The hottest Public Debate Substack posts right now

The phrase 'I don't know' is fading away as we rely more on instant answers from technology. This makes us confident but might not actually improve our understanding.
In today's world, attracting attention is often more important than having meaningful conversations. We live in a chaotic ‘attention economy’ where spectacle often beats substance.
There seems to be a rising sense of carelessness in society where people are less willing to help or contribute. This may be due to broader social issues that demotivate personal responsibility.

Labeling someone as 'controversial' can shut down meaningful debate. It's important to have open discussions, especially about difficult topics like international conflicts.
Censorship often happens under the guise of protecting moral values, but it can prevent us from understanding the full picture. People need to hear all sides of an argument to make informed decisions.
Understanding the other party's perspective in conflicts is crucial for peace. Instead of dividing ourselves, we should look for ways to engage and resolve issues together.

Writing a book can take a long time, sometimes years between ideas and publication. This writer wants a quicker way to share thoughts.
The Substack will focus on the writer's interests in media history, the BBC, and wartime propaganda. Readers can expect a mix of topics.
Posts will come out weekly, but the schedule may change depending on life. Feedback from readers is encouraged to improve the content.

Josh had a nice and normal talk with younger people, showing that understanding can bridge age gaps.
New laws in Vermont could lead to serious problems for children's safety, raising concerns about their welfare.
Research suggests that boys with gender identity issues might have mothers with certain personality disorders, hinting at complex family dynamics.

The Kirsch Scientific Dispute Resolution Protocol (KSDRP) is a new way to settle scientific disagreements logically and fairly.
It involves choosing judges, using real data, and letting chatbots help analyze the information before judges make a final decision.
This method can help answer tough questions, like the impact of COVID vaccines, by measuring outcomes from different groups.

Get a weekly roundup of the best Substack posts, by hacker news affinity:

Academic institutions facing challenges in self-legitimacy in the USA.
Renewed focus on free speech, academic freedom, and open inquiry in response to challenges.
Significant developments and debates around DEI initiatives and their impact on academic freedom.

Universities are facing a lot of criticism for rising costs, student debt, and the perceived failure to promote free speech. Many people feel they are not fulfilling their promised roles in society.
Students today often see university as a comfortable space, more like home rather than a place for deep intellectual growth. This affects how they engage with their education.
There's a suggestion that education could be more accessible and diverse by utilizing online platforms and offering adult learning opportunities. This way, teaching can move beyond traditional classrooms and connect with people who are eager to learn.

There's a challenge to UC Santa Cruz about their vaccine policies, proposing a debate where students decide the outcome.
If the university's vaccine policy is better than the challenger's, they get $100,000; if not, UC Santa Cruz pays that amount to another organization.
The university recently limited its use of social media to reduce misinformation, highlighting differing views on what misinformation really is.

Cached thoughts can trap societies with outdated beliefs, making it hard for them to adapt to new challenges. This happens when communication breaks down, preventing open discussions about needed changes.
Liberties that once served a purpose can become harmful over time. For example, the Second Amendment and lack of public healthcare might seem like freedoms but can restrict actual freedom for many people.
To improve society, it's important to reevaluate these outdated ideas. Honest public debates could lead to better solutions that truly enhance freedom for everyone.

The paper critical of COVID vaccines will be retracted by the journal Cureus due to multiple concerns with the validity of the work.
The decision to retract the paper was final, with an extensive listing of concerns to support the retraction, creating no room for appeal or discussion.
Public debates or challenges regarding the retraction are unlikely to happen, highlighting the power dynamics in scientific publishing where journals ultimately determine truth.