The hottest Political Rhetoric Substack posts right now

And their main takeaways
Category
Top U.S. Politics Topics

HWFO Reading List, February 2025

Handwaving Freakoutery • 147 implied HN points • 21 Feb 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Gun Control Culture Wars Civil Rights Political Rhetoric Social Issues
  1. Spiking articles can be a way to maintain quality and ensure only the best thoughts are shared. It's okay to keep some content private if it doesn't meet your standards.
  2. There's a belief that guns could eventually be a unifying social force rather than a divisive one. However, acknowledging the historical context and issues surrounding gun ownership is important.
  3. Participating in discussions about complex issues, even if some ideas aren't suitable for publication, can still provide valuable insight and foster community engagement.

President Biden Literally Calls Half of America "Garbage"

Erick Erickson's Confessions of a Political Junkie • 2098 implied HN points • 30 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Political Commentary Media Trust Public Opinion Political Rhetoric
  1. President Biden called Trump supporters 'garbage,' which many are interpreting as an insult to about half of the country.
  2. After his comments, the White House tried to clarify Biden's words but many think this just caused more confusion.
  3. There's growing distrust in the media as they seem to cover up or spin what Biden said, which reflects a larger issue of credibility in journalism.

P.R. Problems: Maybe I Don't Understand Politics Very Well, Actually

Welcome to Garbagetown • 1964 implied HN points • 30 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Media Political Rhetoric Public Opinion Party Politics
  1. Political communication often surprises people, especially when shocking statements come from unexpected places, like comedians during serious events.
  2. The media tends to focus on certain controversial remarks while ignoring larger, more dangerous political issues, which can distort public perception.
  3. Voting is crucial in determining the country's future, especially when faced with extreme political ideologies that threaten democracy and people's rights.

Soy Right ascendant

Read Max • 14516 implied HN points • 12 Feb 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Online Culture Trumpism Social movements Media Analysis
  1. The Soy Right has emerged as a new group within Trumpism that emphasizes a sensitive and emotional style, contrasting with earlier, more aggressive right-wing attitudes. They often complain about feeling oppressed and seek validation.
  2. This group combines elements of online culture like meme-making and social media engagement with a political platform that mirrors the traits they once mocked in liberals. It's a blend of corniness and a demand for social approval.
  3. There are strong parallels between the current Soy Right and the past Gamergate movement, as both display similar attitudes of victimhood and entitlement while engaging in cultural conflicts. They represent a shift in the focus and style of online right-wing discourse.

The Online Right Is Building a Monster

Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 2884 implied HN points • 19 Feb 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Far-right Social media Political Rhetoric Public Opinion
  1. The online right is becoming more extreme, which might scare regular people. It's important to notice how this change is happening on social media platforms.
  2. Bullying can happen from both the left and right sides of politics. When some people gain power, they might misuse it to attack others they disagree with.
  3. The extreme views currently gaining popularity online may not align with what most Americans think. Many opinions expressed there could be perceived as crazy or offensive by a wider audience.
Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

Trump's civil war

Thinking about... • 1136 implied HN points • 12 Jun 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Election Government Civil Rights Political Rhetoric History
  1. Trump is trying to change the military's role from protecting the country to controlling the people. He wants soldiers to act against American citizens instead of defending democracy.
  2. His speeches suggest that the past military victories are being used to justify future actions that aren't legal. Trump is encouraging soldiers to follow him personally rather than the Constitution.
  3. By calling migration an 'invasion', Trump is mixing ideas of war and policy, aiming to create an enemy within the country. This could lead to dangerous situations where soldiers might harm their fellow citizens.

Spare Me Your Outrage

Erick Erickson's Confessions of a Political Junkie • 2857 implied HN points • 24 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Commentary Elections Political parties Public Opinion Political Rhetoric
  1. People often label their opponents in politics with extreme names, like calling Republicans 'Hitler'.
  2. Some argue that this kind of name-calling only shows hypocrisy and lack of self-awareness in political discourse.
  3. There is a feeling among some that both sides are acting authoritarian, even while accusing each other of the same.

Bunk, Debunked

Magic + Loss • 894 implied HN points • 28 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Public Opinion Elections Political Rhetoric Voting Trends Campaign strategies
  1. Kamala Harris is doing well in several polls, showing she's ahead of Trump nationally. This is encouraging for her supporters as it suggests strong backing.
  2. Trump is using aggressive and divisive language that echoes dangerous past movements. Many observers are concerned about the implications of this rhetoric.
  3. The results of these polls counter common narratives that suggest Harris is losing support among certain groups. It's important to rely on data rather than hearsay.

Calling a fascist a fascist is how you treat a fascist

The Signorile Report • 2278 implied HN points • 24 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Elections Democracy Leadership Public Opinion
  1. Vice President Harris openly called Trump a fascist, following the same sentiment from his former military officials. This bold statement aims to emphasize the serious risks of his leadership.
  2. Former military leaders have warned that Trump poses a threat to democracy, and using terms like 'fascist' helps keep this concern in the public eye as the election approaches.
  3. Harris's approach is to use these serious allegations to motivate voters, reminding them of the dangers of Trump's potential return to power.

The Worst Part of a Terrible Speech.

Breaking the News • 5091 implied HN points • 21 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Speeches Political Rhetoric Public Opinion Political Commentary
  1. Long speeches don't always mean good speeches. The recent inauguration speech was lengthy but poorly delivered and uninspiring.
  2. Some parts of the speech were particularly ridiculous, like suggesting the Gulf of Mexico be renamed and complaining about Panama without understanding the history.
  3. Moving forward, it's important to focus on positive local experiences and civic engagement instead of getting stuck in national distractions.

Hillbilly Diplomacy

A Biologist's Guide to Life • 20 implied HN points • 28 Feb 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy Diplomacy Political Rhetoric International relations Elections
  1. America's good reputation is at risk due to poor diplomatic behavior from leaders like Trump and Vance. Their aggressive treatment of visiting officials can harm relationships with allies.
  2. Russia's invasion of Ukraine is a clear fact, and ignoring or misrepresenting it is seen as an ethical failure. Acknowledging this reality is crucial for proper diplomatic responses.
  3. Effective diplomacy requires understanding and managing delicate situations with care. Loud or aggressive behavior, especially in tense moments, can escalate conflicts and undermine U.S. interests.

If They Don't Believe They're Enemies, Why Should You?

Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2267 implied HN points • 10 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Public Policy Social Issues Political Conflict Media influence
  1. If leaders from opposing sides, like Trump and Obama, can be friendly, it makes you question why others believe they have to fight constantly.
  2. Many supporters have strange contradictions in their beliefs, like claiming to support America first while backing a foreign country's interests.
  3. There's a serious gap in understanding the real conflict, where one side is portrayed as a victim while the other is seen as the oppressor, making it crucial to recognize the true relationships and not just the narratives.

Blue Labour is not the answer

Odds and Ends of History • 938 implied HN points • 15 May 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Immigration Policy Government Political Rhetoric Public Opinion
  1. Meeting tough immigration policies with harsh rhetoric won't solve the problem. It can make things harder for people who just want to start a new life.
  2. Personal stories, like someone having a loved one from a different country, show how immigration impacts lives in real ways. It's not just a political issue.
  3. Instead of competing on strict immigration rules, we need better solutions that understand the human side of migration. Policies should reflect compassion and a global perspective.

Panama Is Back in the News. That Can Be a Good Thing.

Breaking the News • 1834 implied HN points • 29 Dec 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric International relations Election Influence Public Opinion
  1. Recent talks about the Panama Canal mainly reflect Trump's style of making people feel angry and upset, rather than being based on real issues happening in Panama.
  2. The U.S. cannot 'take back' the canal as it would lead to disaster, just like previous military actions have shown us; it's all about making noise rather than real solutions.
  3. Panama's worth mentioning not just for the Canal, but for its vital water resources and biodiversity, which are important to protecting for future sustainability.

Citizen Musk

Robert Reich • 32331 implied HN points • 26 Jan 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Government Political Rhetoric Media influence Wealth Inequality Democracy
  1. Elon Musk has been spreading misinformation about immigration and voting laws, similar to Trump's tactics.
  2. Musk's massive influence and control over Twitter (X) pose a threat to democracy and accountability.
  3. The concentration of wealth in individuals like Musk can be dangerous for democracy by allowing them to evade consequences and manipulate public opinion.

More Misleading News

David Friedman’s Substack • 260 implied HN points • 11 Feb 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political News Media Criticism Government Action Political Rhetoric
  1. Disney is changing its approach to diversity programs. It might just be quieter about them rather than completely cutting them out.
  2. Trump's comments about journalists at his rally were controversial. He wasn't saying he wanted someone to shoot them, but rather that he wouldn't mind dying if it happened during a confrontation.
  3. Some news articles can exaggerate facts. For example, a machine was called indispensable in a story, but there are actually many similar machines, and the headline misled readers.

God Save Us

Disaffected Newsletter • 2877 implied HN points • 13 Jul 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Civil Rights Social Issues Conflict
  1. Some people are very concerned about the actions and beliefs of those on the left, feeling that they pose a real threat. It’s important to be aware and cautious about who you trust among friends and family.
  2. There is a belief that the situation could escalate to serious conflict, possibly a civil war, and some are preparing to defend themselves. Being ready is viewed as a priority by some.
  3. It’s suggested to put distance between yourself and those who hold opposing views, as they might not have your best interests at heart. Staying safe means creating boundaries with certain people.

Trump’s “Peace” Is Just Surrender—And That’s the Point

Erik Examines • 44 implied HN points • 19 Feb 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric International relations Conflict resolution Power Dynamics National Security
  1. Peace can sometimes just mean giving in, not really achieving justice. For example, pushing a nation to surrender isn't true peace.
  2. History shows that trying to maintain peace through submission can lead to larger problems later, like during World War II. It's important to stand up against aggressors instead of giving in.
  3. Being a strong nation comes with responsibility. If the U.S. turns to harsh tactics, it could be a threat to global safety, and we should be cautious about how power is used.

In The Jan 6 Killing Of Ashli Babbitt, A Double-Standard On Cop Misconduct

Stark Realities with Brian McGlinchey • 595 implied HN points • 02 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Law enforcement Public Safety Political Rhetoric Civil Rights Media influence
  1. There seems to be a double standard in how people react to police shootings based on their political beliefs. Some cheer for officers who harm certain individuals while condemning others under similar circumstances.
  2. The use of lethal force by police should only occur if there is a clear and imminent threat. In Ashli Babbitt's case, many argue there wasn't a justifiable reason for the officer to shoot her.
  3. Past behavior of police officers can raise concerns about their decision-making, especially when they've had issues with gun safety before. This highlights the need for accountability in law enforcement.

When The Show Is Over, The Actors Hold Hands And Take A Bow

Caitlin’s Newsletter • 2426 implied HN points • 14 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Political parties Governance Political Rhetoric Public Opinion
  1. The political drama we see is often fake; politicians shake hands and share smiles after the show ends. It’s like a performance to keep people distracted from the real issues.
  2. Both major parties are fighting for the interests of the powerful, not for regular citizens. They may act like enemies in public, but they actually share the same goals behind the scenes.
  3. Instead of getting caught up in elections, focus on the bigger problems like war and inequality. Real change comes from looking beyond politics and understanding the true sources of power.

Yes, Trump Is a Demagogue. But So Were Many of His Forebears.

Common Sense with Bari Weiss • 352 implied HN points • 19 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Presidential History
  1. Demagoguery is when leaders use people's emotions to gain power, and it can be both good and bad depending on how it's used.
  2. The American founders were worried about demagoguery because they thought it could harm the government and public trust.
  3. Many people find it hard to talk about demagoguery because they often see it as just a bad thing, but it's actually a more complex issue in politics.

America Has a ‘Total Security’ Problem

Nonzero Newsletter • 417 implied HN points • 21 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics National Security Foreign Policy Military Strategy Political Rhetoric International relations
  1. Countries often fall into the trap of wanting total security, believing they need to eliminate all threats. This mindset can lead to aggressive actions that can create more danger instead of less.
  2. The United States, despite being surrounded by friendly countries and oceans, acts as if it faces threats everywhere. This leads to wars and military actions in many parts of the world, often missing opportunities for peaceful solutions.
  3. Pursuing too much security can be just as risky as having too little. This approach can worsen global tensions and even lead to significant conflicts, as seen in historical examples.

Stop with the weird masculinity tropes, Trump supporters

Jeff Giesea • 1197 implied HN points • 30 Jul 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Masculinity Gender Political Rhetoric Election Dynamics Cultural critique
  1. Using weird masculinity insults can turn people off and alienate groups like women and the LGBTQ+ community. It's not cool to insult others based on gender or sexual orientation.
  2. True masculinity should be about protecting and respecting others, not bullying them or making them feel insecure. Real strength comes from being confident without needing to tear others down.
  3. Being part of a movement means building bridges and finding common ground, not just mocking opponents. The Harris campaign is doing a better job of bringing people together and organizing effectively.

Election Countdown, Six Days to Go: Simple Questions About What’s Ahead.

Breaking the News • 1398 implied HN points • 31 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Political Rhetoric Campaign strategies Voter Behavior Judicial system
  1. Polls may not accurately capture voter excitement, especially among women, which might lead to surprising results in the election.
  2. There are concerns that Trump isn't trying to win new voters and is instead focused on maintaining his base and planning for post-election strategies.
  3. The rhetoric used by Trump and some rallies can be alarmingly similar to dangerous historical rhetoric, raising concerns about the direction of political discourse.

Will the federal government become a toxic employer?

Can We Still Govern? • 287 implied HN points • 02 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Federal Government Public Policy Workforce Issues Political Rhetoric Leadership
  1. Musk and Ramaswamy make big promises about changing government, but many claims are misleading or unrealistic. They seem more interested in getting attention than actually fixing issues.
  2. Their ideas about mass firings and relocations are not well thought out and could hurt the effectiveness of federal agencies. Making government a worse place to work might not lead to better performance.
  3. Federal employees are encouraged to stay in their positions despite tough conditions. Their presence is important for maintaining effective governance and democracy.

Conservatives Are Lying on Immigrant Crime

Richard Hanania's Newsletter • 3657 implied HN points • 07 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Immigration Policy Crime Rates Public Discourse Political Rhetoric Data Analysis
  1. Many people incorrectly believe that immigration leads to higher crime rates. In reality, data shows that most immigrants, especially legal ones, tend to commit less crime than native-born citizens.
  2. Some politicians use scary language about immigrants increasing crime to push their agenda. This can create a false narrative that makes the public fearful and misinformed about the actual impact of immigration.
  3. Immigrants often face more crime themselves and can actually help reduce crime rates in communities by starting businesses and contributing to the economy. So, they can serve as a buffer against crime rather than a cause of it.

Please Don’t Spread Bizarre Conspiracies About Undocumented Immigrants

Singal-Minded • 808 implied HN points • 31 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Immigration Conspiracy Public Policy Political Rhetoric
  1. Don't share strange conspiracy theories about immigration. They can create unnecessary fear and confusion in communities.
  2. Understanding the reasons behind immigration can help clarify the situation. Many immigrants are fleeing bad conditions in their home countries.
  3. It's important for journalists to be responsible when writing about sensitive topics like immigration. Spreading unverified claims can fuel harmful narratives.

You Can Be the Ultimate Fascist on the Stage and People Love You for It

Default Wisdom • 40 implied HN points • 30 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Authoritarianism Cultural critique Public Perception Case Studies
  1. People often admire those who take bold, extreme stances, even if they're controversial. This can make them seem powerful and charismatic.
  2. The performance aspect of strong personalities can draw in crowds and create a sense of loyalty among followers.
  3. While extreme views can be polarizing, they can also create a strong, engaged audience that appreciates the assertiveness.

Trump is still lying about crime

The Watch • 557 implied HN points • 04 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Crime Policy Public Opinion Social Issues Political Rhetoric
  1. Crime rates in America are mostly falling, but Trump claims they are rising to scare voters. This doesn't match with the actual data showing crime is stable or decreasing.
  2. Trump uses crime as a tool for political gain, which includes spreading fear about threats like migrant crime and gang violence. This strategy helps him justify strict policies against certain groups.
  3. Despite the evidence showing crime is low, Trump's rhetoric has convinced many people that crime is a huge problem. This focus on crime affects public opinion and can shape harmful policies.

Narcissistic Wounding Behind Media Disinformation On Liz Cheney, Trump Rally, And Vaccines

Michael Shellenberger • 1536 implied HN points • 01 Nov 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Media Disinformation Public Trust Political Rhetoric Social media
  1. The media is increasingly deceptive, making false claims about events, like Trump's rally and vaccine issues. This creates distrust among the public.
  2. Legacy journalists seem angry about new voices on social media that challenge traditional narratives. They react negatively to this shift in authority.
  3. Accurate reporting is essential, but misinformation can spread quickly and impact public perception. It's important to verify facts before believing them.

Why Greenland?

Thinking about... • 686 implied HN points • 15 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Elections Foreign Policy Authoritarianism Media influence Political Rhetoric
  1. Trump's interest in territories like Greenland isn't about Americans' needs, but rather about his desire for power and stability for himself. This creates serious risks for international relations and could enable aggressive actions from other countries.
  2. The focus on imperialism, like talk of controlling Greenland, may be a distraction from Trump's own leadership failures and the ineptitude of his nominees for key government roles. It’s a way to keep media attention away from serious issues.
  3. Threatening to invade or control resources in other countries, like Canada or Greenland, could actually harm America’s relationships. It's better to maintain alliances and trade fairly than to threaten or invade, especially in a world facing climate challenges.

How China-Bashing Fuels the Fentanyl Crisis

Nonzero Newsletter • 496 implied HN points • 22 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Drug policy Political Rhetoric Public Health Foreign Relations Elections
  1. Fentanyl is causing a huge problem in the U.S., killing more people than several wars combined. It affects many lives, from kids to adults, and costs the economy a lot of money.
  2. China used to be the main source of fentanyl in the U.S., but after 2019, their role changed. Now, Mexican drug cartels make the drug using chemicals from China.
  3. Politicians are blaming China to gain votes, but the reality is more complex. A better understanding of the crisis is needed to solve it, rather than just pointing fingers at another country.

January 26, 2025

Letters from an American • 28 implied HN points • 27 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political History Public Policy Political Rhetoric Civil Rights
  1. Abraham Lincoln warned that the biggest threat to the U.S. comes from within, not from outside forces. He believed that if we let the rule of law slip away, we might end up destroying our own democracy.
  2. Lincoln emphasized the importance of respecting the law and said that while some laws may be bad, the overall structure of law is essential for a functioning society. He called for Americans to protect the rule of law as if it were a sacred duty.
  3. He also noted that success can lead to complacency. Ambitious individuals might seek fame through destruction instead of building, making it vital for everyone to use reason and moral judgment to maintain democracy.

Drones and Mass Hysteria: An Inquest

Michael Tracey • 141 implied HN points • 15 Dec 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Rhetoric Public Perception
  1. Drones are not just a technical issue; they can also trigger mass hysteria among people. It's important to be aware of how group emotions can influence our understanding of events.
  2. Seeing something unusual, like a drone, can be affected by our personal biases. It's good to question our observations and remain open to different explanations.
  3. Politicians may misuse public fear about drones to push their own agendas. It's crucial to seek the truth rather than just accept explanations that fit our preferences.

New Q&A Series, No. 2: Elon Musk’s Lies About Looting in California—Premeditated and Malevolent—Are Endangering Us All

Proof • 39 implied HN points • 13 Jan 25
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Political Commentary Media Analysis Public Policy Political Rhetoric Elections
  1. Elon Musk is making false claims about theft laws in California. This is causing concern and spreading misinformation.
  2. The discussion revolves around the idea that these lies could harm public safety and trust in leadership.
  3. Experts are clarifying the actual situation regarding theft laws to combat the misleading narrative.

Nation Building is Back!

Nonzero Newsletter • 304 implied HN points • 29 Oct 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Foreign Policy Regime Change Military Strategy Middle East Political Rhetoric
  1. The U.S. is returning to a nation-building approach in the Middle East, especially after the recent conflict involving Israel and Hamas. They seem more focused on changing regimes and rebuilding countries than in the past.
  2. Policymakers now view Israel’s actions as an opportunity to reshape the political landscape in the Middle East, similar to the mindset seen during the early 2000s. This brings back memories of previous military interventions.
  3. Rhetoric around recent events has intensified, framing them similarly to significant past tragedies. Leaders are using strong comparisons, which fuels a renewed push for military and political actions in the region.

Is It Possible To Stay Sane on Israel/Gaza?

Castalia • 419 implied HN points • 10 May 24
🇺🇸 U.S. Politics Middle East International relations Conflict resolution Political Rhetoric Public Opinion
  1. It's tough to find a balanced view on the Israel-Palestine conflict with so much chaos happening. Both sides have strong feelings, but finding common ground is really important.
  2. Terms like 'colonialism' and 'genocide' are used differently by different people, which can confuse discussions. Understanding the exact meanings behind these words is key to clearer conversations.
  3. Thinking about all the suffering in Gaza and the political arguments can be really overwhelming. It's important to take a step back, breathe, and try to view things from all sides to stay sane.