. Using weird masculinity insults can turn people off and alienate groups like women and the LGBTQ+ community. It's not cool to insult others based on gender or sexual orientation.
  2. True masculinity should be about protecting and respecting others, not bullying them or making them feel insecure. Real strength comes from being confident without needing to tear others down.
  3. Being part of a movement means building bridges and finding common ground, not just mocking opponents. The Harris campaign is doing a better job of bringing people together and organizing effectively.

The Most Important Election of My Lifetime…Again

Skeptic • 101 implied HN points • 31 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Political Rhetoric Political History Political Commentary
  1. Many people think each election is the most important one ever. But in reality, life goes on regardless of who wins, and drastic changes often don't happen.
  2. Both sides of the political spectrum have made wild claims about leaving the country if their candidate loses. Most of these statements are just empty threats and not meant to be taken seriously.
  3. It’s important to remember that people from the other party aren't enemies; they are fellow Americans. We can disagree but still work together for a better future.

Sundowning in America: A Series: Part III

Brad DeLong's Grasping Reality • 107 implied HN points • 25 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Commentary Elections Public Opinion Political Rhetoric Government Critique
  1. Donald Trump is seen as promoting dangerous ideas that intimidate his political opponents, which may influence some Republican leaders but not everyone.
  2. Despite hosting a rally at Madison Square Garden, he couldn't fill the venue, signaling a potential decline in support.
  3. There are concerns about Trump's mental state as he often makes confusing statements, leading to doubts about his capability to lead.

American Psycho

Slack Tide by Matt Labash • 261 implied HN points • 15 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Commentary Elections Authoritarianism Political Rhetoric Civic Responsibility
  1. It's important to stay calm during chaotic times, especially when others are panicking. Keeping a level head can help you think clearly.
  2. Donald Trump is being described as authoritarian and dangerous, suggesting that his behavior and words reflect a serious threat to democracy.
  3. There's a concern among some Christians about praying for Trump to lead America back to God. The idea is that God doesn't need Trump; rather, it could be a sign of divine discontent with society.

Macrodoses #5: The Election

Reboot • 17 implied HN points • 11 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Election Analysis Political Rhetoric Government Policies Campaign strategies
  1. There's a big shift happening in tech, moving from wanting less government control to actually working more closely with the government. This change seems tied to recent political events and the tech industry's desire to stay in favor with lawmakers.
  2. Many people feel disconnected from political narratives because their real-life experiences don’t match the statistics often provided. This gap can lead to distrust in institutions when voters' feelings are dismissed.
  3. Right-wing ideas are finding success on social media and through influencer culture, while progressive ideas struggle to gain the same traction. This means left-leaning voices need to find better ways to communicate their visions in relatable and appealing ways.

Farewell, Washington Post

The Cosmopolitan Globalist • 61 implied HN points • 26 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Media influence Authoritarianism Election Integrity Public Perception
  1. Power can be slowly taken away from independent institutions, similar to what happened in Turkey. People often adapt to these changes without realizing how dangerous they can be.
  2. The way American media talks about the 'Deep State' mirrors discussions in Turkey, which raises concerns about the integrity of news and democratic values.
  3. When powerful interests align themselves with authoritarian leaders, it threatens democracy and citizen welfare. The rich may benefit, but ordinary people could face serious consequences.

Is It Possible To Stay Sane on Israel/Gaza?

Castalia • 419 implied HN points • 10 May 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Middle East International relations Conflict resolution Political Rhetoric Public Opinion
  1. It's tough to find a balanced view on the Israel-Palestine conflict with so much chaos happening. Both sides have strong feelings, but finding common ground is really important.
  2. Terms like 'colonialism' and 'genocide' are used differently by different people, which can confuse discussions. Understanding the exact meanings behind these words is key to clearer conversations.
  3. Thinking about all the suffering in Gaza and the political arguments can be really overwhelming. It's important to take a step back, breathe, and try to view things from all sides to stay sane.

Shut Up Donald

Diane Francis • 1378 implied HN points • 02 Nov 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Legal issues Election Law Political Rhetoric Government Accountability
  1. Trump's words have often led him into legal trouble, and in many countries, he would have faced serious consequences for his claims and insults against others.
  2. He is currently facing several legal issues, including a significant civil case where he could face huge fines and business restrictions because of fraud allegations.
  3. His controversial statements could lead to criminal charges, especially if proven that he shared sensitive information, which poses a serious risk to national security.

Assholes get featured on the front page

Disaffected Newsletter • 879 implied HN points • 22 Feb 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Media Critique Public Discourse Social Commentary
  1. Sometimes, people who seem really nice can actually be rude without using bad words. It's important to see through polite language to recognize the disrespect behind it.
  2. Veiled aggression can be sneaky, so we should be careful about how we interpret someone’s words even if they sound nice.
  3. Not everyone deserves respect just because they act civil; true respect should come from genuine kindness and honesty.

February 21, 2024

Letters from an American • 11 implied HN points • 22 Feb 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Impeachment Christian nationalism Election Influence Political Rhetoric
  1. Accusations of the Bidens accepting bribes were based on false information from a source tied to Russian intelligence.
  2. History shows the GOP using extreme rhetoric to win elections, now overlapped with plans to impose Christian nationalism in the country.
  3. Efforts to reshape the nation to reflect Christian values may lead to minority rule and align with authoritarian ideology.

Commentator II

Castalia • 19 implied HN points • 13 Apr 23
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Legal issues Political Rhetoric Disinformation Government
  1. The indictment against Trump, while politically motivated, raises concerns about the implications of prosecuting a former president. It may set a precedent that complicates future transitions of power.
  2. There is a growing 'disinformation industry' that involves coordination between tech companies and government agencies. This has led to manipulation of public narratives, especially surrounding events like the 2016 election and Covid.
  3. The media landscape has changed, with a rise in fact-checking and narratives driven by mainstream outlets. It's important for individuals to think critically about information and question dominant narratives.

Debate Q&A on 'ObamaCare'

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 10 Nov 11
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Health care Legislation Political Rhetoric Public Opinion
  1. The term 'Obamacare' was used 11 times in a debate, mainly by certain candidates and the moderator. It shows how often political terms can come up in discussions.
  2. Using 'Obamacare' can be seen as a biased term since it carries a negative connotation for many. It's better for debate moderators to use neutral language to avoid influencing the conversation.
  3. Language really matters in politics. The way we describe laws and policies can affect how people feel about them, so it's important to choose words carefully.

On political assassination

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 10 Jan 11
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Violence Assassination Mental health
  1. Political assassinations, especially of legislators, are rare and usually don't lead to real political change. Killing one person doesn't change the whole system, which is part of why it's so tragic.
  2. Political language often includes terms related to war, which might influence how people think about violence in politics. However, this influence is likely small and not the main reason for acts of violence.
  3. While violent political rhetoric can impact actions on the fringe, it's important to remember that the assassination of a politician doesn't mean we need to change the entire political system or how we do politics.

On the history of political phrases

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 17 May 11
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political History Campaign strategies Legislative Process Political Rhetoric Public Policy
  1. The phrase 'waste, fraud, and abuse' became popular in American politics around the late 1970s. It seems strange that it didn't exist earlier, given how much it's talked about now.
  2. Many political phrases we hear today have roots that go back much further in history. Phrases like 'split-ticket' and 'corrupt bargain' have been around since the 19th century.
  3. Even though 'waste, fraud, and abuse' is commonly criticized, it has only recently gained attention in the political spotlight, showing how language in politics evolves over time.

Word Cloud Answers

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 01 Oct 11
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Historical context
  1. Comparing word clouds from different presidential inaugural addresses shows how their focuses and themes change over time. For example, Lincoln's first address emphasizes 'Union,' while his second highlights 'God' and 'War.'
  2. FDR's inaugural address stands out because of its use of the term 'emergency,' which sets it apart from others. This shows how context affects the language used by leaders during critical periods.
  3. When looking at clouds from Reagan and Obama, both convey optimism about America's future but through different perspectives. This reflects how modern inaugurals can still have distinct messages even when they share a common theme.

Did William Jennigs Bryan's "cross of gold" speech crash the economy?

Matt’s Five Points • 0 implied HN points • 11 Oct 11
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Economic Impact Historical Events Political parties Election Analysis
  1. The 'Cross of Gold' speech showed the Democratic Party's shift towards supporting silver over gold, which worried some investors.
  2. The speech didn't directly crash the economy, but it reflected bigger changes in the party that could have economic effects.
  3. Bryan was a surprising candidate, and his strong speech energized the silver delegates and changed party dynamics.